Re: An Objective Way To Out Someone Trying To Fake A Science or Engineering Background
  Home FAQ Contact Sign in
alt.philosophy only
 
Advanced search
POPULAR GROUPS

more...

 Up
Re: An Objective Way To Out Someone Trying To Fake A Science or Engineering Background         

Group: alt.philosophy · Group Profile
Author: stan
Date: Sep 2, 2008 00:12

Rod Speed wrote:
> stan exis.net> wrote
>> Rod Speed wrote
>>> stan exis.net> wrote
>
>>>> This is the first indication I've seen that you have
>>>> any awareness of appropriate behavior on Usenet.
>
>>> You dont get to rule on what is appropriate usenet behaviour. Ever.
>
>> I must admit surprise here; maybe we're making progress.
>
> Never ever could bullshit its way out of a wet paper bag.
>
>> You seem to be fanning a flame here.
>
> Never ever could bullshit its way out of a wet paper bag.

You seem to be fascinated with feces and wet bags. Bad experience?
>> Are you acknowledging that there is appropriate and inappropriate behavior standards?
>
> Nope.
>
>> Who do you think gets to determine the standards?
>
> Certainly aint you, you're just a pathetic excuse for a bullshit artist/hypocrite.

It's really OK, you don't have to be afraid. If you don't know the
answer just say so.
>>>> Are you saying that you are aware and understand that
>>>> different newsgroups exist to discuss different topic and
>>>> that crossposting is rude and unwanted?
>
>>> That last is just your silly little drug crazed pig ignorant fantasy.
>
>> This is at best infantile nonsense.
>
> Never ever could bullshit its way out of a wet paper bag.
>
>> If you insist on ad hominem attacks
>
> You wouldnt know what a real ad hominem attack was if it bit you on your lard arse.

Did I use words that were too big? OK it means using a personal attack
to avoid or beg the question. I just reread that and some of those words
have multiple syllables so if it's still to hard just say so.
>> you might want to work on them a little. You have to do much better
>> than this when dealing with adults, if you want to be taken seriously.
>
> Never ever could bullshit its way out of a wet paper bag.
>
>>>>> Google could easily provide baseball style stats for each poster,
>
>>>>> 1. The number of OPs.
>>>>> 2. The number of OPs/response postings.
>>>>> 3. The number of responses/OP.
>>>>> 4. The average number of different posters/OP.
>>>>> 5. The above stats over time, a graph to show improvement.
>>>>> Someone suggest the above to Google.
>
>>>> We could call it the troll index.
>
>>> You wouldnt know what a real troll was if it bit you on your lard arse.
>
>> You might want to goggle for better insults, it really doesn't seem to be your strong point.
>
> But it is yours eh ?

Let's see. One of us resorts to juvenile insults. I'm sure if you really
try you can figure out which one of us that might be but you could
always ask around school if you need help.
no comments
diggit! del.icio.us! reddit!