|
|
 Up |
|
|
  |
Author: RH Nigl / GH DielRH Nigl / GH Diel Date: Nov 21, 2007 10:05
Art is not 'Art' because it is beautiful, it is 'beautiful' because it is a
highly organized human activity resulting in a conceptually complete
product, or even a conceptually complete idea, like any other highly
organized human activity: mathematics, music, mechanics, dance, language,
writing, and on and on.
R H Nigl
Contrary to: http://www.livescience.com/history/071121-beauty-brain.html
|
| |
|
| | 35 Comments |
|
|
Author: ArtArt Date: Nov 21, 2007 10:42
On Wed, 21 Nov 2007 13:05:20 -0500, "RH Nigl / GH Diel"
exoptica.com> wrote:
>Art is not 'Art' because it is beautiful, it is 'beautiful' because it is a
>highly organized human activity resulting in a conceptually complete
>product, or even a conceptually complete idea, like any other highly
>organized human activity: mathematics, music, mechanics, dance, language,
>writing, and on and on.
>
>R H Nigl
>
>Contrary to: http://www.livescience.com/history/071121-beauty-brain.html
That link is a good example of the garbage that continually spews
forth from scientists having materialistic philosophical bias. Those
clowns never tire of spewing out their "hard wired into the brain"
beliefs.
Art
http://home.epix.net/~artnpeg
|
| |
|
| | no comments |
|
|
Author: WordsmithWordsmith Date: Nov 21, 2007 11:23
On Nov 21, 11:05 am, "RH Nigl / GH Diel" exoptica.com> wrote:> Art is not 'Art' because it is beautiful, it is 'beautiful' because it is a
> highly organized human activity resulting in a conceptually complete
> product, or even a conceptually complete idea, like any other highly
> organized human activity: mathematics, music, mechanics, dance, language,
> writing, and on and on.
>
> R H Nigl
>
> Contrary to:http://www.livescience.com/history/071121-beauty-brain.html
Art is well-nigh impossible to define...and maybe it's better that
way.
W : )
|
| |
| no comments |
|
|
Date: Nov 21, 2007 11:48
"RH Nigl / GH Diel" exoptica.com> wrote in message
news:oPydnd5gsJDp7tnanZ2dnUVZ_h-vnZ2d@adelphia.com...> Art is not 'Art' because it is beautiful, it is 'beautiful' because it is
> a highly organized human activity resulting in a conceptually complete
> product, or even a conceptually complete idea, like any other highly
> organized human activity: mathematics, music, mechanics, dance, language,
> writing, and on and on.
>
> R H Nigl
>
> Contrary to: http://www.livescience.com/history/071121-beauty-brain.html
Why do we find certain shapes, compositions and colors compelling? Could it
be through a certain ineffable emotion which is evoked when we see certain
shapes, composition, colors? For the moment, let us call them forms. I
propose that humans observe certain forms and the sensing is not available
to the language center or the rational part of the mind, however they do
experience a certain kind of attractive emotion (ineffable). Why? Emotion
associated with the recognition of certain shapes accelerates learning. It
is derived from survival mechanisms.
|
| Show full article (1.24Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: LedraychereLedraychere Date: Nov 21, 2007 11:59
On Nov 21, 2:23 pm, Wordsmith rocketmail.com> wrote:> On Nov 21, 11:05 am, "RH Nigl / GH Diel" exoptica.com> wrote:
>>> Art is not 'Art' because it is beautiful, it is 'beautiful' because it is a
>> highly organized human activity resulting in a conceptually complete
>> product, or even a conceptually complete idea, like any other highly
>> organized human activity: mathematics, music, mechanics, dance, language,
>> writing, and on and on.
>
>> R H Nigl
>
>
> Art is well-nigh impossible to define...and maybe it's better that
> way.
>
> W : )
Art is one of the easiest concepts in the Universe
to define . Like all things that would be eternal ,
and Art to have any value to the human species
must be eternal .
...
|
| Show full article (1.65Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: brian fletcherbrian fletcher Date: Nov 21, 2007 15:26
"Art" zilch.com> wrote in message
news:gju8k31pl6bivppvm1psntbagl1mgso804@4ax.com...> On Wed, 21 Nov 2007 13:05:20 -0500, "RH Nigl / GH Diel"
> exoptica.com> wrote:
>>>Art is not 'Art' because it is beautiful, it is 'beautiful' because it is
>>a
>>highly organized human activity resulting in a conceptually complete
>>product, or even a conceptually complete idea, like any other highly
>>organized human activity: mathematics, music, mechanics, dance, language,
>>writing, and on and on.
>>
>>R H Nigl
>>
>>Contrary to: http://www.livescience.com/history/071121-beauty-brain.html>
> That link is a good example of the garbage that continually spews
> forth from scientists having materialistic philosophical bias. Those
> clowns never tire of spewing out their "hard wired into the brain"
> beliefs. ...
|
| Show full article (1.06Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: brian fletcherbrian fletcher Date: Nov 21, 2007 15:27
> On Nov 21, 11:05 am, "RH Nigl / GH Diel" exoptica.com> wrote:>> Art is not 'Art' because it is beautiful, it is 'beautiful' because it is
>> a
>> highly organized human activity resulting in a conceptually complete
>> product, or even a conceptually complete idea, like any other highly
>> organized human activity: mathematics, music, mechanics, dance, language,
>> writing, and on and on.
>>
>> R H Nigl
>>
>> Contrary to:http://www.livescience.com/history/071121-beauty-brain.html>
> Art is well-nigh impossible to define...and maybe it's better that
> way.
>
> W : )
|
| Show full article (0.84Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: WordsmithWordsmith Date: Nov 21, 2007 15:35
On Nov 21, 4:27 pm, "brian fletcher" bigpond.net.au> wrote:>> On Nov 21, 11:05 am, "RH Nigl / GH Diel" exoptica.com> wrote:>>> Art is not 'Art' because it is beautiful, it is 'beautiful' because it is
>>> a
>>> highly organized human activity resulting in a conceptually complete
>>> product, or even a conceptually complete idea, like any other highly
>>> organized human activity: mathematics, music, mechanics, dance, language,
>>> writing, and on and on.
>
>>> R H Nigl
>
|
| Show full article (0.98Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: brian fletcherbrian fletcher Date: Nov 21, 2007 15:34
> On Nov 21, 2:23 pm, Wordsmith rocketmail.com> wrote:>> On Nov 21, 11:05 am, "RH Nigl / GH Diel" exoptica.com> wrote:
>>>>> Art is not 'Art' because it is beautiful, it is 'beautiful' because it
>>> is a
>>> highly organized human activity resulting in a conceptually complete
>>> product, or even a conceptually complete idea, like any other highly
>>> organized human activity: mathematics, music, mechanics, dance,
>>> language,
>>> writing, and on and on.
>>
>>> R H Nigl
>>
>>
>> Art is well-nigh impossible to define...and maybe it's better that
>> way.
>> ...
|
| Show full article (2.35Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
|
|
|
Author: brian fletcherbrian fletcher Date: Nov 21, 2007 15:36
> "RH Nigl / GH Diel" exoptica.com> wrote in message
> news:oPydnd5gsJDp7tnanZ2dnUVZ_h-vnZ2d@adelphia.com...>> Art is not 'Art' because it is beautiful, it is 'beautiful' because it is
>> a highly organized human activity resulting in a conceptually complete
>> product, or even a conceptually complete idea, like any other highly
>> organized human activity: mathematics, music, mechanics, dance, language,
>> writing, and on and on.
>>
>> R H Nigl
>>
>> Contrary to: http://www.livescience.com/history/071121-beauty-brain.html>
> Why do we find certain shapes, compositions and colors compelling? Could
> it be through a certain ineffable emotion which is evoked when we see
> certain shapes, composition, colors? For the moment, let us call them
> forms. I propose that humans observe certain forms and the sensing is not
> available to the language center or the rational part of the mind, however
> they do experience a certain kind of attractive emotion (ineffable). Why? ...
|
| Show full article (1.43Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
|
|
