In article bgtnsc05-news.ops.worldnet.att.net>, Karen
says...
>
>"Jose Gaspar"
newsguy.com> wrote in message
>news:g9c8a10iim@drn.newsguy.com
>>>
>>> "Jose Gaspar"
newsguy.com> wrote in message
>>> news:g8t5co0m5m@drn.newsguy.com
>>>>>
>>>>> On Aug 24, 7:24=A0pm, Jose Gaspar newsguy.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> =A0
>>>>>>
>>>>>> It wouldn't have mattered if you would have met me at The Celt
>>>>>> where Sara=
>>>>> h said
>>>>>> you had agreed to meet with me... =A0I killfiled that lying bitch!
>>>>>
>>>>> You know where I live. We literally have a priest on the premises.
>>>>> Should I alert him to your possible need for last rites?
>>>>>
>>>>> Seriously, #1, obvious threats should assure you of a place in the
>>>>> Kook Hall of Fame, Karen, and #2 if you were afraid to face me in
>>>>> Orlando then I just don't see you fucking with me IRL at my home.
>>>>
>>>> You're a fool, John, but you're easy... I'll deal with you my
>>>> way... when all this has cooled down...
>>>
>>> I have a question....about the rifle the snipers used in the Maryland
>>> string of shootings....besides having a good site, did it have a
>>> silencer on it? Just askin' ...
>>
>> They weren't snipers in the sense that they were trained to shoot long
>> distances.
>
>Just the way they chose and picked off people at random while out of
>sight themselves. The victim of a "sniper" like that truly doesn't know
>what hit them. But they're dead....
>
>> Just two losers like Ken and John... A silencer is a
>> waste of time because the sound of one round being fired does not
>> draw a lot of attention anyway. At a half mile away, the sound
>> created by the expanding gasses would not be all that noticeable at
>> the target sight. If the bullet travels at supersonic speed it will
>> give off a high pitched 'crack' regardless of any silencer, so
>> silencers are most effective on subsonic bullets.
>
>People who heard that "crack" from Lee Harvey Oswald's rifle thought it
>was something backfiring or a fire cracker. Meanwhile, Kennedy was
>dead.
Oswald was very close (less than 100 yards) and up high. The 6.5mm that he had
cracked pretty loud and there was nothing to muffle the sound, plus he shot 3
times - plenty enough to draw attention...
>> I know John Gilmer can't shoot worth a shit because he said he owned
>> an AR-15 and he said they were not accurate rifles.
>
>Nor is his pistol since he shot at someone and MISSED him. LMAO at the
>hopeless FU!!
He's a riot, isn't he?