Date: Wed, Dec 24 2008 1:30 pm
From: Doctroid

Date: Wed, Dec 24 2008 1:30 pm
From: Doctroid

In article
<28d7ec08-213d-4c05-92ff-148f7e6a8cd4@a29g2000pra.googlegroups.com>,
mrdilligent aol.com> wrote:

...

< nevertheless you're willing to insist on your view of God's
attributes.
Interesting.>>

Well, now, here we have at last an intelligent poster!
You are right, of course; without a definition of _God_, or a
description of the "real object" we mean by that word, it is
impossible to get a handle...

On Dec 24, 11:49 pm, George Hammond notspam.com> wrote:

ten tips to lower credit card costs

http://br-articles.blogspot.com/2008/10/7-ways-to-avoid-credit-card-overload.htm...
ten tips to lower credit card costs

anti spam & free ware
Every one of us knows how spam impacts us. Every day we either get a
ton of spam - or if we're fairly well protected by spam filters - only
a few pieces.anti spam & free ware
http://br-articles.blogspot.com/2008/11/anti-spam-at-enterprise-level.html
anti spam & free ware

couple de lesbienne cherche sex occasionnelle femme seulement
http://canada-lesbi.blogbugs.org/

Lesbi cuple want sex right now http://lesbicouple.pornblink.com/

On Dec 22, 10:07�am, George Hammond notspam.com> wrote

Since you obviously want us to believe you are a member of the
institution we call "science," and thus have the educational basis for
that, then how come you rely so much on ad hominems?

On Dec 22, 10:07?am, George Hammond notspam.com> wrote

I woulld agree, if one could define what the word _God_ means.

Are you aware that "words" do not exist as emprical entities? Man
made every one of them up. They are figments of man's imagination,
nothing more, everyone of them. (What they each represent, however,
may in fact exist.) _God_ is such a "word." And no, I do not
subscribe to the "conventional useage" notion that prevails today.

The phenomenA of God may be visual (or otherwise sensorily
detectable). The phenomenON of God is in no way directly attained
through the senses. It must be INFERRED from a google of sensation
and inferenced from them. In other words, one must have EXPERIENCED a
huge amount accumulated from living, and must have INFERRED a huge
amount from what he has experienced, and he must have THOUGHT deeply
about everything he experienced and inferred. You don't find God by
reading---anything. (But reading other people's opinions can offer
clues to THINKING.)

On Dec 22, 10:07?am, George Hammond notspam.com> wrote

< WORLD IS ACTUALLY INVISIBLE TO YOU

< you quoted comes in about the "pure in spirit will see God".
Simple Science tells us that people woh don't smoke, don't
drink, don't "sin" in general will have better growth and
therefore will see MORE OF REALITY.... in fact do gooders
may undergo a lifting of repression unleashing LARGE amounts
of pent up and latent "brain growth" allowing tohem to
"miraculously" see more of reality. This phenomena is known
in theology as "SEEING GOD".>>

What, exactly, do you mean by "science"? The INSTITUTION that goes by
that name, or the actual science---knowledge of what IS? The
INSTITUTION these days is putting out a barrage of garbage as if it
were bonafide knowledge of what IS.