> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fFeMAzWyHQg

> On Jul 4, 10:35 pm, turtoni fastmail.net> wrote:
>

>>http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fFeMAzWyHQg

>
> That was a very interesting video there. Hard to outdo that.
>
> Republicans have devoted a lot of resources to the smearing of
> liberals, but Eric Alterman is not going to let them get away with it.
> He has a mission to correct misconceptions spewed by conservatives and
> regurgitated by mainstream media. ...many others shy away from the
> word because it has been corrupted by conservative political
> activists. Because of the clever, dishonest conservative campaign to
> discredit liberal programs, far too many in the electorate dismiss
> liberal political candidates as unpatriotic, elitist, atheistic, free-
> sex, reverse-racist, murderous (a.k.a. pro-choice) wimps.
>
> Alterman labors mightily to erase the myths and bury the lies pushed
> by antagonists such as Rush Limbaugh, Ann Coulter and others. The
> trouble is that defining liberalism is a difficult matter, which makes ...

> The problem Liberals have, is their faith in the equality of races in
> the face of increasing DNA data to explain the structural and hormonal
> differences that result in different kinds of performance.
>
> Its tragic; they want to do good, but fail because of their own
> political correct thinking.

> On Jul 6, 5:01 pm, Day Brown daybrown.org> wrote:

>> The problem Liberals have, is their faith in the equality of races in
>> the face of increasing DNA data to explain the structural and hormonal
>> differences that result in different kinds of performance.
>>
>> Its tragic; they want to do good, but fail because of their own
>> political correct thinking.

>
> There are far more DNA differences between the sexes than between the
> races, Day. But it's very difficult to determine whether men or women
> are the "stronger" sex. You seem to think women are superior, for
> reasons that are not particularly clear to me.
>
> No one can even define what intelligence is. So racial differences in
> intelligence cannot, obviously, be attributed to DNA.
>
> What significant performance differences between the races can be
> attributed to DNA? I'm not aware of any.
> ...