> Practically each one of us is wondering whether God does exist,
> whether we have eternal soul, what is the goal of our existence, what
> awaits the humanity in a near future, how we should act in our lives,
> etc., etc. I also belong to the group of people asking this kind of
> questions. But there is a significant difference between myself and
> others who ask. After all, because I am a professional scientist, I
> managed to find not only the answer to these questions, but also
> identify a wealth of scientific evidence which confirms that my answer
> is this correct one.
>
> Probably I am the only researcher on the Earth who have found a key to
> the scientific understanding of God (see the web page named "god.htm")
> and to a rational getting to know this superior being with the use of
> modern scientific methods. This key turned out to be the "theory of
> everything" called the "Concept of Dipolar Gravity (see the web page
> named "dipolar_gravity.htm"). It is because of this "theory of
> everything", that I managed to determine where, when, and how the self-
> evolution of God took place. Outcomes of this determination are
> described in item #B1 of the web page "evolution.htm" - about problems
> of natural evolution. It is also because of this "theory of
> everything", that I managed to formulate several formal scientific
> proofs for the existence of God, immortal soul, other world, etc.
> These formal proofs are described: in item #B3 of the web page
> "god.htm" - about secular and scientific understanding of God (see in
> there the "formal scientific proof for the existence of God"), in item
> #C1.1 of the web page "nirvana.htm" - about the totaliztic nirvana
> (see in there the "formal scientific proof for the existence of
> eternal human soul"), in item #D3 of the web page
> "dipolar_gravity.htm" - about the Concept of Dipolar Gravity (see in
> there the "formal scientific proof for the existence of the counter-
> world"), and in several further totaliztic web pages (see the web page
> named "totalizm.htm"). Only because of findings of this "theory of
> everything" I was also able to indicate to other people an entire
> wealth of empirical evidence for the existence of God, which (the
> scientific evidence) so-far was either overlooked, or intentionally
> ignored by the official human science. (Descriptions of this empirical
> evidence are provided in items #F1 to #F3 of the totaliztic web page
> "bible.htm" - about the Bible authorised by God Himself.)
>
> When formulating these formal scientific proofs for the existence of
> God, and while researching God with scientific methods, I had numerous
> opportunities to have a close look at what would happen if all people
> unanimously recognised my proofs and rapidly started to believe (as
> strongly as I do) that God in fact does exist. A positive consequence
> of such a rapid converting of all atheists into the belief in God
> would be, of course, that almost instantly all people would begin to
> act morally. Means, that would disappear: crime, lies, cheating,
> killing, exploitation, wars, etc., etc. However, in the present
> situation of our civilisation, when people still just only "worship
> God" instead of researching Him and instead of obeying laws that He
> established, various undesirable consequences of such unanimous belief
> in God would also appear. Namely, almost completely would then
> diminish the accumulation of knowledge and the human motivation to
> investigate the universe. After all, in present circumstances, for so-
> called "typical bread eaters" the consequence of being sure that God
> does exist is to loose the motivations for investigating and for
> analysing the world around us. For every question about anything, for
> these ones who strongly believe in God is just a single reply, namely
> "because God created it so and He controls it in just such a manner".
> Believers in God notoriously keep ignoring the well-known principle
> that "God helps only those people who help themselves", and that by
> failing to act even saints get nowhere. In order to summarise the
> above, "typical consequences of increasing the faith in God in present
> circumstances are: an increase in morality of people, which is
> accompanied by the simultaneous decrease in knowledge, disappearance
> of scientific research, and the lack of motivation for creative
> searches".
>
> Of course, if these are us who put ourselves in the position of God,
> we would NOT like the situation when all people believe in Us and all
> people worship Us, when all people act morally, but simultaneously the
> progress of knowledge and technology rapidly falls down. After all, in
> such a situation the human civilisation would never advance to a
> higher level of development. So in our interest as God, would lie
> finding a way to inspire in people somehow the creative searches and
> the increase in their knowledge. As it turns out, this way depends on
> persuading some people into the so-called "atheism". Atheists from the
> very definition are forced to find out which mechanisms hide behind
> events around them. After all, they negate God as the source of these
> mechanisms. As such, the "atheism" is the propelling force for the
> progress of knowledge and for the technical development of our
> civilisation. Unfortunately, the "atheism" has this drawback, that it
> causes also a moral decadency. This is because without believing in
> the existence of God and without believing in the existence of eternal
> soul, atheists try to gain from the life as much as they only can for
> as little as they manage to get away with. But since the morality
> stands on their way, then to hell with the morality. In order to
> summarise the above, "typical consequence of "atheism" is the increase
> of knowledge and the fast technical progress, which, however, is
> accompanied by the simultaneous drop in the level of morality amongst
> people".
>
> Each one amongst two situations on the Earth described before has its
> drawbacks. Namely, if all people are believers in God, then the
> science, progress, and motivations of people to improve their
> situation would diminish on the Earth, while the average level of
> morality would increase. In turn, if all people on the Earth were
> atheists, then the science and technology would bloom, while the
> morality would fell down. The main reason is, that when something
> undesirable affects believers in God, these typically state that this
> is the "God's will" and do NOTHING to improve their situation. In turn
> when something undesirable affects atheists, then they try to
> determine what are reasons for this and then they fight with it. So
> what God should do in order to make the humanity to stay on the path
> of morality, but simultaneously people keep motivations to continue
> research, progress, and improvement of their situations. Well, on the
> present level of human awareness, the only choice is that "a correct
> balance between the number of people who believe in God, and the
> number of atheists, must be maintained on the Earth". Expressing this
> in other words, if someone puts himself into the position of God
> (means speaking scientifically - if someone would "simulate the
> situation of God") then he would discover easily that God to the same
> degree is interested in a correctly balanced propagation amongst
> present people both the "atheism" as well as the "belief in God". In
> turn the best evidence for this interest of God in a balanced
> propagation of both, atheism and the belief in God, is the so-called
> "free will" of people, and also the so-called "canon of ambiguity"
> which God displays in everything that He does. The "free will" which
> God gave to all people causes that each one of us has the right to
> interpret everything on any way that he or she wishes. In turn the
> "canon of ambiguity", which is embedded into every action of God,
> depends on such doing everything God decides to do, that every person
> can interpret later this God's action according to his or her own view
> of the world and according to his or her personal philosophy - means
> in any way that a given person wishes to interpret it. (Please notice
> that descriptions of the "canon of ambiguity" are provided in
> subsection JB7.4 from volume 7 of monograph [1/4] ?available free of
> charge from the totaliztic web page named "xext_1_4.htm".)
>
> Unfortunately, the maintenance of the correct balance on the Earth
> between the number of atheists and the number of believers in God, is
> immensely difficult. After all, people display so-called "sheep
> mentality". Furthermore, on the Earth works inertia, fashion,
> tradition, etc. Therefore, every now and again this healthy balance
> becomes disturbed. So what God does in such cases. Well, he must take
> various corrective measures. What these measures are we already saw in
> the period of medieval times, and we also are starting to see it in
> the present time. After all, similarly like previously this happened
> already once near the end of antiquity, just recently again the
> disturbance of this healthy balance took place. In the result of this
> disturbed balance, the number of atheists grew to the level that it
> endangers the moral progress of humanity. So God again must intervene,
> and in fact He already intervenes. But He cannot appear openly in the
> sky and start to electrocute atheists with lightnings. After all this
> would destroy the "free will" of people - and thus would force every
> atheists to become a believer in God. In the result another fall down
> of progress in lifting knowledge and technology would take place in
> the future of the Earth. Therefore God have chosen another method for
> restoration of the balance. It is based on an old finding which is
> excellently expressed by the proverb which states that "there are no
> atheists amongst frightened". This method represents only a slight
> modification of the method that God already used once on the humanity
> during medieval times. In a short run it is going to turn very painful
> for individual people. But on a long run it is going to turn very
> beneficial for the entire human civilisation. The totaliztic web page
> named ...
>
> read more �