On Jan 29, 8:22 am, Malrassic Park hotmail.com> wrote:

Oh so Melon wants a quote from Flood.

"Rand's curt dismissal of her anti-sensist critics begged the question
of the role of sensation in knowledge and thereby rendered her guilty
of "theory-stealing" and of abandoning rigorous argumentation for the
pleasures of dogmatic assertion."

Hey Melon, how the fuck does dismissing the cannibalized mind beg any
question?

This fucking Anthony Flood twat can not even work out, in his own dumb
numb cannibalised mind, that in order to condemn Rand, her work has to
"exist" for him to read, to SENSE, reason (thats the step the idiot
missed) and condemn (thats the bit he's whimmed true).

Fancy trying to condemn Rand because she curtly dismissed the cause of
mystical bullshit, because she dismissed the ideas giving rise to jets
being slammed into sky-scrapers, because she dismissed cannibalising
the mind as a means to knowledge.

Flood, the envy ridden leftist mystical idiot, condemns Rand because
she curtly dismissed the epistemology of faith.

Flood's own dopey epistemology commanded him to condemn the ONLY thing
that is possible to reason and that is "EXISTENSE" e.g. reading or
hearing Rand's ideas.

The stupid dopey Kantian Floods's of this world so desperately want
and need you to believe that you can reason what is in their minds
BEFORE they have told or written or acted their dopey thoughts out.

Of course the anti-sensist must be curtly dismissed, reason by
definition demands that you do.

Michael Gordge