I am also posting this to an inventors n.g.

I now rationally assume that it doesn't do what is claimed, despite
this apparently phony or erroneous or doctored "news" video.

Because if it does do what is claimed, then the ^&*%%() oil price would
be in decline.

Lesson #1, the internet as per ordinary reality is a jungle

http://www.wsoctv.com/video/16531082/index.html

On Jun 14, 1:40 pm, Robert Cohen msn.com> wrote:

yeah, i've surely been punked, plinked and ponked:

Some possibly reputable sources have suggested using a little
electricity from the alternator to generate a little H2 and O2 (2H2O +
electricity => 2H2 + O2) will in fact improve the combustion of
diesel or gasoline enough so that the higher efficiency of the fuel
combustion more than pays for the energy taked from the engine by the
higher load on the alternator belt.

But it ain't gonna be an 100%% _overall_ increase in efficiency.

The first question in any efficiency improvement claim is "where was
the inefficiency in the first place?"

The hard fact of life is that most of the fuel is _already_ being
burned in a well tuned vehicle's cylinders.

GM claims they can improve fuel efficiency by 15%% with better
combustion but that engine won't be out for at least 6 years.

So the real improvement in any after market enhanced combustion
approach to improving efficiency is less than 15%%, probably much less.

The "mechanical engineer" on the videoclip was flat out lying about
the 70 mpg.

Dear Bret Cahill:

"Bret Cahill" aol.com> wrote in message
news:f863c08d-388c-4e86-9567-3c0ac934b879@w5g2000prd.googlegroups.com...
...

It is "just" a matter of having maximum pressure at mid stroke.

...

Bret Cahill aol.com> wrote in news:f863c08d-388c-4e86-9567-
3c0ac934b879@w5g2000prd.googlegroups.com:

Talk to this guy

www.mame.mu.oz.au/people/staff/cvs/HCW%%20CV%%20Webpage%%202006.pdf

He's been investigating the use of hydrogen as a combustion modifier for
decades. They call it HAJI.

By improving the combustion process they get a bigger gain than the energy
it takes to make the hydrogen in the first place. Basically they use the
hydrogen to allow an engine to run reliably when running very lean.

Cheers

Greg Locock

Maybe $100 at Walmart but we weren't talking new stuff anyway. The
fuel scam was aftermarket.

Bret Cahill

The only way to make significant improvements in efficiency of ICE is
to play with the thermo cycle itself, i. e., recuperated low pressure
ratio.

Use different machinery to compress the air and expand the gas and use
the exhaust to preheat the air after it is compressed but before it is
combusted in or before the expander.

The engine is considerably larger for the power than high compression
ratio but engine size is just not an issue in many applications, i.
e., ships. The cost of _bunker_ is the issue on ships.

On Jun 14, 9:31 pm, Bret Cahill aol.com> wrote:

Dear Bret Cahill: