|
|
Up |
|
|
  |
Author: Jose GasparJose Gaspar Date: Mar 10, 2008 21:08
Deborah Lynch's name was Deborah G. Boyd. Deb-The-Crook moved from California
to Florida where she got caught taking escrow money for her personal use. That
was the high point in her life... then she met John Gilmer and everything went
to downhill...
Deborah Lynch = Deborah G. Boyd
|
| |
|
| | 22 Comments |
|
  |
Author: LumpyLumpy Date: Mar 10, 2008 21:49
On Mar 10, 9:08 pm, Jose Gaspar newsguy.com> wrote:
> Deborah Lynch's name was Deborah G. Boyd. Deb-The-Crook moved from California
> to Florida where she got caught taking escrow money for her personal use.
I think there's another word for that.
heh.
|
| |
|
| | no comments |
|
  |
Author: Beavershot AndersonBeavershot Anderson Date: Mar 11, 2008 04:21
On Mar 11, 12:49 am, Lumpy gmail.com> wrote:
> I think there's another word for that.
>
> heh.
Sure is. It's called bullshit, plain and simple.
If any of this actually ever comes to litigation it won't be any of
the usual suspects suing over he said this/she said that, it will be
Deb suing someone who posts totally made up crap like this.
And you cannot defend against the statements that you are making
because they are absolutely, positively false.
And you are making malicious statements about someone who has never
harmed you nor even been around the newsgroups to defend themselves.
Oh yeah. She took Karen's man away from Karen. That's what it boils
down to.
|
| |
| no comments |
|
  |
Author: LumpyLumpy Date: Mar 11, 2008 09:38
On Mar 11, 4:21 am, Beavershot Anderson hushmail.com>
wrote:
>
> And you are making malicious statements about someone who has never
> harmed you nor even been around the newsgroups to defend themselves.
Number 1., I'm not Karen Anderson. I am El Lumpo, he of the Ben and
Jerry's addiction.
Number 2., if it comes from the public record, it's not bullshit.
Number 3., you are the one who started this blood feud and you have no
one to blame but yourself for bringing your meal-ticket into it. Only
a swine on the level of Ken would do something like that. That, boy,
would be you.
Number 4.; you are the one who came out of nowhere and started calling
me Karen Anderson because I live on the Kitsap Peninsula along with a
million others who have Comcast as their internet provider. Since
Karen Anderson hails from Bremerton, then I find it a hilariously
serendipitous experience to watch the gyrations of a couple of usenet
kooks who actually believe I'm their object.
|
| Show full article (1.37Kb) |
| no comments |
|
  |
Author: Beavershot AndersonBeavershot Anderson Date: Mar 11, 2008 09:45
On Mar 11, 12:38 pm, Lumpy gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Number 2., if it comes from the public record, it's not bullshit.
>
That's part of the problem asshole. It's not coming from the public
record. You are either lying or too fucking stupid to understand what
you are reading.
I really wish that you were someone with some funds "Lumpy" because
your ISP will give you up in a heartbeat when they get served.
And you have zero defenses for posting inaccurate bullshit intended to
harm a completely innocent third party. You even made a statement a
few days ago that you were looking forward to harming her career, and
that's the sort of thing awards come from.
Once again, you are too stupid to understand that. Stupid like a
bitter, vengeful waitress with nothing to lose because she lives in a
dump already.
|
| |
| no comments |
|
  |
Author: LumpyLumpy Date: Mar 11, 2008 10:04
On Mar 11, 9:45 am, Beavershot Anderson hushmail.com>
wrote:
> On Mar 11, 12:38 pm, Lumpy gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>> Number 2., if it comes from the public record, it's not bullshit.
>
> That's part of the problem asshole. It's not coming from the public
> record. You are either lying or too fucking stupid to understand what
> you are reading.
>
> I really wish that you were someone with some funds "Lumpy" because
> your ISP will give you up in a heartbeat when they get served.
>
> And you have zero defenses for posting inaccurate bullshit intended to
> harm a completely innocent third party. You even made a statement a
> few days ago that you were looking forward to harming her career, and
> that's the sort of thing awards come from.
> ...
|
| Show full article (2.50Kb) |
| no comments |
|
  |
Author: Beavershot AndersonBeavershot Anderson Date: Mar 11, 2008 10:35
On Mar 11, 1:04 pm, Lumpy gmail.com> wrote:
> It's
> going to completely ruin your tomorrows
You don't know what the fuck you are talking about.
If she sues you, and that is looking like an increasingly viable
option, then you will have zero defenses. You said that she was a
criminal - which she's not. You held a completely innocent woman up
to scorn. You made accusations that were completely false. You
stated that you wanted to harm her career. The list goes on and on
and as you said, there is quite a record of what you wrote.
What you can Google from someone else's statements isn't going to be
much of a defense, especially when you are wrong. Your pal Anderson
gave you false information and you fell for it hook line and sinker.
If you are indeed who you say you are then you are likely the only one
of the Anderson/Cmelak dweebs who has any property. Congrats. It
will go to paying attorneys fees. Or damages.
My suggestion to YOU is multiple:
|
| Show full article (1.50Kb) |
| no comments |
|
  |
Author: Jose GasparJose Gaspar Date: Mar 11, 2008 11:19
>
>On Mar 11, 1:04=A0pm, Lumpy gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>> It's
>> going to completely ruin your tomorrows
>
>
>You don't know what the fuck you are talking about.
I'm think he does... hmmmm... yup... I'm certain he does...
>My suggestion to YOU is multiple:
>
>-- apologize to Deborah. Repeatedly. Online. It's a minor thing,
>but it's that Google thing too.
>-- then get the fuck offline and stop harrassing people like Sarah and
>Ken who are frankly better people than you are.
|
| Show full article (1.38Kb) |
| no comments |
|
  |
Author: LumpyLumpy Date: Mar 11, 2008 11:37
On Mar 11, 10:35 am, Beavershot Anderson
hushmail.com> wrote:
> If she sues you, and that is looking like an increasingly viable
> option, then you will have zero defenses. You said that she was a
> criminal - which she's not.
No, I didn't.
> You
> stated that you wanted to harm her career.
No, I didn't.
> What you can Google from someone else's statements isn't going to be
> much of a defense, especially when you are wrong. Your pal Anderson
> gave you false information and you fell for it hook line and sinker.
I am not responsible for what other people write on a flame group, an
avowed flame group, a flame group that you have been participating in
for decades, and if there is anyone who has damaged someone, it's
you. The website that you maintain against Karen Anderson will be
entered into discovery and you will be cross-examined for hours, days,
and weeks. The judge will throw the case out of court and you may be
arrested for criminal mischief in the first degree, which is a felony.
|
| Show full article (1.56Kb) |
| no comments |
|
  |
|
|
  |
Author: Beavershot AndersonBeavershot Anderson Date: Mar 11, 2008 11:48
On Mar 11, 2:19 pm, Jose Gaspar newsguy.com> wrote:
>
that she got
> fired from SellState Realty and Rincon Realty.
She didn't.
That's enough dude. We've made up our minds. We'll see you in court
and you can babble on then.
|
| |
| no comments |
|
|
|
|