> Rod Speed wrote
>>> I bow to your expertise on insanity, I have no personal experience.
>> Obvious lie.
> Obvious to whom?
Obvious to everyone, liar.
>>> There have always been trolls.
>> Not in usenet.
> Are you really that clueless or did you simply misread?
Never ever could bullshit and lie its way out of a wet paper bag.
>>> In fact one could argue they used to be better.
>> You wouldn't know what a real troll was if one bit you on your lard arse.
> If you're having trouble I could help by pointing out some trolls.
Never ever could bullshit and lie its way out of a wet paper bag.
>>> They seem to be generally much more immature nowadays.
>> The ancient greeks used to sit around in their togas or
>> whatever they wore and mindless rabbit on the same way.
>> Its just senility rearing its head.
> Once again I must thank you for proving the point in excellent form.
Never ever could bullshit and lie its way out of a wet paper bag.
>>> Usenet was born with the idea of newsgroups that were not
>>> unlike private living rooms where people could spend time in
>>> conversation about topics they considered interesting.
>> Thats nothing like how it was actually born.
> I didn't see you around Duke,
Because you'd wanked yourself completely blind, liar.
> where you there? Never mind your behavior speaks volumes about you understanding of usenet.
Never ever could bullshit and lie its way out of a wet paper bag.
>>> Unfortunately there are those who insist on barging in where
>>> they aren't wanted and are certainly not considered interesting.
>> And plenty of fools like you that dont have a fucking clue about anything at all too.
>>> It's the equivalent of finding the door unlocked and
>>> walking into a living room and throwing up on the carpet.
>> Nothing like it. Much closer to wandering down the pub/bar and getting involved in discussions there.
> Careful, someone might get you carded next time you show up.
Never ever could bullshit and lie its way out of a wet paper bag.
> Have you ever been in a living room with an advertised topic?
> Something like bar sci.electronics.basics?
Have you ever been in a home with an advertised topic?
Something like bar sci.electronics.basics?
> Many people meet in homes to discuss pertinent and interesting things.
Corse that never ever happens with a pub/bar, eh ?
> I would expect you to get this idea, you clearly have
> never been involved in what I'm talking about here.
Never ever could bullshit and lie its way out of a wet paper bag.
>>>> Irrelevant to what was being discussed there.
>>> You have clearly demonstrated that you haven't a clue about
>>> what was or is being discussed in sci.electronics.basics.
>> Wrong, as always.
> You seem to think that a simple proclamation from you
> actually means anything. Has anyone ever listened to you?
Never ever could bullshit and lie its way out of a wet paper bag.
>>> Trolling does not a discussion make.
>> You wouldn't know what a real troll was if one bit you on your lard arse.
> Your lack of imagination is showing again. Are your meds OK?
Wota stunningly original imagination you have there, wanker.
>>>>> I guess you can't see any groups you don't disturb
>>>>> so you will never see how well they can work.
>>>> Guess again. They do tend to get crossposted ocassionally.
>>> I clearly referred to groups you don't disturb,
>> No such animal in that sense.
> We agree then, there are no groups you don't disturb.
Never ever could bullshit and lie its way out of a wet paper bag.
>>> and by your demonstrated behavior you are clearly not capable of acting civilized.
>> Whereas your behaviour is absolutely impeccible, eh ?
>> Yeah, right.
> Am I disturbing you?
Nope. And that aint what was being discussed there anyway, you pathetic excuse for a lying bullshit artist.
>>> On your level, any group you participate in is disturbed by your inappropriate and rude behavior.
>> Corse you never ever do anything like that yourself, eh ?
>>> Any post you see was posted to a group you are disturbing.
>> Corse you never ever do anything like that yourself, eh ?
> Again I don't understand why you ask,
SURE you dont, liar.
> am I disturbing you that badly?
Nope. And that aint what was being discussed there anyway, you pathetic excuse for a lying bullshit artist.
>>> Speaking of expected behavior, I think I detect another personal attack.
>> Not a shred of evidence that you are actually capable of thought.
> From someone of your demonstrated intellect I'm not surprised you
> can't detect any functioning intellect. Maybe if you stood on a chair
> you could stop at least some things from going over your head.
Is that the best you can manage, wanker ?
>>> You are clearly not the most clever person to attempt to insult me.
>> Your mindless silly shit in spades.
> How clever.
How pathetic.
