Bringing Einstein and Lorentz to justice // Newton and Coulomb are wrong, wrong, wrong!
  Home FAQ Contact Sign in
alt.philosophy only
 
Advanced search
POPULAR GROUPS

more...

 Up
Bringing Einstein and Lorentz to justice // Newton and Coulomb are wrong, wrong, wrong!         

Group: alt.philosophy · Group Profile
Author: dedanoe
Date: Sep 11, 2008 01:43

Bringing Einstein and Lorentz to justice

Under the leadership of Einstein's SRT:

t'=(t-V/c x/c)/Sqrt(1-Sqr(V/c))
t=(t'+V/c x'/c)/Sqrt(1-Sqr(V/c))

x'=(x-Vt)/Sqrt(1-Sqr(V/c))
x=(x'+Vt')/Sqrt(1-Sqr(V/c))
---------------------------------
As cited from "General Physics I" SBN: 9989-43006-3, (x, t) and (x',
t') are properties of the moving body in frame K and K'.
=================================
Spanking Einstein's cranky ass:
---------------------------------
x'/t = (x-Vt)/(t'+V/c x'/c) and
x/t' = (x'+Vt')/(t-V/c x/c) ==>

x't'+VSqr(x'/c) = xt-vt^2 and
xt-VSqr(x/c)=x't'+Vt'^2 ==>

x't'-xt=-V(Sqr(x'/c)+t^2) and
x't'-xt=-V(Sqr(x/c)+t'^2) ==>

-(x't'-xt)/V=(t^2+Sqr(x'/c)) and
-(x't'-xt)/V=(t'^2+Sqr(x/c)) ==>

t^2+Sqr(x'/c)=t'^2+Sqr(x/c) ==>

(t-t')(t+t')=(x-x')/c (x+x')/c ==>

V=x/t=c and V'=x'/t'=c

Conclusion: Einstein hacked! He assumes that every speed is speed of
light! # Bring in the next terrorist...

Newton and Coulomb are wrong, wrong, wrong!

Archimedes' statement "magnitudes are in balance on distances
reciprocal to their weights" has no exceptions. Every two weights from
same local brotherhood and under same father-weight mutually interact
directly according to Archimedes' lever law.
=======================================
The lever law divided with time:
(F1 D1 = F2 D2)/time <=> F1 V1 = F2 V2 <=> (F1, V1) = (0, extreme) <=>
(F2, V2) = (extreme, 0)
It reads: subjected to no force the weight preserves its uniform
motion but when it hits the breaks it exerts respective extreme force.
=======================================
Newton II: F = a m should be F = i am i.e. (Force is that i am) where
"i" evens the units left and right. Newton/kg cannot be meter/sec^2
take the lever law for instance F1/D2=F2/D1 same counterparts left and
right or (F1 over F2) pure number equals (D1 under D2) pure number. By
the way, the lever law can be written this way: (F1 = kM1 = sD2 and F2
= kM2 = sD2) where k is simple analogy proportion making M parallel
vector with F.
=======================================
The lever law with D = Distance
F1 D1 = F2 D2 <=> F1 = -F2 iff D1 = -D2
The law of hydraulics with S = Surface
F1 S1 = F2 S2 <=> F1 = -F2 iff S1 = -S2
The law of impacts with V = Volume
F1 V1 = F2 V2 <=> F1 = -F2 iff V1 = -V2
=======================================
Gravity law compatible with the lever law: (F1 = kM1 = sD2 and F2 =
kM2 = sD1)
F1/D2 = F2/D1 = (F1 + F2)/(D1 + D2)
F1 F2 = k^2 M1 M2 = D1 D2 Sqr((F1 + F2)/(D1 + D2))

F1/D2 = F2/D1 = Sqrt(k^2(M1/D1)(M2/D2))

Because Coulomb's electric law is pure clone-copy of Newton's gravity
for formally same reasons, with Q = Charge, the electric law must be:

F1/D2 = F2/D1 = Sqrt(n^2(Q1/D1)(Q2/D2))
=======================================
Prove completed: you have nothing fundamental now!

-----<>-----
/ \
/ Infinity \
/ O O \
| n n |
| e e |
>= <=
| M L |
| o e |
\ r s /
\ e s /
\ Zero /
-----==-----

Unleash death and TAO chaos,
Excellency Dedanoe Unlishnidaos.
http://dedanoe.googlepages.com
1 Comment
diggit! del.icio.us! reddit!