|
|
 Up |
|
|
  |
| Re: saara cesspool Still Can't Tell The Time because of the rancid heat waves emitted from her diseased smelly CUNT |
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
Group: alt.nuke.the.usa · Group Profile
Author: ZapRatzZapRatz Date: Aug 31, 2008 18:28
On Thu, 28 Aug 2008 18:11:43 -0400, Sarah Czepiel cox.net>
wrote:
>From: Sarah Czepiel cox.net>
>Newsgroups: alt.nuke.the.usa,alt.obituaries,alt.usenet.kooks
>Subject: Re: Karen Anderson's snatch, was re Re: Karen Anderson, serial stalker, you creep me out, was Re:
>Message-ID: <4j8eb45pbhi4nn6pn0fjqdafbnki7b11bk@4ax.com>
>References: dizum.com> f63g2000hsf.googlegroups.com> <32bc4cd8-8150-4b03-818f-a1b2f32572c1@l64g2000hse.googlegroups.com> drn.newsguy.com> <7dd80543-d35a-44d1-a2a1-fec17863b103@l42g2000hsc.googlegroups.com> n38g2000prl.googlegroups.com>
>Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2008 18:11:43 -0400
>
>On Thu, 28 Aug 2008 14:52:46 -0700 (PDT), "DEAD GILMER aka Cmelak with an
>ASS fetish." yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>:>On Aug 28, 12:25 pm, AssPyrateJohn gmail.com> wrote:
>:>Look in the mirror, you'll see it again.
>
>Bend over Silly Billy. You're being boned. ;)
Could it be that I had nothing to do with the message for which you
posted your follow-up containing illogical misidentification?
The headers of the message to which you are referring to see that it
has no connection whatsoever with a domain in Wisconsin. Which, of
course, would be necessary if there were any chance that someone
residing in Wisconsin had posted the message.
Oh, and by the way, notice the number of newsgroups that the message
in question was simultaneously CROSS-POSTED into?
Buy a clue regarding that investigative tidbit.
sara cesspool, the malicious skank CUNT, gets it wrong AGAIN!
-------------------------
From: "DEAD GILMER." yahoo.com>
Newsgroups: alt.nuke.the.usa,alt.obituaries,alt.usenet.kooks
Subject: Re: Karen Anderson's snatch, was re Re: Karen Anderson,
serial stalker, you creep me out, was Re:
Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2008 14:52:46 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID:
n38g2000prl.googlegroups.com>
References: dizum.com>
f63g2000hsf.googlegroups.com>
<32bc4cd8-8150-4b03-818f-a1b2f32572c1@l64g2000hse.googlegroups.com>
drn.newsguy.com>
<7dd80543-d35a-44d1-a2a1-fec17863b103@l42g2000hsc.googlegroups.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 71.38.111.54
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1219960366 1186 127.0.0.1 (28 Aug 2008
21:52:46 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: n38g2000prl.googlegroups.com;
posting-host=71.38.111.54;
posting-account=Xe6DEQoAAABnPZRU9fS4N7XlMMI1cZxA
==========================
71.38.111.54 = [ 71-38-111-54.phnx.qwest.net ]
(Asked whois.arin.net:43 about +71.38.111.54)
OrgName: Qwest Communications Corporation
OrgID: QCC-22
Address: 1801 California Street
City: Denver
StateProv: CO
PostalCode: 80202
Country: US
NetRange: 71.32.0.0 - 71.39.255.255
CIDR: 71.32.0.0/13
NetName: QWEST-INET-119
NetHandle: NET-71-32-0-0-1
Parent: NET-71-0-0-0-0
NetType: Direct Allocation
NameServer: AUTHNS1.MPLS.QWEST.NET
NameServer: AUTHNS2.DNVR.QWEST.NET
NameServer: AUTHNS3.STTL.QWEST.NET
Comment:
RegDate: 2004-12-17
Updated: 2006-02-09
RAbuseHandle: QIA2-ARIN
RAbuseName: Qwest Abuse
RAbusePhone: 1-877-886-6515
RAbuseEmail: abuse@qwest.net
RNOCHandle: QIN-ARIN
RNOCName: Qwest IP NOC
RNOCPhone: 1-877-886-6515
RNOCEmail: support@qwestip.net
RTechHandle: QIA-ARIN
RTechName: Qwest IP Admin
RTechPhone: 1-877-886-6515
RTechEmail: ipadmin@qwest.com
OrgAbuseHandle: QIA2-ARIN
OrgAbuseName: Qwest Abuse
OrgAbusePhone: 1-877-886-6515
OrgAbuseEmail: abuse@qwest.net
OrgNOCHandle: QIN-ARIN
OrgNOCName: Qwest IP NOC
OrgNOCPhone: 1-877-886-6515
OrgNOCEmail: support@qwestip.net
OrgTechHandle: QIA-ARIN
OrgTechName: Qwest IP Admin
OrgTechPhone: 1-877-886-6515
OrgTechEmail: ipadmin@qwest.com
ARIN WHOIS database last updated 2008-08-30 19: 10
On Tue, 12 Aug 2008 19:03:02 -0400, Sarah Czepiel cox.net>
wrote:
>On 12 Aug 2008 09:19:52 -0700, Jose Gaspar newsguy.com> wrote:
>
>:>In article 4ax.com>, Sarah Czepiel says...
>:>>
>:>>On 12 Aug 2008 06:03:46 -0700, Jose Gaspar newsguy.com> wrote:
>:>>
>:>>I'd forgotten that image. The Enterprise 1978 WESTPAC cruise. I thought
>:>>you meant the Churchill.
>:>
>:>And did you forget the images of shooting off the back porch too?
>
>:>And of Mikey?
>
>:>You see why no one believes you...
>
>Who is "no one"? You and all your remailers ? Funny how they show up
>only when you're around.
>
>:>>Cmelak lied when he said it was mistake for Karen to send those photo's to
>:>>John?
>:>
>:>Cite...
>
>It was already posted. Look it up. I'm perfectly happy to think he had
>no problem with her sending the pictures if that's how you want to resolve
>this.
>
>:>>Or the longwinded nym who last night wrote that Karen had sent John
>:>>some pictures ?
>:>
>:>And THAT's your verification?
>
>Either that or it's proof you nyms are liars. Make a choice.
>
>:>>:>Can you verify that Karen was ever in FL since the aborted date?
>:>>
>:>>I can't even resolve that you're in Florida NOW. You claim to live in an
>:>>area where you can watch Space Shuttle launches yet you had no idea that
>:>>there have been 30 night launches of the Shuttle. Night launches of the
>:>>shuttle is fairly common knowledge and I remember hearing about them way in
>:>>advance even while I was living up north. For someone supposedly living in
>:>>Fla. to have no knowledge that there have been THIRTY such launches is,
>:>>frankly, a little hard to swallow.
>:>>
>:>>But to answer your question, I don't recall ever seriously thinking that
>:>>she was in Fla. no, at least not living there long term.
>:>>
>:>>:>You see, considering all the fucking lies that Gilmer has said about me, I can
>:>>:>only assume that he is lying about Karen.
>:>>
>:>>He isn't lying about the pictures.
>:>> The pictures are on the website.
>:>
>:>So, if I put some pictures up of a woman's snatch and say you sent them to me,
>:>that's verification that you sent them?
>
>It would help your case if, like Pirate John, you had the mailer with the
>postmark and Delivery Confirmation Number.
>
>
>:>>He filed a police report on Karen's stalking activities.
>:>> The police report is scanned and on the website.
>:>> Read the report.
>:>
>:>You should know that when someone makes a complaint to a law enforcement agency,
>:>an officer HAS to log and file a report. The report is going to include exactly
>:>what the complainant says. A police report is a police report - nothing more -
>:>nothing less. In a situation like this, an officer had no way of knowing
>:>whether Gilmer was telling the truth or not.
>
>:>The officer simply writes the report and files it. If it is actionable, it will go to the State Attorney's
>:>office. Gilmer is using the court of public opinion to try to convict Karen -
>:>not a court of law. *IF* Gilmer had unimpeachable evidence, Karen would been
>:>indicted and found guilty of mailing interstate pornography.
>
>You do remember I'm married to a former Federal Marshal, right? And
>believe me, PO's make judgment calls every day on a person's credibility.
>In this case they found PJ and the evidence he presented were credible.
>
>The two reporting police officers felt the evidence warranted him filing
>charges. Their report states: " The victim was given a State Attorneys
>card and case information card. The victim was advised to file charges
>with the State Attorneys office against the suspect.
>
>Case not cleared - Patrol Follow up "
>
>Does that read to you like they looked at the images, the mailer with the
>return address, the Delivery Confirmation, etc... and thought some drinking
>buddy took the photos for PJ so he could libel some daffy old crackpot?
>
>Don't be stupid.
>
>:>The proof is in the pudding;
>
>Indeed. And you expect rational people to believe anonymous nym shifting
>posters and anonymous remailer users who provide no evidence whatsoever
>versus the Police, the photographic evidence, and someone who has a name,
>phone number, web site, who publishes his travels, etc....
>
>The people not to be believed is you. And if you are so foolish to believe
>otherwise it will be confirmation that your poor analytical skills, poor
>cognitive ability, and poor memory, are the least of your problems. --
As of the day this message is being posted there are,
lacking an unexpected alternate outcome, 141 days
remaining in the imperial presidency of George W. Bus
--
As of the day this message is being posted there are,
lacking an unexpected alternate outcome, 141 days
remaining in the imperial presidency of George W. Bush
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
