> Rod Speed wrote
>>> Rod Speed wrote
>>>>> Trying something over and over that doesn't work is the definition of insanity.
>>>> Nope.
>>> Now here you have some credibility.
>> Unlike you.
>>> What is the correct definition?
>> There is no nice tidy definition thats anything like as simple as that.
> I bow to your expertise on insanity, I have no personal experience.
Obvious lie.
>>>>>>> Even more, anyone who is posting to a tech group but
>>>>>>> isn't really interested in technology is irrational *per se.*
>>>>>> Wrong again. Some arent interested in the tech but are interested in discussing other things
>>>>> Then why aren't they discussing those "other things" on other groups?
>>>> Because the other groups have fuck all participating in them.
>>> Could that be lack of interest?
>> Its more that usenet has always had a real tendency to collect groups of individuals
>> in particular newsgroups where the newsgroup name only quite losely describes
>> their general interests and a lot more than that does get discussed.
>> And there are always a few obsessively anal that hate that too.
> There have always been trolls.
Not in usenet.
> In fact one could argue they used to be better.
You wouldnt know what a real troll was if one bit you on your lard arse.
> They seem to be generally much more immature nowadays.
The ancient greeks used to sit around in their togas or
whatever they wore and mindless rabbit on the same way.
Its just senility rearing its head.
> Usenet was born with the idea of newsgroups that were not
> unlike private living rooms where people could spend time in
> conversation about topics they considered interesting.
Thats nothing like how it was actually born.
> Unfortunately there are those who insist on barging in where
> they aren't wanted and are certainly not considered interesting.
And plenty of fools like you that dont have a fucking clue about anything at all too.
> It's the equivalent of finding the door unlocked and
> walking into a living room and throwing up on the carpet.
Nothing like it. Much closer to wandering down the pub/bar and getting involved in discussions there.
>>>>> If there is no other group for their "issue" then why don't they start one?
>>>> Because hardly anyone will even notice that they have done that.
>>>> And hordes of very narrowly focussed groups works very badly indeed.
>>> I read several groups you aren't disturbing and they work quite well.
>> Irrelevant to what was being discussed there.
> You have clearly demonstrated that you haven't a clue about
> what was or is being discussed in sci.electronics.basics.
Wrong, as always.
> Trolling does not a discussion make.
You wouldnt know what a real troll was if one bit you on your lard arse.
>>> I guess you can't see any groups you don't disturb
>>> so you will never see how well they can work.
>> Guess again. They do tend to get crossposted ocassionally.
> I clearly refered to groups you don't disturb,
No such animal in that sense.
> and by your demonstrated behavior you are clearly not capable of acting civilized.
Whereas your behaviour is absolutely impeccible, eh ?
Yeah, right.
> On your level, any group you participate in is distrubed by your inappropriate and rude behavior.
Corse you never ever do anything like that yourself, eh ?
> Any post you see was posted to a group you are disturbing.
Corse you never ever do anything like that yourself, eh ?
> Your idea that other trolls might crosspost into groups you are disturbing isn't really interesting.
No one ever said it was, fool.
> That a troll is disturbed by someone who might dare to deflect attention isn't news, it's expected behavior.
You wouldnt know what a real troll was if one bit you on your lard arse.
>>> That's truly sad.
>> Thats truly pathetic, as always with you.
> Speaking of expected behavior, I think I detect another personal attack.
Not a shred of evidence that you are actually capable of thought.
> You are clearly not the most clever person to attempt to insult me.
Your mindless silly shit in spades.
