> On 14-Aug-2008, Cormagh
yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>
>>
>>> You know, what my rational mind says about the story of Adam and Eve is
>>> that
>>> God was invented by parents as a means to stop their children from
>>> having
>>> oral sex. Â But the funny thing is that I'm just plain wrong about that.
>>> Â I
>>> keep encountering increasingly deranged women and what keeps recurring
>>> in my
>>> mind is that this woman is Eve... No, maybe this woman is Eve, she's
>>> even
>>> more deranged than the last one. Â The truth concerning the story of Adam
>>> and
>>> Eve is that its intended purpose is spell casting or witchcraft. Â I
>>> can't
>>> believe it any more than you, but it happens to be the truth. Â These
>>> women
>>> are drawn to me because the orderliness of my mind makes their brains
>>> literally feel better. Â If I cast a spell on her by saying of her that
>>> she
>>> is Eve, that drives them away. Â Calling a woman Eve obviously means she
>>> is
>>> under my protection. Â Eve is the mother of us all and to show contempt
>>> for
>>> your own mother is a curse on you. Â The creation story is structured
>>> entirely around Eve.
>
>>> --
>>> The dead do not experience feelings of bitterness.
>
>> You're onto something, except why this would apply to women (seed)
>> more than men (sperm) I don't know. Once you remove the sexual
>> preference the question becomes, why not Humanism?
>
> Why is it that I never hear of this term 'humanism' in connection with the
> person credited with coining the term? Â Could it be that 'humanism' was
> invented by... sSsSatan.
Nice try. The reason the name of the coiner, Neithammer, did not stick
with us in history is because his usage of the term was too restricted
compared to what it eventually came to mean.
http://newhumanist.org.uk/1740
By the way, there is no evidence for the existence of any god, so why
mention one in this context?
Cormagh
> --
> The dead do not experience feelings of bitterness.
