|
|
 Up |
|
|
  |
Author: BretCahillBretCahill Date: Aug 1, 2008 10:35
>>>>Three months and $100,000 in diesel to plow a field?
>>> As I recall, someone verified that the 1/2 MPH was correct in some
>>> instances.
>>In some instances some people don't need a PC.
>>You think that was a bad invention too?
> Non sequitur
Again, do you think an invention is only worthwhile if it's the only
thing everyone will ever need?
Your basic reasoning ability is screwed up so any "calculations" are a
complete farce.
Bret Cahill
"A popular government without popular information or the means of
acquiring it, is only a prologue to a farce, or a tragedy; or perhaps
both."
-- Madison (1822)
|
| |
|
| | 8 Comments |
|
|
Author: John FieldsJohn Fields Date: Aug 1, 2008 11:51
On Fri, 1 Aug 2008 10:35:05 -0700 (PDT), BretCahill@ peoplepc.com
wrote:
>>>>>Three months and $100,000 in diesel to plow a field?
>
>>>> As I recall, someone verified that the 1/2 MPH was correct in some
>>>> instances.
>
>>>In some instances some people don't need a PC.
>
>>>You think that was a bad invention too?
>
>> Non sequitur
>
>Again, do you think an invention is only worthwhile if it's the only
>thing everyone will ever need?
---
Red herring.
---
|
| Show full article (1.20Kb) |
|
| | no comments |
|
|
Author: zz Date: Aug 1, 2008 12:29
>>>>>Three months and $100,000 in diesel to plow a field?
>>>> As I recall, someone verified that the 1/2 MPH was correct in some
>>>> instances.
>>>In some instances some people don't need a PC.
who uses a PC to plow their field? seems inefficient.
|
| |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: ShrikebackShrikeback Date: Aug 2, 2008 00:13
On Aug 1, 12:29 pm, z snail-mail.net> wrote:>>>>>>Three months and $100,000 in diesel to plow a field?
>>>>> As I recall, someone verified that the 1/2 MPH was correct in some
>>>>> instances.
>>>>In some instances some people don't need a PC.
>
> who uses a PC to plow their field? seems inefficient.
You just have to learn the right programming tricks.
|
| |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: m IIm II Date: Aug 2, 2008 08:37
z wrote:
> who uses a PC to plow their field? seems inefficient.
|
| |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: Kris KriegerKris Krieger Date: Aug 2, 2008 12:55
m II wrote in news:jb%%kk.3639$nu6.3165@edtnps83:
> z wrote:
>
>> who uses a PC to plow their field? seems inefficient.
Heh ;)
What's with the traffic cone BTW - was it that "done up" that way and put
there by the sea/weather...? Strange thing, that.
|
| |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: m IIm II Date: Aug 2, 2008 17:45
Kris Krieger wrote:
> m II wrote in news:jb%%kk.3639$nu6.3165@edtnps83:
>
>> z wrote:
>>
>>> who uses a PC to plow their field? seems inefficient.
> Heh ;)
>
> What's with the traffic cone BTW - was it that "done up" that way and put
> there by the sea/weather...? Strange thing, that.
It seems to be a tribute to our stewardship of the planet.
mike
|
| Show full article (1.03Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Author: Bret CahillBret Cahill Date: Aug 3, 2008 08:14
>>>>>>Three months and $100,000 in diesel to plow a field?
>
>>>>> As I recall, someone verified that the 1/2 MPH was correct in some
>>>>> instances.
>
>>>>In some instances some people don't need a PC.
>
>>>>You think that was a bad invention too?
>
>>> Non sequitur
>
>>Again, do you think an invention is only worthwhile if it's the only
>>thing everyone will ever need?
>
> ---
> Red herring.
Do you deny that it's possible for an invention to have some uses but
not others?
|
| Show full article (0.63Kb) |
| no comments |
|
RELATED THREADS |
|
|
|
|
