| Re: Ken and Sarah, on the subject of .45's ... |
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
Group: alt.nuke.the.usa · Group Profile
Author: PyrateJohnPyrateJohn Date: Aug 17, 2008 17:29
On Aug 17, 7:22Â pm, Ken Ehrett olg.com> wrote:> On Sun, 17 Aug 2008 14:08:14 -0700 (PDT), PyrateJohn
>
> gmail.com> wrote:>>Was kicking this around today following our telecom of yesterday and
>>wanted to ask you opinion on something.
>
>>I've been looking at the Taurus 24/7 and you can find them at a
>>fraction of the cost of the H&K products. Â I had a Taurus once - years
>>ago - that was a built-under-license version of the Beretta that the
>>US Army adopted. Â The Taurus was actually excellent quality.
>
>>Whaddya think?  Suitable for going after those wild hogs that  we
>>talked about? Â ;)
>
>>They are cheap enough that if a person had to they could throw them
>>off a bridge somewhere. Â Just sayin' ...
>
> Are you referring to a .45 ACP or the 9mm copy of the Beretta? Â Taurus
> autos are not pretty but they do get the job done with a little fine
> tuning on the trigger. Â
This is the Taurus 24/7 OSS. They are available in different calibers
but I'm primarily interested in the .45
There is an article on this version at http://www.gunsandammomag.com/ga_handguns/trialsoss_042607/
and evidently that's a reprint of an article that is in the current
Guns and Ammo magazine.
| 
