On Sep 1, 7:53Â am, Bret Cahill
aol.com> wrote:>>>> Google too takes up the
>>>> corporate spirit that all are almost infinitessimately small (and
>>>> don't count)
>>> Google provodes a free speech forum to the poorest of the poor.
>> Not to the day laborer in Beijing.
>
> The Chinese economy will surpass the U. S. economy in 6 years. Â The
> Chinese have already gone high tech.
What you mean to say is that high tech
has already moved its labor-intensive
operations to China (and Vietnam,
and Malaysia, and South Korea). All
to reap the rewards of cheap labor. The
real question is, when the price of that
labor escalates, does that mean labor
intensive industry will have to move to
Africa (the last bastion of cheap labor)?
> Soon all Chinese will have free speech.
Just like that, eh? A magical effect of climbing
out of the Leftard famines of yesteryear?
> In sharp contrast America will remain in GOP tax cut stagflation for
> decades according to Soros. Â
Thank Allah you have prophets such as Soros to tell you
what the future holds, eh? Otherwise, you might be lost
to Heisenbergian uncertainty, like people in the real world.
> The "free lunch on liberty" mentality has
> allowed all 4 clauses of the great charter of American freedom to come
> under fierce assult from the corp. media, politicians and other
> shills.
Not to mention from Obama, who wants to silence
American citizens who say bad things about his
pal, Ayers. Do you think Ayers is jealous of McVeigh
for his more destructive mad-bombing mission?
> The NY Times has everyone believing Pat Robertson came over on the
> Mayflower.
Well, someone was hunting witches in Salem in the
beforetime. I suppose you want everyone to think it
was a bunch of Unitarians.
> The ACLU has everyone believing free speech is only for naked nazi
> flagburner parades.
It's a good think the extreme left is so out of power in the
US, because you guys evidently believe that everyone is
stoopid enough to believe what you believe.
> Hollywood has nutters believing that if they "git pushed too far" thay
> can "pocket veto" a black candidate.
What you mean to say is that Hollywood has the moonbats
believing that people who don't misinterpret the Second
Amendment are all racists.
