On Aug 11, 12:33Â pm, George Hammond
notspam.org> wrote:>>>>[Dum]
>>>>The evidence is all around. Â Evidence is not the issue.
>>>>The issue is your disregard of it so that you can continue
>>>>to live your life of delusion.
>
>>>[Dummer]
>>> How about being a bit less vague. Point to a specific piece of evidence
>>> and explain why it is evidence for God.
>
>>I'd like the strongest piece of evidence available. That way, there will
>>be no need to hear "But wait! Â This one's better!"
>
> [Hammond]
> Â OK... I'll give you the simplest single scientific piece
> of evidence proving the existence of God; in 30 seconds:
>
How about five seconds, depending on your god given capacity to speed
read.
I see, I feel, I create, I destroy (within the bounds of relativity),
I sing, I dance I laugh and I reason, but most importantly, I am.
The rest are mere details, whatever you chose to call "it".
How many layers of vibrational frequencey, both audio and visual, does
one need to recognise to 'prove god'.
What would St Augustine have made of an ipod, or a plasma tv screen?
Answer...none, but hey, as you often tell me to do "Ill take a hike",
today in the Queensland rainforest, where I can blend in with the
miracle of life of nature.
BTW im not writing this to evoke a reaction from you, but to provide
another pov, so you dont need to be defensive, or its opposite,
agressive.
BOfL
