>On Aug 11, 12:33 pm, George Hammond notspam.org> wrote:

>>>>>[Dum]
>>>>>The evidence is all around.  Evidence is not the issue.
>>>>>The issue is your disregard of it so that you can continue
>>>>>to live your life of delusion.

>>

>>>>[Dummer]
>>>> How about being a bit less vague. Point to a specific piece of evidence
>>>> and explain why it is evidence for God.

>>

>>>I'd like the strongest piece of evidence available. That way, there will
>>>be no need to hear "But wait!  This one's better!"

>>
>> [Hammond]
>>   OK... I'll give you the simplest single scientific piece
>> of evidence proving the existence of God; in 30 seconds:
>>

>
>How about five seconds, depending on your god given capacity to speed
>read.
>
>I see, I feel, I create, I destroy (within the bounds of relativity),
>I sing, I dance I laugh and I reason, but most importantly, I am.
>
>The rest are mere details, whatever you chose to call "it".
>
>How many layers of vibrational frequencey, both audio and visual, does
>one need to recognise to 'prove god'.
>What would St Augustine have made of an ipod, or a plasma tv screen?
>
>Answer...none, but hey, as you often tell me to do "Ill take a hike",
>today in the Queensland rainforest, where I can blend in with the
>miracle of life of nature.
>
>BTW im not writing this to evoke a reaction from you, but to provide
>another pov, so you dont need to be defensive, or its opposite,
>agressive.
>
>BOfL
>
>