Jerry Kraus wrote:
> On Jul 6, 5:01 pm, Day Brown
daybrown.org> wrote:>> The problem Liberals have, is their faith in the equality of races in
>> the face of increasing DNA data to explain the structural and hormonal
>> differences that result in different kinds of performance.
>>
>> Its tragic; they want to do good, but fail because of their own
>> political correct thinking.
>
> There are far more DNA differences between the sexes than between the
> races, Day. But it's very difficult to determine whether men or women
> are the "stronger" sex. You seem to think women are superior, for
> reasons that are not particularly clear to me.
>
> No one can even define what intelligence is. So racial differences in
> intelligence cannot, obviously, be attributed to DNA.
>
> What significant performance differences between the races can be
> attributed to DNA? I'm not aware of any.
>
First of all, on an individual basis, race is not a useful indicator of
intelligence. But when one looks at a gene pool, intelligence and the
hormone profile have an enormous effect on the ratio of alpha to beta
males, and thus the level of violence.
Nature clipped the bell curve for women to ensure competent mothering.
Thus, while men are more often geniuses, if you look in the residential
care facilities, you find that men are also far more often the severe
retards and psychotics.
Another problem has been that dietary deficit and contamination has had
a much more devastating effect on the mental development of boys. This
has also retarded their emotional and intellectual development, so today
we see more women succeed in college, and advance faster in careers to
the point that young women already make more money than young men.
Young men no longer are what you think Jerry. Go to a rave and watch. I
did, and despite being over 60, was bemused to see how many young women
took the time to talk with me. One young woman, just last week, in ref
to the video games said they are nothing but "button pushers". They dont
know anything about relating to young women any more.
With regard to genetics, look up the stats on Saami and Gypsies. They
have all the same high rates of crime, drug abuse, domestic violence and
divorce, as well as the low levels of education and income. German and
Swedish sociologists also reported the young males have an ostentatious
wardrobe, trouble with authority figures, and walk with what we'd call a
"barrior swagger". Only they are as white as me.
the diff is that these two tribes of Native Europeans were nomads
whereas all the other European lines were Yeoman farmers. Nomads, if you
bother to read Campbell, have a very different attitude twards the world
as all 'free range'. The Gypsie dont have a problem with his horses
eating a farmer's wheat. The farmer does. The nomads pay close attention
to relationships and status within the tribe whereas the yeoman watches
the material resources he needs to manage to feed his family.
It results in very different kinds of "intelligence". The nomads pick up
on clues in the body language that go right by a yeoman who must plan a
season or two ahead and thus lives in the future in ways the nomad just
does not get. Some gene pools have more men with higher levels of
adrenalin that speed reflexes, but also increase impulsivity. They also
tend to have lower seratonin, which sharpens senses but make for
restless sleep and grouchy mornings. Low seratonin is also related to
much higher levels of drug and alcohol abuse.
Rather than pretending all gene pools are the same, we'd do well to warn
women what kind of trouble they can expect with kids sired by men whose
hormone profiles are indicative of sociopathology.
