On Jul 23, 5:58 pm, Robert Cohen
msn.com> wrote:> On Jul 23, 2:05 pm, Immortalist
yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>>> On Jul 22, 4:14 pm, Robert Cohen
msn.com> wrote:>
>>> nbc-tv network, usa, tonight reports ten of the bbc's administrators
>>> and some employees have been accused of deliberately telling outright
>>> lies, rigging quiz show(s), and others
>
>>> so, the british broadcasting corporation is merely another all too
>>> human institution that's not invulnerable to corruption?
>
>> Can you explain how you came to the impression and expectation that
>> BBC is/was not an all too human institution that isn't vulnerable to
>> corruption?
>
>>> and edward r murrow weeps
>>> london to the usa, sorta like voice of deity>
>
>
>> - Show quoted text
>
> the bbc is looked upon & respected as the voice and messenger/message
> of anglo-saxon civilization throughout the world---at least that's
> been my subjective perception, which we know is often absurd (as you
> imply)
>
> particularly, during various international crises, the bbc world news
> is ...sort of sacrosanct truth compared to the local controlled "media
> propagandists"
>
How many problems should there be before one changes his or her
opinion about the status of such organizations. This so that any
improvement by other bad news organizations, for the better, can be
properly judged. Since an organization can be downgraded in status one
might think that organizations could be upgraded. Or are they marked
for life, once downgraded.
> therefore, it's (to me and perhaps others) dis-heartening to realize
> they're imperfect like everybody
>
> so, i cynically hereaby acknowledge the concept of "scandal" is as
> universal and natural as the queen's horse horse-appling in public- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
