On Aug 12, 1:31Â pm, George Hammond
notspam.org> wrote:> On Mon, 11 Aug 2008 19:58:36 -0700 (PDT),
>
>
>
>
>
> "bigflet...@
gmail.com"
gmail.com> wrote:>>On Aug 11, 12:33Â pm, George Hammond
notspam.org> wrote:>>>>>>[Dum]
>>>>>>The evidence is all around. Â Evidence is not the issue.
>>>>>>The issue is your disregard of it so that you can continue
>>>>>>to live your life of delusion.
>
>>>>>[Dummer]
>>>>> How about being a bit less vague. Point to a specific piece of evidence
>>>>> and explain why it is evidence for God.
>
>>>>I'd like the strongest piece of evidence available. That way, there will
>>>>be no need to hear "But wait! Â This one's better!"
>
>>> [Hammond]
>>> Â OK... I'll give you the simplest single scientific piece
>>> of evidence proving the existence of God; in 30 seconds:
>
>>How about five seconds, depending on your god given capacity to speed
>>read.
>
>>I see, I feel, I create, I destroy (within the bounds of relativity),
>>I sing, I dance I laugh and I reason, but most importantly, I am.
>
>>The rest are mere details, whatever you chose to call "it".
>
>>How many layers of vibrational frequencey, both audio and visual, does
>>one need to recognise to 'prove god'.
>>What would St Augustine have made of an ipod, or a plasma tv screen?
>
>>Answer...none, but hey, as you often tell me to do "Ill take a hike",
>>today in the Queensland rainforest, where I can blend in with the
>>miracle of life of nature.
>
>>BTW im not writing this to evoke a reaction from you, but to provide
>>another pov, so you dont need to be defensive, or its opposite,
>>agressive.
>
>>BOfL
>
> [Hammond]
> Â Â You're not mentally sovereign enough Boffle... you belong
> to the ranks of those who believe in God based on
> authority...
I believe nothing whatever with regards to this issue.Authority? You
couldnt be farther off with your judgment. It was my refusal to accept
authority from any source for decades, which opened up the doors of
self realization.I now understand that it is a prerequisit.YOu have to
have the courage of your own convictions, and I see you have that in
bucketloads.
Have you not noticed how many here with possible superior intelect do
not get what you are trying to express? Proof is absolutely
imperative, otherwise one is still in the realm of second hand
emotions, known as beliefs. We each get our proof as we need it, in
line with our unique talents and capacity. I know a musician who is so
high on the scale that he almost glows in the dark. Ironically , he
went into physics in the belief he could find his proof. It was music
that worked for him.
Copernicus may not have been the most advanced intellect of the day
(pagans were well aware of the solar system and how it functioned well
befor him), but he saw well beyond the status quo, and paid the price.
What puts a smile on my face when I occasionally read your stuff, is
how much I agree with your approach, and how that fact alone pisses
you off to the point of the need to insult, that one so lowley could
possibly understand where you are coming from.
Thats the pull of ego. Just another common obstacle, that doesnt
prevent access, but sure makes the road more bumpy than it needs to
be.
BOfL
> which is an admirable trait provided you can
> find an authority who has proof of what he's saying.
> Â Â I'm here to talk to forensic minds who believe nothing
> without hard scientific proof.
> Â Â And btw, since I am in possession of a hard scientific
> proof of God (I just posted it to begin this thread), you
> can take it from me with complete confidence that, yes,
> there is a God... despite the fact that you don't know what
> it is.
> =====================================
> Â Â Â SCIENTIFIC PROOF OF GOD WEBSITE
> Â
http://geocities.com/scientific_proof_of_god
> Â Â mirror site:
> Â
http://proof-of-god.freewebsitehosting.com
>    GOD=G_uv  (a folk song on mp3)
> Â
http://interrobang.jwgh.org/songs/hammond.mp3
> =====================================- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
