Practically each one of us is wondering whether God does exist,
whether we have eternal soul, what is the goal of our existence, what
awaits the humanity in a near future, how we should act in our lives,
etc., etc. I also belong to the group of people asking this kind of
questions. But there is a significant difference between myself and
others who ask. After all, because I am a professional scientist, I
managed to find not only the answer to these questions, but also
identify a wealth of scientific evidence which confirms that my answer
is this correct one.

Probably I am the only researcher on the Earth who have found a key to
the scientific understanding of God (see the web page named "god.htm")
and to a rational getting to know this superior being with...

On Sun, 27 Apr 2008 20:21:32 -0700 (PDT), janpajak@gmail.com wrote:

Speak for yourself, pig-ignorant liar who pretends he is too stupid to
understand that it's merely somebody else's religious belief.

[220 lines of in-your-face, mindless bullshit deleted]

On Apr 28, 1:21 pm, janpa...@gmail.com wrote:

I am not interested in those.

what is the goal of our existence, what

Those are the impotant questions.

You cannot use science to answer non scientific questions.

On Sun, 27 Apr 2008 20:21:32 -0700 (PDT), janpajak@gmail.com wrote:

"John 'IBen' Baker" bizniz.net> wrote in message
news:6bia14t1digq6lo4c011bvfgpv04fvo1e4@4ax.com...

You're so full of shit, IBen. When you say you'll someone, that
usually means you'll become obsessed with him

One fine day in alt.atheism, janpajak@gmail.com wrote:

I'm one of those who doesn't bother, given the lack of evidence available.
Why did you cross post this into alt.atheism? Trolling?

On Apr 28, 3:42 pm, Richo gmail.com> wrote:
...

...
Since when questions concerning God are declared "non scientific". Is
it from the time when your personal definition of what science should
do, or should NOT do, becomes imposed on the entire scientific
fratermity? I am a professional scientist myself and I do ask, and
also do answer, these type of questions. What even more important, my
answers to these questions are based on scientifically verifiable
evidence and on logical deductions. If you do not believe, then have a
look at other threads that I am authorising, e.g. at the threads:

http://groups.google.com/group/sci.logic/browse_thread/thread/3511120c588e0a16/6...#6c4ba1babcee49b5
- which contains the formal scientific proof that "God does exist"
completed with methods of mathematical logic,

http://groups.google.com/group/sci.logic/browse_thread/thread/9d7e62b9be872ac3/2...#2d70a1621314beb6
- which contains the formal scientific proof that "another world (in
which God lives) does exist" completed with methods of mathematical
logic,

On Sun, 27 Apr 2008 21:55:04 -0700 (PDT), janpajak@gmail.com wrote:

Where did you demonstrate there was anything to have questions about,
in the real world outside your religion, moron?

janpajak@gmail.com wrote:

Then you'd know that science is anything that can be tested, observed,
predicted, and repeated.

Please show how these steps can be applied to God. How do we test God?
How do we observe God? How do we predict God? How can we repeat those
results?

On Apr 28, 2:55 pm, janpa...@gmail.com wrote:

Think on this:
You have in front of you two statues.
One of them is regarded by the makers of the statue as holy - they
sincerely believe that the divine is present in it - the other is an
art work that no living person regards as holy.
What scientific principle would you employ to distinguish the divine
statue from the non divine statue.

Or you could be delusional.