|
|
 Up |
|
|
  |
Author: Roy Jose LorrRoy Jose Lorr Date: Jan 17, 2008 21:32
abracadabra wrote:
>>When I learned the pledge, there was nothing about gods in it.
>>
>>The "under god" addition was added during the anti-American McCarthy
>>pograms, and I, for one, do not choose to allow that evil to change my
>>version of that pledge.
>
>
> I don't get why we are supposed to "pledge" to a flag anyway? Seems like a
> tradition from the 17th century.
McCarthy was proven right. He's due an appology from ex
communist/present day, liberal fascists.
|
| |
|
| | 18 Comments |
|
|
Author: VirgilVirgil Date: Jan 17, 2008 21:54
In article <-OGdnUa9FMNrpA3anZ2dnUVZ_judnZ2d@ comcast.com>,
Roy Jose Lorr comcast.net> wrote:
> abracadabra wrote:
>
>>>When I learned the pledge, there was nothing about gods in it.
>>>
>>>The "under god" addition was added during the anti-American McCarthy
>>>pograms, and I, for one, do not choose to allow that evil to change my
>>>version of that pledge.
>>
>>
>> I don't get why we are supposed to "pledge" to a flag anyway? Seems like a
>> tradition from the 17th century.
>
> McCarthy was proven right. He's due an appology from ex
> communist/present day, liberal fascists.
|
| Show full article (0.92Kb) |
|
| | no comments |
|
|
Author: LuciferLucifer Date: Jan 18, 2008 04:26
On Jan 18, 5:32 am, Roy Jose Lorr comcast.net> wrote:> abracadabra wrote:
>
>>>When I learned the pledge, there was nothing about gods in it.
>
>>>The "under god" addition was added during the anti-American McCarthy
>>>pograms, and I, for one, do not choose to allow that evil to change my
>>>version of that pledge.
>
>> I don't get why we are supposed to "pledge" to a flag anyway? Seems like a
>> tradition from the 17th centur
y.
>
> McCarthy was proven right. He's due an appology from ex
> communist/present day, liberal fascists.
|
| Show full article (1.15Kb) |
| 9 Comments |
|
|
Author: Roy Jose LorrRoy Jose Lorr Date: Jan 18, 2008 06:22
Lucifer wrote:
> On Jan 18, 5:32 am, Roy Jose Lorr comcast.net> wrote:
> >>abracadabra wrote:
>>
|
| Show full article (1.01Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: LuciferLucifer Date: Jan 18, 2008 11:12
On Jan 18, 2:22 pm, Roy Jose Lorr comcast.net> wrote:> Lucifer wrote:
>> On Jan 18, 5:32 am, Roy Jose Lorr comcast.net> wrote:>
>>>abracadabra wrote:
>
>
>>>>>When I learned the pledge, there was nothing about gods in it.
>
>>>>>The "under god" addition was added during the anti-American McCarthy
>>>>>pograms, and I, for one, do not choose to allow that evil to change my
>>>>>version of that pledge.
>
>>>>I don't get why we are supposed to "pledge" to a flag anyway? Seems like a
>>>>tradition from the 17th centur
>
>> y.
> ...
|
| Show full article (1.63Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: Rev. Karl E. TaylorRev. Karl E. Taylor Date: Jan 18, 2008 11:20
Roy Jose Lorr wrote:
> Lucifer wrote:
>
>> On Jan 18, 5:32 am, Roy Jose Lorr comcast.net> wrote:
>>>>> abracadabra wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>> When I learned the pledge, there was nothing about gods in it.
>>>
>>>>> The "under god" addition was added during the anti-American McCarthy
>>>>> pograms, and I, for one, do not choose to allow that evil to change my
>>>>> version of that pledge.
>>>
>>>> I don't get why we are supposed to "pledge" to a flag anyway? Seems
>>>> like a
>>>> tradition from the 17th centur
>> ...
|
| Show full article (1.76Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: Roy Jose LorrRoy Jose Lorr Date: Jan 18, 2008 11:34
Lucifer wrote:
> On Jan 18, 2:22 pm, Roy Jose Lorr comcast.net> wrote:
> >>Lucifer wrote:
>>
>>>On Jan 18, 5:32 am, Roy Jose Lorr comcast.net> wrote:>>
>>>>abracadabra wrote:
>>
>>>>>"Virgil"
|
| Show full article (1.47Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: Roy Jose LorrRoy Jose Lorr Date: Jan 18, 2008 11:39
Rev. Karl E. Taylor wrote:
> Roy Jose Lorr wrote:
>
>> Lucifer wrote:
>>
>>> On Jan 18, 5:32 am, Roy Jose Lorr comcast.net> wrote:
>>>>>>> abracadabra wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> "Virgil" com.com> wrote in message
>>>>>...
|
| Show full article (1.63Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: Rev. Karl E. TaylorRev. Karl E. Taylor Date: Jan 18, 2008 12:18
Roy Jose Lorr wrote:
> Rev. Karl E. Taylor wrote:
>
>> Roy Jose Lorr wrote:
>>
>>> Lucifer wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Jan 18, 5:32 am, Roy Jose Lorr comcast.net> wrote:
>>>>>>>>> abracadabra wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>> When I learned the pledge, there was nothing about gods in it.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>> The "under god" addition was added during the anti-American McCarthy
>>>>>>> pograms, and I, for one, do not choose to allow that evil to ...
|
| Show full article (2.45Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
|
|
|
Author: VirgilVirgil Date: Jan 18, 2008 12:39
In article comcast.com>,
Roy Jose Lorr comcast.net> wrote:
> Lucifer wrote:
>> McCarthy pissed on the idea of America. To have free speech, and
>> freedom, that means free speech and freedom for Communists too. You
>> have to measure the freedoms of a society by the freedom it gives it's
>> dissidents, not it's mainstream.
>
> Freedom for your sworn enemies is not democracy, its insanity.
That a person was a communist, either as a party member or merely as a
sympathizer, did notof itself make him an enemy of the US. Only acts
which legally constitute treason according to US law can make an
American into an enemy of the US.
It may make him foolish, but everyone has a right to be a fool, though
Lorr rather overexercises that right.
So that Lorr's "insanity" is entirely his own.
|
| |
| no comments |
|
|
|
|
