|
|
 Up |
|
|
  |
Author: chazwinchazwin Date: Dec 16, 2007 15:59
On Dec 16, 9:06 pm, Robert Cohen msn.com> wrote:> you've heard this: ' the usa has more coal than OPEC blah bluh'
>
> as per the usual, i am undecided, especially after glancing thru a
> gratuitously dismal slide show and accompanying text
>
> these ugly and depressing arguments are apparently by some green
> opponents of the coal industry
>
> for imajor instance:
>
> they claim the successful underground sequestration of carbon dioxide
> is actually fifteen years away
>
> who (which side) is fudging and telling the most lies?
>
> damneit to hades
>
> http://www.alternet.org/stories/70475/?page=1
|
| Show full article (1.15Kb) |
|
| | 139 Comments |
|
|
Author: chazwinchazwin Date: Dec 18, 2007 01:42
On Dec 17, 6:35 pm, tg earthlink.net> wrote:> On Dec 16, 6:59 pm, chazwin yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>>> On Dec 16, 9:06 pm, Robert Cohen msn.com> wrote:>
>>> you've heard this: ' the usa has more coal than OPEC blah bluh'
>
>>> as per the usual, i am undecided, especially after glancing thru a
>>> gratuitously dismal slide show and accompanying text
>
>>> these ugly and depressing arguments are apparently by some green
>>> opponents of the coal industry
>
>>> for imajor instance:
>
>>> they claim the successful underground sequestration of carbon dioxide ...
|
| Show full article (4.90Kb) |
|
| | 13 Comments |
|
|
Author: Michael GordgeMichael Gordge Date: Dec 18, 2007 02:14
On Dec 18, 6:42 pm, chazwin yahoo.com> wrote:
Not a post chazzzz, a few mistakes in your reasoning, but on the whole
honest and notice how you used facts and figures which exist in
reality independent and regardless of your state of mind.
Your state of mind, in its reasoning process, only had to sort through
the trash which your eyes (one of your sense) had read to activate the
sorting process.
The meanings of the words your eyes read were of course pre-learnt, I
digress.
Again well done, to your eyes anyway, for sending information to your
mind so as your mind could be triggered into reasoning.
As you have just shown your eyes are not after all, painted
decorations, they activated your mind to reason what they were
sensing.
MG
|
| |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: tgtg Date: Dec 18, 2007 03:30
On Dec 18, 4:42 am, chazwin yahoo.com> wrote:> On Dec 17, 6:35 pm, tg earthlink.net> wrote:
>
>
>>> On Dec 16, 6:59 pm, chazwin yahoo.com> wrote:>
>>> On Dec 16, 9:06 pm, Robert Cohen msn.com> wrote:>
>>>> you've heard this: ' the usa has more coal than OPEC blah bluh'
>
>>>> as per the usual, i am undecided, especially after glancing thru a
>>>> gratuitously dismal slide show and accompanying text
>
>>>> these ugly and depressing arguments are apparently by some green
>>>> opponents of the coal industry
>
>>>> for imajor instance:
>
>>>> they claim the successful underground sequestration of carbon dioxide ...
|
| Show full article (7.09Kb) |
| 5 Comments |
|
|
Author: chazwinchazwin Date: Dec 18, 2007 09:13
On Dec 18, 11:30 am, tg earthlink.net> wrote:> On Dec 18, 4:42 am, chazwin yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>>> On Dec 17, 6:35 pm, tg earthlink.net> wrote:>
>>> On Dec 16, 6:59 pm, chazwin yahoo.com> wrote:>
>>>> On Dec 16, 9:06 pm, Robert Cohen msn.com> wrote:>
>>>>> you've heard this: ' the usa has more coal than OPEC blah bluh'
>
>>>>> as per the usual, i am undecided, especially after glancing thru a
>>>>> gratuitously dismal slide show and accompanying text
>
>>>>> these ugly and depressing arguments are apparently by some green
>>>>> opponents of the coal industry ...
|
| Show full article (10.42Kb) |
| 27 Comments |
|
|
Author: tgtg Date: Dec 18, 2007 11:39
On Dec 18, 12:13 pm, chazwin yahoo.com> wrote:> On Dec 18, 11:30 am, tg earthlink.net> wrote:
>>> On Dec 18, 4:42 am, chazwin yahoo.com> wrote:>
>>> On Dec 17, 6:35 pm, tg earthlink.net> wrote:>
>>>> On Dec 16, 6:59 pm, chazwin yahoo.com> wrote:>
>>>>> On Dec 16, 9:06 pm, Robert Cohen msn.com> wrote:>
>>>>>> you've heard this: ' the usa has more coal than OPEC blah bluh'
>
>>>>>> as per the usual, i am undecided, especially after glancing thru a
>>>>>> gratuitously dismal slide show and accompanying text
>
>>>>>> these ugly and depressing arguments are apparently by some green
>>>>>> opponents of the coal industry
>
>>>>>> for imajor instance: ...
|
| Show full article (2.75Kb) |
| 14 Comments |
|
|
Author: Fred WeissFred Weiss Date: Dec 18, 2007 11:53
On Dec 18, 12:13 pm, chazwin yahoo.com> wrote:> On Dec 18, 11:30 am, tg earthlink.net> wrote:>> Given the current human population, adaptation is just not that easy.
>> You can't pick up wheat fields and transport them North when they
>> stop being productive, you can't build a dike around Bangladesh, you
>> just can't fix these things except at enormous cost, because of the
>> time scale.
>
> Irrelevant!
And false.
The US was transformed in a mere 100 years from an essentially log
cabin wilderness with most of its population hugging the East Coast
into an industrial powerhouse criss-crossed with railroads and a
population spanning the continent.
There have been vast population shifts in the last 100yrs., first
South to North and now North to South.
Adaption has been going on for a very long time and sometimes quite
rapidly (look at how the gold rush transformed San Francisco in just a
few years) - and, if anything, it is far, far easier today.
|
| Show full article (1.10Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: tgtg Date: Dec 18, 2007 14:59
On Dec 18, 5:45 pm, chazwin yahoo.com> wrote:> On Dec 18, 7:39 pm, tg earthlink.net> wrote:
>
>
>>> On Dec 18, 12:13 pm, chazwin yahoo.com> wrote:>
>>> On Dec 18, 11:30 am, tg earthlink.net> wrote:>
>>>> On Dec 18, 4:42 am, chazwin yahoo.com> wrote:>
>>>>> On Dec 17, 6:35 pm, tg earthlink.net> wrote:>
>>>>>> On Dec 16, 6:59 pm, chazwin yahoo.com> wrote:>
>>>>>>> On Dec 16, 9:06 pm, Robert Cohen msn.com> wrote:>
>>>>>>>> you've heard this: ' the usa has more coal than OPEC blah bluh'
>
>>>>>>>> as per the usual, i am undecided, especially after glancing thru a ...
|
| Show full article (4.14Kb) |
| 19 Comments |
|
|
Author: tgtg Date: Dec 18, 2007 15:37
On Dec 18, 6:23 pm, chazwin yahoo.com> wrote:> On Dec 18, 10:59 pm, tg earthlink.net> wrote:
>
>
>>> On Dec 18, 5:45 pm, chazwin yahoo.com> wrote:>
>>> On Dec 18, 7:39 pm, tg earthlink.net> wrote:>
>>>> On Dec 18, 12:13 pm, chazwin yahoo.com> wrote:>
>>>>> On Dec 18, 11:30 am, tg earthlink.net> wrote:>
>>>>>> On Dec 18, 4:42 am, chazwin yahoo.com> wrote:>
>>>>>>> On Dec 17, 6:35 pm, tg earthlink.net> wrote:>
>>>>>>>> On Dec 16, 6:59 pm, chazwin yahoo.com> wrote:>
>>>>>>>>> On Dec 16, 9:06 pm, Robert Cohen msn.com> wrote: ...
|
| Show full article (5.31Kb) |
| 30 Comments |
|
|
|
|
|
Author: Michael GordgeMichael Gordge Date: Dec 18, 2007 18:47
On Dec 19, 7:47 am, chazwin yahoo.com> wrote:
> Not "per capita" though are they? They might be the greatest polluters
> by only by virtue of the fact that their populations far outweigh
> every other human group on earth.
> Where did you get your figures?
Seeeee chazzz not even you can reason facts about pollution unless and
until your eyes have sensed something external of your mind to trigger
your reasoning process.
Contrary to what you have allowed your mind to be poisoned with, not
even your knowledge of space and time was triggered by your mind.
The mind triggering the mind is the retarded chewing its hands off.
The mind not being fed sensory data through the faculty of sense to
then be sorted, is the mind eating itself to death, hence the saying
*brain dead*.
MG
|
| |
| no comments |
|
|
|
|
