| Re: <We have a world without evil; it isn’t "real" one, in the appearance, but it is "true" one>, by Romano Am odeo. |
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
Group: alt.philosophy · Group Profile
Author: marcolimarcoli Date: Aug 17, 2008 02:37
On 16 Ago, 10:30, amoram wrote:
> There is a deep difference between the word “real” and “true”. The
> first refers to the world of the appearance, which appears like the
> contrary and equal action to the true action. In this way, since is
> the action to be true one, the reaction – or the equal and contrary
> action - is equal, but contrary to the truth.
> While our spirit is seeing a world in regression in the time (and this
> is his true action) we are seeing the equal and contrary action of the
> matter (contrary to the spirit) returning towards that death from
> which the Soul is already returning.
> It is like what regards every day: we cannot se a new one if before
> the sun hasn’t returned to the point in which is its birth, returned
> from the point of the end of the day.
> Since, to allow a new day, the true action is the return to the
> beginning, we, returning to the beginning of our life act in a
> destructive way. In fact all the life lived is brought again to its
> principle, through the destruction of all the actions of the life.
>
> Therefore the TRUTH is that all the good and the evil that exists in
> our life are in destruction and not in action.
> The General Force, like the Universal Gravitation that is amassing
> everything in one point, is reducing everything to ONE… but - like in
> the universe – we, not seeing the TRUE ACTION, but the REAL AN
> CONTRARY REACTION, perceive the expansion, as of the life, as of the
> Universe.
> This real expansion is really perceived and understood as REAL ONE,
> but isn’t TRUE ONE.
> So we have to understand that the world is without evil and without
> lack of congruency, but that – since we perceive the opposite to the
> truth – we see the evil in action and the absurd expansion of the
> Universe and we need in the Spiritual contest a true conversion, and
> in the Universe the BIG-BANG.
> But this BIG-BANG that we really see… isn’t the true action, but the
> contrary and equal action forced by the Universal Gravitation, and so
> it isn’t a lack of congruency to the action of the Universal
> Gravitation.
>
> Romano Amodeo
Really this way to realize the existence is so innovative one that it
ought have a better chance. But there's a time and place for
everything, Mr. Romano Amodeo!
|