"Michael Gordge" xtra.co.nz> wrote in message
news:38cb3879-7beb-4c2b-914e-80e2e6ee7bac@s19g2000prg.googlegroups.com...
On Jan 4, 8:16 pm, "Tim" qwerty.com> wrote:

That's right, I could never be as stupid as you, in fact I dont think
a janitor could either, or are ewe just pretending to be stupid?

You didn't answer, WHY cant the janitor's hands nose and eyes provide
enough sensory information on their own, to leave the janitor's mind
in no doubt, i.e. they get rid of any mind made assumptions, that a
shit and his brush aint the same form of matter?

MG

------------

You didn't answer how the Randian justifies the claim that plurality follows
from existence, that existence "constitutes a collective noun". I suspect
that the question has gone right over your head, as it did Rand's and
Peikoff's. This leads me to conclude that the typical Objectivist really
lacks a basic understanding of philosophy's task. Instead they are content
to preach their mantras without question, that is dogmatically and
ideologically. They replace an honest line of questioning with
sweet-nothing's about janitors and turds. In so doing they expose themselves
for what they are.