Another Puppy On sci.electronics.basics Gets House Trained
  Home FAQ Contact Sign in
alt.philosophy only
 
Advanced search
POPULAR GROUPS

more...

alt.philosophy Profile…
 Up
Re: Another Puppy On sci.electronics.basics Gets House Trained         


Author: Rod Speed
Date: Aug 5, 2008 20:44

Immortalist yahoo.com> wrote
> Rod Speed gmail.com> wrote
>> Kevin Aylward kevinaylward.co.uk> wrote
>>> Rod Speed wrote
>>>> Bret Cahill aol.com> wrote
>>>>>>>>>> Which project?
>>>>>> All of them, since they are likely all as poorly presented as the one I specifically had in mind
>>>>> How do you know with seeing them?
>>>>> Are you suggesting that great inventors sometimes don't occasionally have bad ideas?
>>>> Nope. You are nothing even remotely resembling anything
>>>> like a great inventor, child. Just a pathetic wanker, actually.
>>>>> To the contrary, the bad ideas of most successful inventors greatly out number the good ideas.
>>>> Thats just plain wrong too.
>>>>> Edison went through 10,000 bad ideas before getting a light bulb.
>>>> You've plucked that number out of your arse too. We can tell that by the smell.
>>>>> Successful inventors just try so many things they can select and choose the good ones.
>>>> Some do, plenty dont.
>>>>> You have really demonstrated you are ignorant of the design process.
>>>> You in spades above, child.
Show full article (2.94Kb)
no comments
Re: Another Puppy On sci.electronics.basics Gets House Trained         


Author: Bret Cahill
Date: Aug 5, 2008 21:30

>> Now I need a way to house train 'em by the dozen.

This is working out better than the sabotage in _Confederacy of
Dunces_.

Bret Cahill
no comments
Re: Another Puppy On sci.electronics.basics Gets House Trained         


Author: Immortalist
Date: Aug 5, 2008 22:03

> > belongs>
>

Some science is like some creative methods in other areas of life,
while not all scientific discovery is creative. The idea is that there
is a plural field of items and then method is applied and some are
eliminated. Just like in evolution.

When you said
>>New ideas are nothing like random variations.

that is taken to mean that "no ideas are ideas that are absolutely
ever in any way similar to random variations" and this would first off
imply omniscience by you since all ideas have not been thought or had
yet, but here you are making predictions like you cannot be wrong.
That be a no no in logic. In the second place much research has been
done when scientists set back and let their minds wander and the
solution is selected out from the noise.

Therefore it is not the case that the positions I offered "has
absolutely nothing to with what was being discussed" and consequently
you have been shown to be wrong and in error.
Show full article (2.43Kb)
no comments
Re: Another Puppy On sci.electronics.basics Gets House Trained         


Author: Rod Speed
Date: Aug 5, 2008 22:21

Immortalist yahoo.com> wrote:
> Some science is like some creative methods in other areas of life,

Very little of it is in fact.
> while not all scientific discovery is creative.

Not much of it is in fact.
> The idea is that there is a plural field of items and
> then method is applied and some are eliminated.

Thats nothing like what the fool claimed.
> Just like in evolution.

Nope, not on the generation of the items it isnt.
> When you said
>>> New ideas are nothing like random variations.
> that is taken to mean that "no ideas are ideas that are
> absolutely ever in any way similar to random variations"

I never ever said anything like that.
> and this would first off imply omniscience by you
> since all ideas have not been thought or had yet,

Wrong again.
> but here you are making predictions like you cannot be wrong.
Show full article (1.86Kb)
no comments
Re: Another Puppy On sci.electronics.basics Gets House Trained         


Author: Rod Speed
Date: Aug 5, 2008 22:22

Bret Cahill aol.com> wrote
>>> Now I need a way to house train 'em by the dozen.
> This is working out better than the sabotage in _Confederacy of Dunces_.

Just another of your pathetic little drug crazed mud stained fantasys, child.
no comments
Re: Another Puppy On sci.electronics.basics Gets House Trained         


Author: Don Bowey
Date: Aug 5, 2008 22:41

On 8/5/08 9:30 PM, in article
86a792d1-e2bc-4663-b73c-80ae06085316@v26g2000prm.googlegroups.com, "Bret
Cahill" aol.com> wrote:
>>> Now I need a way to house train 'em by the dozen.
>
> This is working out better than the sabotage in _Confederacy of
> Dunces_.
>
>
> Bret Cahill
>
>

You seem to have a lot of fun commenting on your own posts. Do you grin and
drool while doing it?
no comments
Re: Another Puppy On sci.electronics.basics Gets House Trained         


Author: Bret Cahill
Date: Aug 5, 2008 22:55

>>>> Now I need a way to house train 'em by the dozen.
>> This is working out better than the sabotage in _Confederacy of
>> Dunces_.
>> Bret Cahill
> You seem to have a lot of fun commenting on your own posts.

It ain't like you are bright enough to have a response.

Care to try again?

Bret Cahill
no comments
Re: Another Puppy On sci.electronics.basics Gets House Trained         


Author: Immortalist
Date: Aug 5, 2008 22:57

On Aug 5, 10:21 pm, "Rod Speed" gmail.com> wrote:
> Immortalist yahoo.com> wrote:
>> Some science is like some creative methods in other areas of life,
>
> Very little of it is in fact.
>

You concession hardily accepted that at least some science involve
creative methods.
>> while not all scientific discovery is creative.
>
> Not much of it is in fact.
>

At least you can admit you were wrong when you perceived that you
were, by accepting that "some" is more appropriate than "all" in the
stated case against you.
Show full article (7.28Kb)
no comments
Re: Another Puppy On sci.electronics.basics Gets House Trained         


Author: Rod Speed
Date: Aug 6, 2008 00:14

Immortalist yahoo.com> wrote
> Rod Speed gmail.com> wrote
>> Immortalist yahoo.com> wrote
>>> Some science is like some creative methods in other areas of life,
>> Very little of it is in fact.
> You concession hardily accepted that at least some science involve creative methods.

Wrong again.
>>> while not all scientific discovery is creative.
>> Not much of it is in fact.
> At least you can admit you were wrong

I'm doing nothing of the sort.
> when you perceived that you were, by accepting that "some"
> is more appropriate than "all" in the stated case against you.

More of your mindless wanking.
>>> The idea is that there is a plural field of items and
>>> then method is applied and some are eliminated.
>> Thats nothing like what the fool claimed.
> But you claimed that;
>>> Darwinian random variation is nothing like how the brain works.
Show full article (5.42Kb)
no comments
Re: Another Puppy On sci.electronics.basics Gets House Trained         


Author: Don Bowey
Date: Aug 6, 2008 05:15

On 8/5/08 10:55 PM, in article
025e4fea-a7e0-49f8-ba26-5990ade21299@l33g2000pri.googlegroups.com, "Bret
Cahill" aol.com> wrote:
>>>>> Now I need a way to house train 'em by the dozen.
>
>>> This is working out better than the sabotage in _Confederacy of
>>> Dunces_.
>
>>> Bret Cahill
>
>> You seem to have a lot of fun commenting on your own posts.
>
> It ain't like you are bright enough to have a response.
>
> Care to try again?

Sure. While you're commenting to one of your own posts, do you grin and
drool while doing it?
Show full article (0.58Kb)
no comments
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9