http://casesearch.courts.state.md.us/inquiry/inquiry-index.jsp

I'd say he's on his way to 400 pounds by the time he's 60. Which will
then make him completely square, and he'll have to abandon his
Handicap Plates and travel entirely by railroad car.

On Sun, 13 Jan 2008 18:44:23 -0800 (PST), Lumpy
gmail.com> wrote:

Ho ho, Beavershot has finally found a friend on Usenet. It's a match
made in hell and you both deserve each other. You've already shown us
what a real sweat hog looks like in the buff. Sheesh.

On Jan 14, 6:52 am, Ken Ehrett olg.com> wrote:

You know something, "ken"? I'll tell you.

I am not Karen Anderson. There isn't a single person here who thinks I
am except you, and the only reason you say I am is to provide yourself
with a shield of ersatz protection. You think that by insisting that I
am KA, you're somehow protected from the reality of your situation.

Whoever Karen Anderson is, and I have no knowledge if a person named
KA is even aware of being used as crocodile bait on usenet, I do not
believe for a moment that she sent those pictures. It's true that...

On Jan 14, 12:37 pm, Lumpy gmail.com> wrote:

Ironically, the package was sent with tracking info. She wanted a
receipt.

And while nothing would totally surprise me, I have been in touch with
people who have met her, including police officers. The physical
descriptions match up with the photos that she sent me (and which I
forwarded to the Bremerton cops).

If you say that the addresses don't match up and that she's not where
you think that she should be, then I believe you. So there is some
other logical explanation.

Perhaps she has been using an assumed name at one time or another?

On Jan 14, 9:52 am, PyrateJohn gmail.com> wrote:

On Jan 14, 1:19 pm, Lumpy gmail.com> wrote:

I'll take a look at it in a few days. Since there was a return
address and that return address matched other return addresses that
she used (she mailed a couple of other, less provacative things to me
over the years) I never had a reason to question it.

Well ... I am not so sure that the address is a hoax.

And there is evidence in the photos (remember, there are about 45 of
them) that correspond to a tattoo that the mentioned in a email, and
so forth.

On Jan 14, 1:19 pm, Lumpy gmail.com> wrote:

Now that I think about it, isn't the postal stamp visible in the
photos? And isn't it clearly stamped Bremerton, WA?

On Jan 15, 2:09 am, Lumpy gmail.com> wrote:

I blew up the scan of the package. The delivery confirmation # is
0303 1910 0000 8275 9543. That's visible in the photo that you have
available.

There is a green tag in the upper left hand of the scan that isn't
visible but I believe that on the original package it has a stamped
indice from the Bremerton Post Office.

As I said, the original is in my files and they are at a separate
location. Perhaps I'll dig them out this weekend.

On Tue, 15 Jan 2008 03:52:48 -0800 (PST), PyrateJohn
gmail.com> wrote:

In article <14fb9ae3-7611-4c7a-8b3d-ed3b9db816d5@x69g2000hsx.googlegroups.com>,
PyrateJohn says...