| <We have a world without evil; it isn’t "real" one, in the appearance, but it is "true" one>, by Romano Amodeo . |
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
Group: alt.philosophy · Group Profile
Author: amoramamoram Date: Aug 16, 2008 01:30
There is a deep difference between the word “real” and “true”. The
first refers to the world of the appearance, which appears like the
contrary and equal action to the true action. In this way, since is
the action to be true one, the reaction – or the equal and contrary
action - is equal, but contrary to the truth.
While our spirit is seeing a world in regression in the time (and this
is his true action) we are seeing the equal and contrary action of the
matter (contrary to the spirit) returning towards that death from
which the Soul is already returning.
It is like what regards every day: we cannot se a new one if before
the sun hasn’t returned to the point in which is its birth, returned
from the point of the end of the day.
Since, to allow a new day, the true action is the return to the
beginning, we, returning to the beginning of our life act in a
destructive way. In fact all the life lived is brought again to its
principle, through the destruction of all the actions of the life.
Therefore the TRUTH is that all the good and the evil that exists in
our life are in destruction and not in action.
The General Force, like the Universal Gravitation that is amassing
everything in one point, is reducing everything to ONE… but - like in
the universe – we, not seeing the TRUE ACTION, but the REAL AN
CONTRARY REACTION, perceive the expansion, as of the life, as of the
Universe.
This real expansion is really perceived and understood as REAL ONE,
but isn’t TRUE ONE.
So we have to understand that the world is without evil and without
lack of congruency, but that – since we perceive the opposite to the
truth – we see the evil in action and the absurd expansion of the
Universe and we need in the Spiritual contest a true conversion, and
in the Universe the BIG-BANG.
But this BIG-BANG that we really see… isn’t the true action, but the
contrary and equal action forced by the Universal Gravitation, and so
it isn’t a lack of congruency to the action of the Universal
Gravitation.
Romano Amodeo
|