Another Puppy On sci.electronics.basics Gets House Trained
  Home FAQ Contact Sign in
alt.philosophy only
 
Advanced search
POPULAR GROUPS

more...

alt.philosophy Profile…
 Up
Another Puppy On sci.electronics.basics Gets House Trained         


Author: Bret Cahill
Date: Aug 5, 2008 09:44

>>>>> Which project?
> All of them, since they are likely all as poorly presented as the one I
> specifically had in mind

How do you know with seeing them?

Are you suggesting that great inventors sometimes don't occasionally
have bad ideas? To the contrary, the bad ideas of most successful
inventors greatly out number the good ideas.

Edison went through 10,000 bad ideas before getting a light bulb.

Successful inventors just try so many things they can select and
choose the good ones.

You have really demonstrated you are ignorant of the design process.

And we haven't even gotten to the part where you dodge the question
about all _your_ inventions and patent numbers.

Yup, that's where this is heading. Another house training.

Apparently puppy training is in big demand around here.

Bret Cahill

"There are no bad ideas."

-- the Governator
128 Comments
Re: Another Puppy On sci.electronics.basics Gets House Trained         


Author: Rod Speed
Date: Aug 5, 2008 10:38

Just another of your pathetic little drug crazed fantasys, child.

Bret Cahill aol.com> wrote:
>>>>>> Which project?
>> All of them, since they are likely all as poorly presented as the one I specifically had in mind
> How do you know with seeing them?
> Are you suggesting that great inventors sometimes don't occasionally have bad ideas?

Nope. You are nothing even remotely resembling anything like a great inventor, child.

Just a pathetic wanker, actually.
> To the contrary, the bad ideas of most successful inventors greatly out number the good ideas.

Thats just plain wrong too.
> Edison went through 10,000 bad ideas before getting a light bulb.

You've plucked that number out of your arse too. We can tell that by the smell.
> Successful inventors just try so many things they can select and choose the good ones.

Some do, plenty dont.
> You have really demonstrated you are ignorant of the design process.

You in spades above, child.
> And we haven't even gotten to the part where you dodge
> the question about all _your_ inventions and patent numbers.

You in spades, child.
Show full article (1.51Kb)
no comments
Re: Another Puppy On sci.electronics.basics Gets House Trained         


Author: Kevin Aylward
Date: Aug 5, 2008 12:20

Rod Speed wrote:
> Just another of your pathetic little drug crazed fantasys, child.
>
> Bret Cahill aol.com> wrote:
>
>>>>>>> Which project?
>
>>> All of them, since they are likely all as poorly presented as the
>>> one I specifically had in mind
>
>> How do you know with seeing them?
>
>> Are you suggesting that great inventors sometimes don't occasionally
>> have bad ideas?
>
> Nope. You are nothing even remotely resembling anything like a great
> inventor, child.
> Just a pathetic wanker, actually.
>
>> To the contrary, the bad ideas of most successful inventors greatly ...
Show full article (2.30Kb)
no comments
Re: Another Puppy On sci.electronics.basics Gets House Trained         


Author: Rod Speed
Date: Aug 5, 2008 12:31

Kevin Aylward kevinaylward.co.uk> wrote
> Rod Speed wrote
>> Just another of your pathetic little drug crazed fantasys, child.
>> Bret Cahill aol.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>> Which project?
>>>> All of them, since they are likely all as poorly presented as the one I specifically had in mind
>>> How do you know with seeing them?
>>> Are you suggesting that great inventors sometimes don't occasionally have bad ideas?
>> Nope. You are nothing even remotely resembling anything like a great inventor, child.
>> Just a pathetic wanker, actually.
>>> To the contrary, the bad ideas of most successful inventors greatly out number the good ideas.
>> Thats just plain wrong too.
>>> Edison went through 10,000 bad ideas before getting a light bulb.
>> You've plucked that number out of your arse too. We can tell that by the smell.
>>> Successful inventors just try so many things they can select and choose the good ones.
>> Some do, plenty dont.
>>> You have really demonstrated you are ignorant of the design process.
>> You in spades above, child.
Show full article (2.74Kb)
no comments
Re: Another Puppy On sci.electronics.basics Gets House Trained         


Author: John Larkin
Date: Aug 5, 2008 12:44

>
>"There are no bad ideas."
>
>-- the Governator
>

"There are no stupid ideas, only stupid people."

-- John
no comments
Re: Another Puppy On sci.electronics.basics Gets House Trained         


Author: Bret Cahill
Date: Aug 5, 2008 15:04

It worked again.

Now I need a way to house train 'em by the dozen.

Bret Cahill
>>>>>> Which project?
>> All of them, since they are likely all as poorly presented as the one I
>> specifically had in mind
>
> How do you know with seeing them?
>
> Are you suggesting that great...
Show full article (1.01Kb)
no comments
Re: Another Puppy On sci.electronics.basics Gets House Trained         


Author: Bret Cahill
Date: Aug 5, 2008 15:07

>>"There are no bad ideas."
>
>>-- the Governator
>
> "There are no stupid ideas, only stupid people."

Especially that circular furrow denier.

Whatever happened to him?

We know he could really type "LOL."

Bret Cahill
no comments
Re: Another Puppy On sci.electronics.basics Gets House Trained         


Author: tg
Date: Aug 5, 2008 16:35

On Aug 5, 3:20 pm, "Kevin Aylward" kevinaylward.co.uk>
wrote:
> Rod Speed wrote:
>> Just another of your pathetic little drug crazed fantasys, child.
>
>> Bret Cahill aol.com> wrote:
>
>>>>>>>> Which project?
>
>>>> All of them, since they are likely all as poorly presented as the
>>>> one I specifically had in mind
>
>>> How do you know with seeing them?
>
>>> Are you suggesting that great inventors sometimes don't occasionally
>>> have bad ideas?
>
>> Nope. You are nothing even remotely resembling anything like a great
>> inventor, child.
>> Just a pathetic wanker, actually. ...
Show full article (3.14Kb)
no comments
Re: Another Puppy On sci.electronics.basics Gets House Trained         


Author: Rod Speed
Date: Aug 5, 2008 16:45

Bret Cahill aol.com> wrote
> It worked again.

Yep, you face down in the mud, as always.
> Now I need a way to house train 'em by the dozen.

Just another of your pathetic little drug crazed mud stained fantasys, child.
>>>>>>> Which project?
>>> All of them, since they are likely all as poorly presented as the
>>> one I specifically had in mind
>>
>> How do you know with seeing them?
>>
>> Are you suggesting that great...
Show full article (1.18Kb)
no comments
Re: Another Puppy On sci.electronics.basics Gets House Trained         


Author: Immortalist
Date: Aug 5, 2008 20:30

On Aug 5, 12:31 pm, "Rod Speed" gmail.com> wrote:
> Kevin Aylward kevinaylward.co.uk> wrote
>
>
>
>> Rod Speed wrote
>>> Just another of your pathetic little drug crazed fantasys, child.
>>> Bret Cahill aol.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>> Which project?
>>>>> All of them, since they are likely all as poorly presented as the one I specifically had in mind
>>>> How do you know with seeing them?
>>>> Are you suggesting that great inventors sometimes don't occasionally have bad ideas?
>>> Nope. You are nothing even remotely resembling anything like a great inventor, child.
>>> Just a pathetic wanker, actually.
>>>> To the contrary, the bad ideas of most successful inventors greatly out number the good ideas.
>>> Thats just plain wrong too.
>>>> Edison went through 10,000 bad ideas before getting a light bulb.
>>> You've plucked that number out of your arse too. We can tell that by the smell.
>>>> Successful inventors just try so many things they can select and choose the good ones.
>>> Some do, plenty dont. ...
Show full article (8.51Kb)
no comments
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9