|
|
 Up |
|
|
  |
Author: Daniel T.Daniel T. Date: Nov 27, 2007 03:34
Sir Frederick fuzzysys.com> wrote:
> Since we can't pray to God, can't Trust in God and cannot post His
> Commandments in Government buildings,
> I don't believe the Government and its employees should participate
> in the Easter and Christmas celebrations which honor the God that
> our government is eliminating from many facets of American life.
Many don't.
|
| Show full article (1.32Kb) |
|
| | 13 Comments |
|
|
Author: pjmutnickpjmutnick Date: Nov 29, 2007 05:26
On Nov 27, 3:34 am, "Daniel T." earthlink.net> wrote:> Sir Frederick fuzzysys.com> wrote:>> Since we can't pray to God, can't Trust in God and cannot post His
>> Commandments in Government buildings,
From above URL:
How often have you seen something like this on the news?
Reporter: "You've just lost your house and everything you own. How do
you feel."
Victim: "I just thank the LORD everyone made it out okay, especially
my little foofoo."
Meanwhile, in the background you see the firefighter who actually
saved little foofoo being treated for his injuries, with the LORD
nowhere to be seen.
|
| Show full article (1.02Kb) |
|
| | 1 Comment |
|
|
Author: chazwinchazwin Date: Nov 29, 2007 10:49
> On Nov 27, 3:34 am, "Daniel T." earthlink.net> wrote:
>>> Sir Frederick fuzzysys.com> wrote:>>> Since we can't pray to God, can't Trust in God and cannot post His
>>> Commandments in Government buildings,
>
>
> From above URL:
>
> How often have you seen something like this on the news?
> Reporter: "You've just lost your house and everything you own. How do
> you feel."
> Victim: "I just thank the LORD everyone made it out okay, especially
> my little foofoo."
> Meanwhile, in the background you see the firefighter who actually
> saved little foofoo being treated for his injuries, with the LORD ...
|
| Show full article (1.20Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: pjmutnickpjmutnick Date: Nov 29, 2007 14:03
On Nov 29, 10:49 am, chazwin yahoo.com> wrote:
>> Fact: The LORD has been seen at various times during mankind's
>> history.
>
> So when was this, exactly?
>
>> Fact: The LORD has not been seen for a long time by mankind as a
>> whole, which has apparently been abandoned.
>
> Uh diddums!
>
>> Fact: Both sides in the debate about GOD are hopelessly lost and out
>> of touch with reality.
>
> Both of us can't be wrong!
LOL. And why not? "Concerning the Bhagavat of the Essence of Mind,
intrinsically it exists not, yet at this moment it cannot be
destroyed." -Sixth Patriarch of Zen
|
| Show full article (1.02Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: Daniel T.Daniel T. Date: Nov 29, 2007 16:05
> "Daniel T." earthlink.net> wrote:>> Sir Frederick fuzzysys.com> wrote:>>> Since we can't pray to God, can't Trust in God and cannot post His
>>> Commandments in Government buildings,
>>
>> You *can* pray to your god and trust your god, just don't do it in front
> ...
|
| Show full article (1.71Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: Daniel T.Daniel T. Date: Nov 30, 2007 04:57
> On Nov 29, 4:05 pm, "Daniel T." earthlink.net> wrote:>>> Fact: Both sides in the debate about GOD are hopelessly lost and out
>>> of touch with reality.
>>
>> Oh, if only there were just *two* sides...
>
> How is your position different from a "believer" or "disbeliever"?
> Those are the two sides, and I suspect you fall very nicely into the
> "disbeliever" category.
Believer in what?
|
| |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: pjmutnickpjmutnick Date: Nov 30, 2007 05:15
On Nov 30, 4:57 am, "Daniel T." earthlink.net> wrote:>> On Nov 29, 4:05 pm, "Daniel T." earthlink.net> wrote:>>>> Fact: Both sides in the debate about GOD are hopelessly lost and out
>>>> of touch with reality.
>
>>> Oh, if only there were just *two* sides...
>
>> How is your position different from a "believer" or "disbeliever"?
>> Those are the two sides, and I suspect you fall very nicely into the
>> "disbeliever" category.
>
> Believer in what?
God, however you wish to define it. All on this list seem to be
strongly polarized, according to the simple criterion of yea or nay.
Granted, that is an uncritical place to start, but the polarization
seems to precede us.
|
| |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: Daniel T.Daniel T. Date: Nov 30, 2007 09:37
> "Daniel T." earthlink.net> wrote:>>> On Nov 29, 4:05 pm, "Daniel T." earthlink.net> wrote:>>>>> Fact: Both sides in the debate about GOD are hopelessly
>>>>> lost and out of touch with reality.
>>>>
>>>> Oh, if only there were just *two* sides...
>>>
>>> How is your position different from a "believer" or
>>> "disbeliever"? Those are the two sides, and I suspect you fall
>>> very nicely into the "disbeliever" category.
>>
>> Believer in what?
>
> God, however you wish to define it.
However *I* wish to define it? If the object of belief is that
subjective, then surely you can see that there are far more than just
two sides...
|
| |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: chazwinchazwin Date: Dec 3, 2007 11:05
On Nov 30, 5:37 pm, "Daniel T." earthlink.net> wrote:>> "Daniel T." earthlink.net> wrote:>>>> On Nov 29, 4:05 pm, "Daniel T." earthlink.net> wrote:>>>>>> Fact: Both sides in the debate about GOD are hopelessly
>>>>>> lost and out of touch with reality.
>
>>>>> Oh, if only there were just *two* sides...
>
>>>> How is your position different from a "believer" or
>>>> "disbeliever"? Those are the two sides, and I suspect you fall
>>>> very nicely into the "disbeliever" category.
>
>>> Believer in what?
>
>> God, however you wish to define it.
>
> However *I* wish to define it? If the object of belief is that
> subjective, then surely you can see that there are far more than just ...
|
| Show full article (1.33Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
|
|
|
Author: Michael GordgeMichael Gordge Date: Dec 3, 2007 13:19
On Dec 1, 2:37 am, "Daniel T." earthlink.net> wrote:>> "Daniel T." earthlink.net> wrote:>>>> On Nov 29, 4:05 pm, "Daniel T." earthlink.net> wrote:>>>>>> Fact: Both sides in the debate about GOD are hopelessly
>>>>>> lost and out of touch with reality.
>
>>>>> Oh, if only there were just *two* sides...
>
>>>> How is your position different from a "believer" or
>>>> "disbeliever"? Those are the two sides, and I suspect you fall
>>>> very nicely into the "disbeliever" category.
>
>>> Believer in what?
>
>> God, however you wish to define it.
>
> However *I* wish to define it? If the object of belief is that
> subjective, then surely you can see that there are far more than just ...
|
| Show full article (1.26Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
|
|
