|
|
 Up |
|
|
  |
| Re: sara cesspool Still Can't Tell The Truth about how fatfuck kennboy leaked out of her rank, diseased CUNT and why she kept the afterbirth after it ate the stillborn deformed fetus |
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
Group: alt.nuke.the.usa · Group Profile
Author: ZapRatzZapRatz Date: Aug 31, 2008 18:32
On Thu, 28 Aug 2008 18:11:43 -0400, Sarah Czepiel cox.net>
wrote:
>From: Sarah Czepiel cox.net>
>Newsgroups: alt.nuke.the.usa,alt.obituaries,alt.usenet.kooks
>Subject: Re: Karen Anderson's snatch, was re Re: Karen Anderson, serial stalker, you creep me out, was Re:
>Message-ID: <4j8eb45pbhi4nn6pn0fjqdafbnki7b11bk@4ax.com>
>References: dizum.com> f63g2000hsf.googlegroups.com> <32bc4cd8-8150-4b03-818f-a1b2f32572c1@l64g2000hse.googlegroups.com> drn.newsguy.com> <7dd80543-d35a-44d1-a2a1-fec17863b103@l42g2000hsc.googlegroups.com> n38g2000prl.googlegroups.com>
>Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2008 18:11:43 -0400
>
>On Thu, 28 Aug 2008 14:52:46 -0700 (PDT), "DEAD GILMER aka Cmelak with an
>ASS fetish." yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>:>On Aug 28, 12:25 pm, AssPyrateJohn gmail.com> wrote:
>:>Look in the mirror, you'll see it again.
>
>Bend over Silly Billy. You're being boned. ;)
Could it be that I had nothing to do with the message for which you
posted your follow-up containing illogical misidentification?
The headers of the message to which you are referring to see that it
has no connection whatsoever with a domain in Wisconsin. Which, of
course, would be necessary if there were any chance that someone
residing in Wisconsin had posted the message.
Oh, and by the way, notice the number of newsgroups that the message
in question was simultaneously CROSS-POSTED into?
Buy a clue regarding that investigative tidbit.
sara cesspool, the malicious skank CUNT, gets it wrong AGAIN!
-------------------------
From: "DEAD GILMER." yahoo.com>
Newsgroups: alt.nuke.the.usa,alt.obituaries,alt.usenet.kooks
Subject: Re: Karen Anderson's snatch, was re Re: Karen Anderson,
serial stalker, you creep me out, was Re:
Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2008 14:52:46 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID:
n38g2000prl.googlegroups.com>
References: dizum.com>
f63g2000hsf.googlegroups.com>
<32bc4cd8-8150-4b03-818f-a1b2f32572c1@l64g2000hse.googlegroups.com>
drn.newsguy.com>
<7dd80543-d35a-44d1-a2a1-fec17863b103@l42g2000hsc.googlegroups.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 71.38.111.54
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1219960366 1186 127.0.0.1 (28 Aug 2008
21:52:46 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: n38g2000prl.googlegroups.com;
posting-host=71.38.111.54;
posting-account=Xe6DEQoAAABnPZRU9fS4N7XlMMI1cZxA
==========================
71.38.111.54 = [ 71-38-111-54.phnx.qwest.net ]
(Asked whois.arin.net:43 about +71.38.111.54)
OrgName: Qwest Communications Corporation
OrgID: QCC-22
Address: 1801 California Street
City: Denver
StateProv: CO
PostalCode: 80202
Country: US
NetRange: 71.32.0.0 - 71.39.255.255
CIDR: 71.32.0.0/13
NetName: QWEST-INET-119
NetHandle: NET-71-32-0-0-1
Parent: NET-71-0-0-0-0
NetType: Direct Allocation
NameServer: AUTHNS1.MPLS.QWEST.NET
NameServer: AUTHNS2.DNVR.QWEST.NET
NameServer: AUTHNS3.STTL.QWEST.NET
Comment:
RegDate: 2004-12-17
Updated: 2006-02-09
RAbuseHandle: QIA2-ARIN
RAbuseName: Qwest Abuse
RAbusePhone: 1-877-886-6515
RAbuseEmail: abuse@qwest.net
RNOCHandle: QIN-ARIN
RNOCName: Qwest IP NOC
RNOCPhone: 1-877-886-6515
RNOCEmail: support@qwestip.net
RTechHandle: QIA-ARIN
RTechName: Qwest IP Admin
RTechPhone: 1-877-886-6515
RTechEmail: ipadmin@qwest.com
OrgAbuseHandle: QIA2-ARIN
OrgAbuseName: Qwest Abuse
OrgAbusePhone: 1-877-886-6515
OrgAbuseEmail: abuse@qwest.net
OrgNOCHandle: QIN-ARIN
OrgNOCName: Qwest IP NOC
OrgNOCPhone: 1-877-886-6515
OrgNOCEmail: support@qwestip.net
OrgTechHandle: QIA-ARIN
OrgTechName: Qwest IP Admin
OrgTechPhone: 1-877-886-6515
OrgTechEmail: ipadmin@qwest.com
ARIN WHOIS database last updated 2008-08-30 19: 10
On Tue, 12 Aug 2008 10:40:42 -0400, Sarah Czepiel cox.net>
wrote:
>On 12 Aug 2008 06:03:46 -0700, Jose Gaspar newsguy.com> wrote:
>
>:>In article <2371a4lb8l6brlt2tdcdm8l07l85h2gv5q@4ax.com>, Sarah Czepiel says...
>
>:>Considering all the nasty, filthy garbage that Ken has said about Karen, do you
>:>honestly think anyone is going to reveal their real name?
>
>Nasty, filthy garbage? You and Lumpy are threatening people with physical
>violence. It might be smart thing to keep your identity a secret
>considering the actionable threats you've uttered.
>
>:>__________________________________________________________
>:>
>:>
>:>
>:>>:>and pictures on the ship, etc.
>:>>
>:>>Cite.
>:>
>:>
>:>__________________________________________________________
>:>
>:>Path:
>:>g2news1.google.com!news4.google.com!newshub.sdsu.edu!newsfeed.news2me.com!sn-xit-04!sn-xit-12!sn-xit-09!sn-post-01!supernews.com!corp.supernews.com!not-for-mail
>:>From: Sarah Czepiel cox.net>
>:>Newsgroups: alt.obituaries
>:>Subject: Re: For Sara
>:>Date: Sat, 27 Aug 2005 12:30:18 -0400
>:>Organization: God Bless The USA!
>:>Message-ID: 4ax.com>
>:>References: drn.newsguy.com>
>:>X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 2.0/32.652
>:>MIME-Version: 1.0
>:>Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
>:>Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
>:>X-Complaints-To: abuse@supernews.com
>:>Lines: 14
>:>
>:>I've seen the image before Anonymous Jose because a family member of
>:>mine is standing in the foreground. The image was taken aboard USS
>:>Enterprise just off the California coast as she was heading off on her
>:>1978 WESTPAC cruise.
>:>
>:>Wanna see the cruise patch? :)
>:>_____________________________________________________
>
>I'd forgotten that image. The Enterprise 1978 WESTPAC cruise. I thought
>you meant the Churchill.
>
>:>>I can verify what PJ says
>:>
>:>BWHAhahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha...
>:>
>:>Let's see the verification...
>:>
>:>Can you verify that Karen did anything more than attempt to have a prearranged
>:>date with Gilmer?
>
>Cmelak lied when he said it was mistake for Karen to send those photo's to
>John? Or the longwinded nym who last night wrote that Karen had sent John
>some pictures ?
>
>:>Can you verify that Karen was ever in FL since the aborted date?
>
>I can't even resolve that you're in Florida NOW. You claim to live in an
>area where you can watch Space Shuttle launches yet you had no idea that
>there have been 30 night launches of the Shuttle. Night launches of the
>shuttle is fairly common knowledge and I remember hearing about them way in
>advance even while I was living up north. For someone supposedly living in
>Fla. to have no knowledge that there have been THIRTY such launches is,
>frankly, a little hard to swallow.
>
>But to answer your question, I don't recall ever seriously thinking that
>she was in Fla. no, at least not living there long term.
>
>:>You see, considering all the fucking lies that Gilmer has said about me, I can
>:>only assume that he is lying about Karen.
>
>He isn't lying about the pictures.
> The pictures are on the website.
>
>He isn't lying about the stalking.
> He's got those pictures too, also on the website.
>
>He filed a police report on Karen's stalking activities.
> The police report is scanned and on the website.
> Read the report.
>
>The name of the two officers is on the report.
>
>If you think that's all lies, pick up the phone and call the two officers
>who responded to the complaint.
>
>
>I believe pictures. I believe Police Reports. I believe Police Officers.
>
>
>
>:>He takes the truth and smashes it all to hell and picks up a few shards and reassembles
>:>it into an almost total fantasy.
>
>Oh like , "Sarah isn't married to Ken" and " The divorce papers are
>forged", or, " Sarah is disabled and on living on disability benefits" ?
>The fantasies you all have been repeating as truth? THOSE fantasies?
>
>:> I know that for a fact. I also know that he's a wife beater. Do a
>:>background check on him. It's all there in the public records.
>
>Do a background check? Sounds like you already did one. So pass it
>along. Whatcha got.
>
>:>>You hide behind a series of anonymous nyms.
>:>
>:>I mostly post as Jose Gaspar. A few times I mocked Gilmer's name or yours but
>:>those were always obvious and I never tried to hide that fact.
>
>Can you explain how your posting styles change so dramatically? It
>certainly looks like you share the Jose Gaspar nym, and until proven
>otherwise that is what I believe. Based on the posting styles I believe
>you share the nym with at least one and perhaps two other people.
>
>
> I do NOT use a
>:>series of anonymous nyms. You just can't believe that several people are
>:>kicking your ass...
>
>I don't have ONE person kicking my ass let alone several. You dumbasses
>are the most whacked out dysfunctional lot I've ever see.. ;)
>
>:>>:>>Go away. If you leave this ends. If you stay it continues.
>:>>:>
>:>>:>And sun will rise tomorrow and the sun will set tomorrow... Go fuck yourself,
>:>>:>you goddamn liar!
>:>>
>:>>Anonymous cowardly nym versus someone I have talked to on the phone.
>:>
>:>If you believe that talking to someone on the phone makes them credible, then
>:>you are even more of a fool than everyone believes you are.
>
>I believe someone who I can talk with.
>I believe photographic evidence.
>I believe Police Reports.
>I believe Police Officers.
>
>I DON'T believe cowardly anonymous blowhards, especially those who issue
>idle threats.
>
>
>I await a response to my agreement to give Karen a call. How refreshing
>it would be to find out she's more stable and has more sense than the rest
>of you combined. --
As of the day this message is being posted there are,
lacking an unexpected alternate outcome, 141 days
remaining in the imperial presidency of George W. Bus
--
As of the day this message is being posted there are,
lacking an unexpected alternate outcome, 141 days
remaining in the imperial presidency of George W. Bush
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
