Sarah Czepiel
cox.net> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> On 2 Aug 2008 05:50:51 -0700, Jose Gaspar
>>>>>>>>>>
newsguy.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In article <66g69452e0et4ucrc7eqs0anig8ms37b85@
4ax.com>,
>>>>>>>>>>>> Sarah Czepiel says...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 31 Jul 2008 21:01:57 -0700, "Sturmtruppen"
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
cocks.net> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Oh yes it is. Karen Anderson and Lumpy are one in the
>>>>>>>>>>>>> same.
PROVE IT.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Where's your picture?
In my computer, in my home, in my friends' computers and homes, in my
family's computers and homes, in newspapers, in yearbooks, in group
photos, on the internet. Where's YOUR picture? The current one you are
afraid to have taken or post.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> And where is a picture of you and Ken TOGETHER with
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> his familiar yard scenes in the background? Or maybe
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the two of you in front of one of the hot cars. Use
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the tripod if you don't have a friend or relative to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> take the photo.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Where is your picture?
See above (you do have a tendency to repeat yourself, like a broken
record)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The only "k00k" who photoshops pictures (and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> documents)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is YOU and KEN.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Prove it.
You've proved it yourself. Several "goodies" in your online album.
Pictures of "Karen Anderson" that are not her.
Until you do all my comments are no more than
>>>>>>>>>>>>> wild eyed accusations and the ravings of a spittle
>>>>>>>>>>>>> spewing lunatic. :)
For once, I agree with you. Nice revelation, "Sarah".
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> We will believe something that is authentic.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> And who are you?
Don't you know who "sturmtruppen" is? Check Google Archives. LOL...
>>>>>>>>>>>> Is there anything that you DO know, you stupid twit!
>>>>>> You see why NO ONE believes you, Shut-in Sarah?
>>>>
>>>> "If you are Sarah Czepiel, I will leave you alone forever. The
>>>> only reason I'm here is because of Gilmer. "
>>>>
>>>>>> YOU were the one who invited me to continue to post to ANTU.
>>>>
>>>> I took you at your word: " The only reason I'm here is because
>>>> of Gilmer. " meaning your fight is with Gilmer. Obviously a lie.
He changed his mind? Decided to kick your ass, too? You told him he
didn't have to leave. You and Ken were all enamoured with his military
service....until you *changed your minds*. Jose is here because of
Gilmer and since Gilmer was here because of you, then you are judged by
the company you keep. You are at least as insane as he is so why not
finish you off, too.... rotfl...
>>> When I came back from Europe I only wanted to discuss my trip
>>> with you.
>
> " Sleeping with the Enemy".
Why is Princess YOUR enemy? Now you're after Jose, too? Maybe you
shouldn't have kicked Gilmer to the curb recently. LMAO He might
consider you with all the money you claim to have.
>>> You are the one who went fucking berserk. Go back and look it
>>> up, retard!
>
> Lumpy went berserk. Look it up yourself.
Nobody can possibly verify the LIES you tell. That's your job to
find/make up something to back up lies. Lumpy doesn't "go berserk"; he
just laughs his ass off when he sees you getting yours kicked.
Pity NO ONE believes you, eh Sarah.
>>>
>>> Your only ally just
>>> bailed out on you...
>
> Ally? This group of online personas you've created really is your
> entire life.
None of us were EVER your ally, witch. Your lone "friend" is froggy
Larry who will embarrass himself to try to support you....while you just
threw him under the bus. LOL ...
Jose...you might have set a record today for satisfying a woman.
Sarah's masochistic needs were more than met today ... every time you
posted and she replied. It's been disgusting to watch. Even more
disgusting is to think that pukey-faced Ken is the one you were
"stroking". Ken/Sarah have really gotten off today....now if only he
had that new knock-off watch on his wrist while he was knocking-off
(if'n you get my drift;)
While Sarah continually defends Ken, he never comes to her defense.
Notice that?
These two are absolutely the dullest and dimmest-wits on Usenet. I've
"fed" Sarah/Ken enough today. She lies faster than anyone can throw
them back in her face...all part of her need for
"satisfaction"....getting others to keep bantering with her while she
gets her kicks. She and Ken are two of the disabled who have "special"
needs and will resort to most anything to get off. Truly PATHETIC.
Sarah doesn't have THREE sons. She just wants people to believe that to
show she actually had real sex THREE times in her miserable life. If
there really were three, they'd be listed along with Mikey. Sometimes a
mother will deny she has a child or two; Sarah does it ass-backwards.
She lies about children she never had. Like Ken lies about a wife he
never had. Like they lie about 99%% of everything they post. What a
WASTE OF TIME these two are. She offers absolutely NO logic and doesn't
recognize logic when other people present it.
They are both a disgrace to the disabled...
Sarah? Get Fucked ...
