 Up |
|
|
  |
Author: turtoniturtoni Date: May 4, 2008 23:18
we should start a newsgroup called alt.politics
in which we discuss the decay of the romantic culture we remember from the
good ol' days.
we should form gated communities in which you don't know who the person is
five doors down but at least you know they wont try to rob or kill you
because at the very least their dna is on record.
we should clone each other and then you'd only be arguing with yourselves.
|
| |
|
| | 11 Comments |
|
|
Author: ImmortalistImmortalist Date: May 4, 2008 23:36
On May 4, 11:18 pm, "turtoni" fastmail.net> wrote:> we should start a newsgroup called alt.politics
>
> in which we discuss the decay of the romantic culture we remember from the
> good ol' days.
>
> we should form gated communities in which you don't know who the person is
> five doors down but at least you know they wont try to rob or kill you
> because at the very least their dna is on record.
>
> we should clone each other and then you'd only be arguing with yourselves.
|
| Show full article (0.87Kb) |
|
| | no comments |
|
|
Author: ImmortalistImmortalist Date: May 4, 2008 23:40
On May 4, 11:36 pm, Immortalist yahoo.com> wrote:> On May 4, 11:18 pm, "turtoni" fastmail.net> wrote:
>>> we should start a newsgroup called alt.politics
>
>> in which we discuss the decay of the romantic culture we remember from the
>> good ol' days.
>
>> we should form gated communities in which you don't know who the person is
>> five doors down but at least you know they wont try to rob or kill you
>> because at the very least their dna is on record.
>
>> we should clone each other and then you'd only be arguing with yourselves.
>
|
| |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: turtoniturtoni Date: May 4, 2008 23:50
> we should start a newsgroup called alt.politics
>
> in which we discuss the decay of the romantic culture we remember from the
> good ol' days.
>
> we should form gated communities in which you don't know who the person is
> five doors down but at least you know they wont try to rob or kill you
> because at the very least their dna is on record.
>
> we should clone each other and then you'd only be arguing with yourselves.
|
| |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: turtoniturtoni Date: May 5, 2008 00:02
> "Immortalist"
> Strange..., I tried to post that on the last topic you started bu
> google won't let anyone respond to particulare keywords, right on.
maybe you said the word nigger?
I'm a wigger.
not really.
more a tigger.
altopia is my friend.
fuck deja.
nothing is for free.
especially rolex watches.
|
| |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: brian fletcherbrian fletcher Date: May 5, 2008 07:29
"turtoni" fastmail.net> wrote in message
news:1riump.aep.17.1@news.alt.net...> we should start a newsgroup called alt.politics
>
> in which we discuss the decay of the romantic culture we remember from the
> good ol' days.
>
> we should form gated communities in which you don't know who the person is
> five doors down but at least you know they wont try to rob or kill you
> because at the very least their dna is on record.
>
> we should clone each other and then you'd only be arguing with yourselves.
Argument is actually an internal affair.
If you know something, you will recognise when somebody else does not. You
will also know that to try to convince someone else of your pov, means you
are not certain about your own.
Uncertain people share their dispositions in perfect synchronicity with
others.
BOfL
|
| |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: turtoniturtoni Date: May 5, 2008 11:06
"brian fletcher" aka god wrote:
"Uncertain people share their dispositions in perfect synchronicity with
others"
is this another gleam of knowledge you learnt at one of those investment
seminars?
|
| |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: SeanSean Date: May 5, 2008 17:22
"turtoni" fastmail.net> wrote in message
news:1rk85r.94b.19.1@news.alt.net...> "brian fletcher" aka god wrote:
>
> "Uncertain people share their dispositions in perfect synchronicity with
> others"
>
> is this another gleam of knowledge you learnt at one of those investment
> seminars?
>
seriously, don;t you understand that, or don't understand it;s importance,
or you did know that but think it's mundane or useless? ... or something
else. I'm wondering what gets you so irritated here?
|
| |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: turtoniturtoni Date: May 5, 2008 22:35
>> "brian fletcher" aka gods rolex wrote:
>>
>> "Uncertain people share their dispositions in perfect synchronicity with
>> others"
>
>>> opera winery tote:
>>> is this another gleam of knowledge you learnt at one of those investment
>>> seminars?
>>
> sean's personal timer wrote:
> seriously, don;t you understand that, or don't understand it;s importance,
> or you did know that but think it's mundane or useless? ... or something
> else. I'm wondering what gets you so irritated here?
sean i understand that uncertain people are people.
the people.
unless you're trying to disarm a man of his rolex.
then you must not let a bead of sweat rear its salty self.
|
| |
| no comments |
|
|
|
|
|
Author: ImmortalistImmortalist Date: May 5, 2008 23:28
On May 4, 11:50 pm, "turtoni" fastmail.net> wrote:>> we should start a newsgroup called alt.politics
>
>> in which we discuss the decay of the romantic culture we remember from the
>> good ol' days.
>
>> we should form gated communities in which you don't know who the person is
>> five doors down but at least you know they wont try to rob or kill you
>> because at the very least their dna is on record.
>
>> we should clone each other and then you'd only be arguing with yourselves.
|
| Show full article (0.80Kb) |
| no comments |
|
RELATED THREADS |
|
|
|
|
|
