Rod Speed wrote:
>> I bow to your expertise on insanity, I have no personal experience.
>
> Obvious lie.
Obvious to whom?
>> There have always been trolls.
>
> Not in usenet.
Are you really that clueless or did you simply misread?
>> In fact one could argue they used to be better.
>
> You wouldn't know what a real troll was if one bit you on your lard arse.
If you're having trouble I could help by pointing out some trolls.
>> They seem to be generally much more immature nowadays.
>
> The ancient greeks used to sit around in their togas or
> whatever they wore and mindless rabbit on the same way.
>
> Its just senility rearing its head.
Once again I must thank you for proving the point in excellent form.
>> Usenet was born with the idea of newsgroups that were not
>> unlike private living rooms where people could spend time in
>> conversation about topics they considered interesting.
>
> Thats nothing like how it was actually born.
I didn't see you around Duke, where you there? Never mind your behavior
speaks volumes about you understanding of usenet.
>
>> Unfortunately there are those who insist on barging in where
>> they aren't wanted and are certainly not considered interesting.
>
> And plenty of fools like you that dont have a fucking clue about anything at all too.
>
>> It's the equivalent of finding the door unlocked and
>> walking into a living room and throwing up on the carpet.
>
> Nothing like it. Much closer to wandering down the pub/bar and getting involved in discussions there.
Careful, someone might get you carded next time you show up. Have you
ever been in a bar with an advertised topic? Something like bar
sci.electronics.basics? Many people meet in homes to discuss pertinent
and interesting things. I would expect you to get this idea, you clearly
have never been involved in what I'm talking about here.
>>> Irrelevant to what was being discussed there.
>
>> You have clearly demonstrated that you haven't a clue about
>> what was or is being discussed in sci.electronics.basics.
>
> Wrong, as always.
You seem to think that a simple proclamation from you actually means
anything. Has anyone ever listened to you?
>> Trolling does not a discussion make.
>
> You wouldn't know what a real troll was if one bit you on your lard arse.
Your lack of imagination is showing again. Are your meds OK?
>>>> I guess you can't see any groups you don't disturb
>>>> so you will never see how well they can work.
>
>>> Guess again. They do tend to get crossposted ocassionally.
>
>> I clearly referred to groups you don't disturb,
>
> No such animal in that sense.
We agree then, there are no groups you don't disturb.
>> and by your demonstrated behavior you are clearly not capable of acting civilized.
>
> Whereas your behaviour is absolutely impeccible, eh ?
> Yeah, right.
Am I disturbing you?
>> On your level, any group you participate in is disturbed by your inappropriate and rude behavior.
>
> Corse you never ever do anything like that yourself, eh ?
>
>> Any post you see was posted to a group you are disturbing.
>
> Corse you never ever do anything like that yourself, eh ?
Again I don't understand why you ask, am I disturbing you that badly?
>> Speaking of expected behavior, I think I detect another personal attack.
>
> Not a shred of evidence that you are actually capable of thought.
From someone of your demonstrated intellect I'm not surprised you can't
detect any functioning intellect. Maybe if you stood on a chair
you could stop at least some things from going over your head.
>> You are clearly not the most clever person to attempt to insult me.
>
> Your mindless silly shit in spades.
How clever.
