According to Kantian chazzzzz.

"And what we see, is not the same as the thing we are looking at."

But HOW would chazzzzz know that what he's looking at is not the same
thing that he's seeing, if what he's seeing is not the same thing that
he's looking at?

What else could it be if what he's seeeeing is not what he's looking
at?

Does this utter diatribe of the Kantians mean, that, when chazzzz'z
wife says: "Look there's the cunt who raped me" chazzz would have to
reply, "No dear, ewe're mistaken, what ewe are seeeeing now is not the
same cunt that ewe were looking at on the night he raped ewe"?

How does seeeing and loooking change the entity that is being seen or
loooked at?

Michael Gordge

On Apr 5, 5:42 pm, Michael Gordge xtra.co.nz> wrote:

This sounds like the persuasive argument that what we form concepts
about are digitized "coded representations" of possible activities in
the proposed world.

Digitizing or digitization is representing an object, image, document
or a signal (usually an analog signal) by a discrete set of its points
or samples. The result is called "digital representation" or, more
specifically, a "digital image", for the object, and "digital form",
for the signal.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Digitizing

In psychology, visual perception is the ability to interpret
information from visible light reaching the eyes. The resulting
perception is also known as eyesight, sight or vision. The various
physiological components involved in vision are referred to
collectively as the visual system.

On Apr 6, 10:29 am, Immortalist yahoo.com> wrote:

Thats my point, so how comes chazzz knows that what he is seeeeing is
not what he's loooking at?

MG

On Apr 5, 9:11 pm, Michael Gordge xtra.co.nz> wrote:

On Apr 5, 7:42 pm, Michael Gordge xtra.co.nz> wrote:

On Apr 5, 7:11 pm, Michael Gordge xtra.co.nz> wrote:

On Apr 5, 7:11 pm, Michael Gordge xtra.co.nz> wrote:

Custom and memory, both fallible, you see, as far as we know so far.

On Apr 6, 2:09 pm, zinnic gate.net> wrote:

Oh so the eye witness identifications of jets slamming into sky-
scrappers and the resulting collapsing towers can be or were mistaken
as what by you Kantians?

Thats encouraging, sooo what you're seeing is the same as what you're
looking at now?

So now you're saying seeing and looking have near enough to the same
meaning? thats encouraging too!

Perhaps thats why its called the "image in a mirror".

On Apr 6, 2:13 pm, Immortalist yahoo.com> wrote:

But HOW did it get to memory?

His eyes dont lie but his mind does.

Indeed, thats how chazzz became a socialist,
they lie about what their senses sense.

The man with the gun (e.g. the taxman) demanding an
unearned benefit is called a fucking thief to everyone but
the socialists.

MG

On Apr 7, 10:18 pm, Michael Gordge xtra.co.nz> wrote:

Why do you not ask your 'equals' like the 'conspiracy wonks'? You will
feel right at home with those 'scholars'!