|
|
 Up |
|
|
  |
| Re: Let us get this straight, ... |
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
Group: alt.nuke.the.usa · Group Profile
Author: ZapRatzZapRatz Date: Aug 31, 2008 18:05
On Thu, 28 Aug 2008 18:11:43 -0400, Sarah Czepiel cox.net>
wrote:
>From: Sarah Czepiel cox.net>
>Newsgroups: alt.nuke.the.usa,alt.obituaries,alt.usenet.kooks
>Subject: Re: Karen Anderson's snatch, was re Re: Karen Anderson, serial stalker, you creep me out, was Re:
>Message-ID: <4j8eb45pbhi4nn6pn0fjqdafbnki7b11bk@4ax.com>
>References: dizum.com> f63g2000hsf.googlegroups.com> <32bc4cd8-8150-4b03-818f-a1b2f32572c1@l64g2000hse.googlegroups.com> drn.newsguy.com> <7dd80543-d35a-44d1-a2a1-fec17863b103@l42g2000hsc.googlegroups.com> n38g2000prl.googlegroups.com>
>Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2008 18:11:43 -0400
>
>On Thu, 28 Aug 2008 14:52:46 -0700 (PDT), "DEAD GILMER aka Cmelak with an
>ASS fetish." yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>:>On Aug 28, 12:25 pm, AssPyrateJohn gmail.com> wrote:
>:>Look in the mirror, you'll see it again.
>
>Bend over Silly Billy. You're being boned. ;)
Could it be that I had nothing to do with the message for which you
posted your follow-up containing illogical misidentification?
The headers of the message to which you are referring to see that it
has no connection whatsoever with a domain in Wisconsin. Which, of
course, would be necessary if there were any chance that someone
residing in Wisconsin had posted the message.
Oh, and by the way, notice the number of newsgroups that the message
in question was simultaneously CROSS-POSTED into?
Buy a clue regarding that investigative tidbit.
sara cesspool, the malicious skank CUNT, gets it wrong AGAIN!
-------------------------
From: "DEAD GILMER." yahoo.com>
Newsgroups: alt.nuke.the.usa,alt.obituaries,alt.usenet.kooks
Subject: Re: Karen Anderson's snatch, was re Re: Karen Anderson,
serial stalker, you creep me out, was Re:
Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2008 14:52:46 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID:
n38g2000prl.googlegroups.com>
References: dizum.com>
f63g2000hsf.googlegroups.com>
<32bc4cd8-8150-4b03-818f-a1b2f32572c1@l64g2000hse.googlegroups.com>
drn.newsguy.com>
<7dd80543-d35a-44d1-a2a1-fec17863b103@l42g2000hsc.googlegroups.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 71.38.111.54
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1219960366 1186 127.0.0.1 (28 Aug 2008
21:52:46 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: n38g2000prl.googlegroups.com;
posting-host=71.38.111.54;
posting-account=Xe6DEQoAAABnPZRU9fS4N7XlMMI1cZxA
==========================
71.38.111.54 = [ 71-38-111-54.phnx.qwest.net ]
(Asked whois.arin.net:43 about +71.38.111.54)
OrgName: Qwest Communications Corporation
OrgID: QCC-22
Address: 1801 California Street
City: Denver
StateProv: CO
PostalCode: 80202
Country: US
NetRange: 71.32.0.0 - 71.39.255.255
CIDR: 71.32.0.0/13
NetName: QWEST-INET-119
NetHandle: NET-71-32-0-0-1
Parent: NET-71-0-0-0-0
NetType: Direct Allocation
NameServer: AUTHNS1.MPLS.QWEST.NET
NameServer: AUTHNS2.DNVR.QWEST.NET
NameServer: AUTHNS3.STTL.QWEST.NET
Comment:
RegDate: 2004-12-17
Updated: 2006-02-09
RAbuseHandle: QIA2-ARIN
RAbuseName: Qwest Abuse
RAbusePhone: 1-877-886-6515
RAbuseEmail: abuse@qwest.net
RNOCHandle: QIN-ARIN
RNOCName: Qwest IP NOC
RNOCPhone: 1-877-886-6515
RNOCEmail: support@qwestip.net
RTechHandle: QIA-ARIN
RTechName: Qwest IP Admin
RTechPhone: 1-877-886-6515
RTechEmail: ipadmin@qwest.com
OrgAbuseHandle: QIA2-ARIN
OrgAbuseName: Qwest Abuse
OrgAbusePhone: 1-877-886-6515
OrgAbuseEmail: abuse@qwest.net
OrgNOCHandle: QIN-ARIN
OrgNOCName: Qwest IP NOC
OrgNOCPhone: 1-877-886-6515
OrgNOCEmail: support@qwestip.net
OrgTechHandle: QIA-ARIN
OrgTechName: Qwest IP Admin
OrgTechPhone: 1-877-886-6515
OrgTechEmail: ipadmin@qwest.com
ARIN WHOIS database last updated 2008-08-30 19: 10
On Mon, 18 Aug 2008 00:28:38 -0400, Ken Ehrett olg.com> wrote:
>On 17 Aug 2008 20:45:45 -0700, Jose Gaspar newsguy.com> wrote:
>
>:>In article 4ax.com>, Sarah Czepiel says...
>:>>
>:>>On 17 Aug 2008 19:33:38 -0700, Harold Kramdon And The Poppy Snappers
>:>>newsguy.com> wrote:
>:>>
>:>>:>In article , Snarky says...
>:>>:>>
>:>>:>>On Sun, 17 Aug 2008 16:17:04 -0500, ZapRatz wrote these lies, denials,
>:>>:>>arrogant assertions, erroneous presuppositions, and/or obfuscations:
>:>>:>>> On Sun, 17 Aug 2008 13:40:24 -0400, Sarah Czepiel wrote:
>:>>:>>>>On Sun, 17 Aug 2008 05:23:55 -0500, ZapRatz wrote:
>:>>:>>>>:>On Fri, 15 Aug 2008 16:05:16 -0400, Ken Ehrett wrote:
>:>>:>>>>:>>From: Ken Ehrett olg.com>
>:>>:>>>>:>>Newsgroups: alt.nuke.the.usa
>:>>:>>>>:>>Subject: Re: Let us get this straight, Cmelak ... Date: Fri, 15 Aug
>:>>:>>>>:>>2008 16:05:16 -0400 Message-ID:
>:>>:>>>>:>>4ax.com> NNTP-Posting-Host:
>:>>:>>>>:>>74282483.news.usenetmonster.com X-Trace:
>:>>:>>>>:>>On Fri, 15 Aug 2008 07:38:04 -0700 (PDT), PyrateJohn wrote:
>:>>:>>>>:>>
>:>>:>>>>:>>>And if I do those things you will do just what for me, Cmelak?
>:>>:>>>>:>>>
>:>>:>>>>:>>>-- remove that nasty line from your signature?
>:>>:>>>>:>>>
>:>>:>>>>:>>>-- take down your web site?
>:>>:>>>>:>>>
>:>>:>>>>:>>>-- just generally ignore me when I post to newsgroups?
>:>>:>>>>:>>
>:>>:>>>>:>>John, please don't even consider negotiating with this fool. Consider
>:>>:>>>>:>>the following facts:
>:>>:>>>>:>>
>:>>:>>>>:>>1. You are holding all the cards so why deal? 2. Cmelak is a liar
>:>>:>>>>:>>and his word is worth nothing. There is no deal that either he or
>:>>:>>>>:>>that old whore in Bremerton will ever honor as Sarah and I have
>:>>:>>>>:>>experienced personally.
>:>>:>>>>:>>3. The fat retard has done absolutely nothing to hurt either you or
>:>>:>>>>:>>us despite a year long campaign to post every single piece of
>:>>:>>>>:>>information about me they could find on the Internet. 4. They are
>:>>:>>>>:>>both trash and should be treated as such anyway.
>:>>:>>>>:>
>:>>:>>>>:>
>:>>:>>>>:>Shut the fuck up, porky dork.
>:>>:>>>>:>
>:>>:>>>>:>John isn't holding all the cards; he isn't even holding the high hand
>:>>:>>>>:>in this game. He has had to "Go Fish" for four years while my online
>:>>:>>>>:>associates and I have been playing adult card games.
>:>>:>>>>:>
>:>>:>>>>:>You and Sarah know little about me, especially what aliases I have used
>:>>:>>>>:>over the past few years. All you know of me is what I have posted to
>:>>:>>>>:>usenet. I am not the person John lied about repeatedly or whatever you
>:>>:>>>>:>may have ineptly gleaned from usenet messages you presumed I
>:>>:>>>>:>transmitted, but didn't author.
>:>>:>>>>:>
>:>>:>>>>:>Just because you believe that I am Karen, Gaspar, Lumpy, and whomever
>:>>:>>>>:>else, doesn't make it fact. You've been incorrect about me to such a
>:>>:>>>>:>high degree that you have been stating gross inanities through your
>:>>:>>>>:>misidentifications.
>:>>:>>>>:>
>:>>:>>>>:>You have yet to provide succinct evidence identifying me as being the
>:>>:>>>>:>numerous people and aliases you have claimed I was. You are such a
>:>>:>>>>:>useless buffoon for repeatedly showing that facts and evidence mean
>:>>:>>>>:>nothing to you. But then, that irrationality also allows you to believe
>:>>:>>>>:>you are respectable and worth something. Your myopia causes you to
>:>>:>>>>:>gloss over the fact that you are a chump derelict. That's "something"
>:>>:>>>>:>all right. Low-class trash that is so fat, greasy and smelly that
>:>>:>>>>:>you're unsuitable for a vermicompost operation.
>:>>:>>>>:>
>:>>:>>>>:>If I have done nothing whatsoever to discredit John, his agreeing to a
>:>>:>>>>:>truce benefits him how, exactly, you retard? By that asinine comment
>:>>:>>>>:>you show once again how mentally defective you are.
>:>>:>>>>:>
>:>>:>>>>:>I have only repeated the presentation of personal data about you and
>:>>:>>>>:>Sarah that others presented before me. I know in your state of dementia
>:>>:>>>>:>that you don't believe my statement, but then again, you are retarded
>:>>:>>>>:>to the degree that evidence is not necessary for bolstering your
>:>>:>>>>:>certainty. You are a useless goon, probably a saloon-goon, at that; a
>:>>:>>>>:>stool-bum.
>:>>:>>>>:>
>:>>:>>>>:>If it weren't against pollution laws, you should find a burn barrel in
>:>>:>>>>:>a rural yard (better yet, a converted-for-the-task 200+ gallon former
>:>>:>>>>:>fuel oil tank), borrow someone's two-ton jib crane or tow truck to
>:>>:>>>>:>tightly pack your porcine monkey-ass inside the barrel, soak yourself
>:>>:>>>>:>with a flammable liquid (it'll take gallons for full coverage), strike
>:>>:>>>>:>a match (not a baboon's anus and your face, that, for once, is a
>:>>:>>>>:>different "match"), and do the world a favor by committing
>:>>:>>>>:>self-immolation. You'd stink up a three or four county area but, the
>:>>:>>>>:>acrid smoke would quell mosquito activity very well.
>:>>:>>>>:>
>:>>:>>>>:>You're such a bulbous pink and red tub of lard, and of such low moral,
>:>>:>>>>:>ethical and social standing that you can't even be considered "white
>:>>:>>>>:>trash."
>:>>:>>>>:>
>:>>:>>>>:>Suck the barrel of a loaded SIG Sauer and pull the trigger, you
>:>>:>>>>:>shitstain of the universe.
>:>>:>>>>
>:>>:>>>>Amazing how you manage to illustrate what a piece of trash you are
>:>>:>>>>yourself rather than what you'd hoped to do.
>:>>:>>>>
>:>>:>>>>Keep clapping with one hand, Cmelak.
>:>>:>>>
>:>>:>>>
>:>>:>>> If piece of shit Ken Ehrett olg.com> would refer to me respectfully
>:>>:>>> as you have over the past several days, I wouldn't have responded to him
>:>>:>>> in the manner that I did.
>:>>:>>>
>:>>:>>> Consider the adage, "You reap what you sow", and then objectively review
>:>>:>>> the text and thread progression quoted above.
>:>>:>>>
>:>>:>>> If you still have problems regarding my response to Ken Ehrett
>:>>:>>> olg.com> in this thread, then there truly is no hope for you.
>:>>:>>
>:>>:>>You, however, are stalking
>:>>:>
>:>>:>Would you like to write an essay defending that statement or would you like to
>:>>:>write the word 'stalking' on a piece of toilet paper and staple it on your
>:>>ass?
>:>>
>:>>Staple a map of Florida
>:>
>:>You said you grew up in RI... Which was it Sarah Cybil, RI or FL?
>
>Where Sara has lived is not the issue. The issue is you have never lived
>in Florida you lying sack of shit. You've been caught with your pants
>down Billy so either admit Karen wrote that or take the hit for it. Either
>way both of you are lying.
>
>And other thing Billy you just got through making a "sweetheart" deal with
>John to get the truth about you taken off his web site. How do you think
>he's going to feel about that deal now that we've caught you red handed
>coming in under the radar as Jose Gaspar and trashing him all damn day?
>I told John not to deal with you and this is the reason why. Neither one
>of you two scum have any honor. --
As of the day this message is being posted there are,
lacking an unexpected alternate outcome, 141 days
remaining in the imperial presidency of George W. Bus
--
As of the day this message is being posted there are,
lacking an unexpected alternate outcome, 141 days
remaining in the imperial presidency of George W. Bush
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
