Re: Argument for the existence of God, take your best shot
  Home FAQ Contact Sign in
alt.philosophy only
 
Advanced search
POPULAR GROUPS

more...

 Up
Re: Argument for the existence of God, take your best shot         

Group: alt.philosophy · Group Profile
Author: chazwin
Date: Dec 10, 2006 15:25

Hey Citizen Bob !!!! Cowardly WANKER!!!

Fine have it your way.. Captialise or not.
Answer the points I made.
Or are you too scared..
TO remind you ...

If you want me to adopt a "world view" to counter your argument then I
shall counter it with your own."Supreme Being" has captialised letter
theis indicates that it is a personality. By your own words this Being
is not like the Christian god in this respect so does not exist.

If you decapitalise on supreme being what in my own existential realism

am I left with?
What is ER? ER is the creative act of giving shape and form to the
demonic and angelic images that lie within the shadowland of our living

essence; the unknown anxiety of despair and meaninglessness in the face

of our non-being. It is an application of aristic endevaour.
There is no such thing as ER as a philospohical movement.
Existentialism, however, is a philosophical movement that rejects
that life has an inherent meaning, but instead requires each individual

to posit his or her own subjective values. As a branch or evolution of
phenomenolgy it is a means to seek freedom from the ties of objectivism

in order to more easily come to a personal understanding of the world
by means of personal experience and the personal interpretation of that

personal experience..

One presumes that ER then assumes that this existential view point is
"real". That one's personal world view is THE world view; tha the
phenomona one attributes to sense perceptions and other forms of
evidence are the only ones that count. One's personal take on the world
becomes the real world.
Thus I shall employ this Existential realism to refute your claim. I
counter your argument with your own Worldview. As a personal view I
hereby re-instate physics, though it has no particular bearing on the
existence of the "Suprem Being" or the "supreme being". As my personal
existential experience denies both of these concepts I simply dispense
with them forthwith. I have no basis in phenomenological terms to
accept their ontology and cannot see why anyone else would imagine they

exist. I classify them with all other deities and theoi.
no comments
diggit! del.icio.us! reddit!