> Evolution is possible because of genetic mutations.
> However it's fact that the overwhelming majority of mutations are
> harmful to
> its host.
> Most mutations lead to a disease or "distortion" of sometype that
> makes that
> individual less "fit"...if it doesn't out right kill the individual.
>
> Take, for instance, a mutation that causes a hole to form in the
> individuals heart.
> A harmful mutation obviously.
>
> Modern technology/medicine has now enabled early detection of this
> defect in a baby/fetus
> and then repair it. That individual can then live a long life and
> raise children....passing on that
> harmful mutation.
>
> Now imagine hundreds of thousands of such cases in this country. ...

> Evolution is possible because of genetic mutations.
> However it's fact that the overwhelming majority of mutations are
> harmful to
> its host.
> Most mutations lead to a disease or "distortion" of sometype that
> makes that
> individual less "fit"...if it doesn't out right kill the individual.
>
> Take, for instance, a mutation that causes a hole to form in the
> individuals heart.
> A harmful mutation obviously.
>
> Modern technology/medicine has now enabled early detection of this
> defect in a baby/fetus
> and then repair it. That individual can then live a long life and
> raise children....passing on that
> harmful mutation.
> ...

> Evolution is possible because of genetic mutations.
> However it's fact that the overwhelming majority of mutations are
> harmful to
> its host.
> Most mutations lead to a disease or "distortion" of sometype that
> makes that
> individual less "fit"...if it doesn't out right kill the individual.

>
> Take, for instance, a mutation that causes a hole to form in the
> individuals heart.
> A harmful mutation obviously.
>
> Modern technology/medicine has now enabled early detection of this
> defect...

> Which group would then be more "Darwinistic" ?
>
> Would the Amish then be more cruel ?
>
> "Yes ! Those luddite bastards!" Oh I see....so you'd have the entire
> human races
> genetic code diseased ??!!
>
> Pray tell...if this is "cruel" than how can you ever call yourself
> "Darwinist" ?
>
> Call Darwinism cruel then..call nature cruel. But then this is
> senseless, because that the way the
> world works. "Cruel" compared to what ?
>
> I've noticed that "modernist", or those of "Liberal" mind set don't
> really understand "cruelity" or compassion.
> I witnessed "Liberal societies" compassion for the AIDS virus for
> instance.
> ...

> Evolution is possible because of genetic mutations.
> However it's fact that the overwhelming majority of mutations are
>harmful to
> its host.
> Most mutations lead to a disease or "distortion" of sometype...