> gmail.com> wrote in message
>
> news:7c3edb67-4541-414e-adbb-68e43bd39e69@p39g2000prm.googlegroups.com...
> On Jun 23, 9:30 pm, "Mark Earnest" yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>

>> "John Jones" aol.com> wrote in message

>

>>news:g3nuak$6oq$1@aioe.org...

>

>>>I don't like to promote untruths about pre-christian religions, so all I
>>>can say is that 666 was, and still is, a sacred number and that
>>>christianity likes to read it otherwise.

>

>>> Unfortunately, the fact and reasons why christianity condemned this
>>> sacred
>>> number are all but forgotten in our contemporary fixation with
>>> historical
>>> kitsch.

>

>> In my current continually evolving view of this, 666 is what you get when
>> you divide 2 by 3 if you look at the results on a calculator.

>

>> So to me it means man's number, where two thirds of humanity will forever
>> be
>> blessed by the one third of humanity.

>

>> That means the 2/3, or the .666 will be greater than the 1/3.
>> So you are right. 666 is not evil at all.

>
> For every religious god, there is a religious devil...reatively
> speaking of course.
>
> The bible is full of numerical symbology, but, as one would expect,
> the majority take most of such symbols as literal.
>
> Nine represents the completed human, where all the previous eight
> characteristics culminate. That level consciousness is a threat to
> churchiology power.
> Numerology is still seen as 'the devils' work by the Vatican. They
> have a 'devil' of a time hiolding on to power over more enlightened
> people.
>
> *****Yes, I believe in God rather than religion, too.
> I still hold to ancient texts about him, though.- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -