> There is a deep difference between the word “real” and “true”. The first
> refers to the world of the appearance, which appears like the contrary
> and equal action to the true action. In this way, since is the action to
> be true one, the reaction – or the equal and contrary action - is equal,
> but contrary to the truth.

> On Sat, 16 Aug 2008 01:30:48 -0700, amoram wrote:

>> There is a deep difference between the word “real” and “true”. The first
>> refers to the world of the appearance, which appears like the contrary
>> and equal action to the true action. In this way, since is the action to
>> be true one, the reaction – or the equal and contrary action - is equal,
>> but contrary to the truth.

>
> You might have added as the first two words to this: "I believe", or "I
> think".
>
> Can you be a little clearer here? May some concrete example?

> There is a deep difference between the word “real” and “true”. The
> first refers to the world of the appearance, which appears like the
> contrary and equal action to the true action. In this way, since is
> the action to be true one, the reaction – or the equal and contrary
> action - is equal, but contrary to the truth.
> While our spirit is seeing a world in regression in the time (and this
> is his true action) we are seeing the equal and contrary action of the
> matter (contrary to the spirit) returning towards that death from
> which the Soul is already returning.
> It is like what regards every day: we cannot se a new one if before
> the sun hasn’t returned to the point in which is its birth, returned
> from the point of the end of the day.
> Since, to allow a new day, the true action is the return to the
> beginning, we, returning to the beginning of our life act in a
> destructive way. In fact all the life lived is brought again to its
> principle, through the destruction of all the actions of the life.
>
> Therefore the TRUTH is that all the good and the evil that exists in
> our life are in destruction and not in action. ...