>
>On Jul 31, 3:25=A0am, Dave Witmarsh wrote:
>> On 29 Jul 2008 18:22:33 -0700, Jose Gaspar
newsguy.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>
>>>>>In article <045efb51-b799-4fd0-bd3a-858ebf9e8...@z26g2000pre.googlegroup=
>>>Lumpy says...
>>
>>>>On Jul 29, 5:40=3DA0pm, Jose Gaspar
newsguy.com> wrote:>>>>> In article
4ax.com>, Sarah Czepie=>l sa=3D
>>>>ys...
>>
>>>>>>On 29 Jul 2008 07:19:25 -0700, Jose Gaspar
newsguy.com>=> wro=3D
>>>>te:
>>
>>>>>>:>In article <0m8t849gu6j88khg6ue5lv28o5nllt6...@
4ax.com>, Ken Ehret=
>t sa=3D
>>>>ys...
>>>>>>:>>
>>>>>>:>>On Wed, 23 Jul 2008 03:10:30 -0500, ZapRatz
>>>>>>:>>
newsguy.com> wrote:
>>>>>>:>>
>>>>>>:>>>On 19 Jul 2008 15:36:01 -0700, Jose Gaspar >com>
>>>>>>:>>>wrote:
>>>>>>:>>>
>>>>>>:>>>>Sheesh! =3DA0Where'd everybody go? =3DA0
>>>>>>:>>>>
>>>>>>:>>>>Me and the Princess went to Old Town in Kissimmee, Florida yest=
>erda=3D
>>>>y. =3DA0They
>>>>>>had
>>>>>>:>>>>a great little fish and chip shop there. =3DA0Hell, the whole t=
>ime I =3D
>>>>was there
>>>>>>the
>>>>>>:>>>>customers were all speaking with British accents. =3DA0I finall=
>y aske=3D
>>>>d one of
>>>>>>the
>>>>>>:>>>>customers if any native born Americans eat here.
>>>>>>:>>>>The owner claimed that Haddock (what he used) was better for fi=
>sh a=3D
>>>>nd chips
>>>>>>than
>>>>>>:>>>>Cod. =3DA0I don't know about that but the Haddock he had was da=
>mned g=3D
>>>>ood. =3DA0The
>>>>>>chips
>>>>>>:>>>>were cut from fresh spuds which is always a pleasure to eat. =
>=3DA0The
>>>>>>Boddington's
>>>>>>:>>>>wasn't all that bad either...
>>>>>>:>>>>
>>>>>>:>>>>On the way back we spotted a pub at the intersection of HWY 27 =
>and =3D
>>>>I-4
>>>>>>which was
>>>>>>:>>>>called The Pub. =3DA0What a novel name for a pub... =3DA0It cla=
>imed it =3D
>>>>was an
>>>>>>:>>>>English-Scottish-Irish-Scottish pub. =3DA0I guess they didn't w=
>ant to=3D
>>>> offend
>>>>>>anybody
>>>>>>:>>>>- or they wanted to snatch all the folks they could driving by.=
>.. =3D
>>>>=3DA0I had
>>>>>>one
>>>>>>:>>>>more Boddington's. =3DA0The bartender was nice enough to give u=
>s a Br=3D
>>>>itish
>>>>>>newspaper
>>>>>>:>>>>to take home. =3DA0We continued on south and stopped into our f=
>avorit=3D
>>>>e Italian
>>>>>>:>>>>restaurant, La Belle Torre, in Lake Wales but it had closed. =
>=3DA0Wha=3D
>>>>t a
>>>>>>shame...
>>>>>>:>>>
>>>>>>:>>>
>>>>>>:>>>Didja spend a few minutes at Spook Hill in Lake Wales?
>>>>>>:>>>
>>>>>>:>>>I haven't been there in quite a few years.
>>>>>>:>>
>>>>>>:>>Do you think all the grocery stores still have your picture hangi=
>ng u=3D
>>>>p
>>>>>>:>>in the security office? =3DA0
>>>>>>:>
>>>>>>:>You know the old saying, "Write what you know about." =3DA0You gav=
>e it a=3D
>>>>way before
>>>>>>:>when you were posting as Sarah; you said you worked in "retail sec=
>urit=3D
>>>>y."
>>
>>>>>>Never. =3DA0"retail security" is not a term I use. =3DA0It is howeve=
>r how yo=3D
>>>>u get
>>>>>>crossed up when you twist the real facts to match your ongoing smear
>>>>>>campaign. =3DA0
>>
>>>>> No, its not me that gets crossed up, Sarah... =3DA0Everyone knows you=
> are a=3D
>>>> fucking
>>>>> liar. =3DA0You just keep posting lie after lie after lie...
>>
>>>>> Just to show what a goddamn liar you are:
>>>>> ______________________________________________________
>>
>>>>> Newsgroups: alt.gossip.celebrities, alt.true-crime, soc.women, alt.fe=
>mini=3D
>>>>sm,
>>>>> alt.support.marriage
>>>>> From: Sarah Czepiel
cox.net>
>>>>> Date: Wed, 04 Jan 2006 08:19:14 -0500
>>>>> Local: Wed, Jan 4 2006 6:19 am
>>>>> Subject: Re: American women: no question, you are headed for a mighty=> fal=3D
>>>>l
>>
>>>>> On Thu, 05 Jan 2006 06:00:23 GMT, "Avenger"
avengers.co.uk> wro=>te:
>>>>>>Erm, we've never done so. If a female for example is a shoplifter we=
> mak=3D
>>>>e a
>>>>>>million excuses for her misconduct.
>>
>>>>> Really? =3DA0I have worked in retail security and I'd be interested i=
>n
>>>>> sharing experiences on the subject with you. =3DA0Tell me about a spe=
>cific
>>>>> incident in which you were involved which illustrate your assertion
>>>>> regarding women. =3DA0
>>
>>>>LOL.
>>
>>>>Too high.
>>
>>>>Ken, you're such a tool.
>>
>>>Any bets as to how they try to weasel out of this one?
>>
>>>1. =A0Someone forged my account.
>>>2. =A0Oh... =A0*THAT* retail security...
>>>3. =A0Ken must have used my computer.
>>>4. =A0I was taking prescription pain meds at the time.
>>>5. =A0I don't *NORMALLY* use the term, retail security, HOWEVER...
>>
>> 6.Sorry Larry, this is Sarah. I signed on to Ken's account by
>> mistake.
>
>Lololol.
Ken Ehrett's reply when he got caught posting as Sarah Czepiel:
"Yep. Too lazy to switch from my wife's Agent account. So what?"
