"Sarah Czepiel"
cox.net> wrote in message
news:ehkta4tqpri5h6m7f2fl6h2oo5rgo86v4a@4ax.com> On Fri, 22 Aug 2008 05:18:17 GMT, "\"TeamKaren\" member"
> wrote:
>
>>> "Sarah Czepiel"
cox.net> wrote in message
>>> news:l1dsa49d6o78js0jodjlghfn6kj1qgrf9h@4ax.com>>>> On Fri, 22 Aug 2008 02:45:46 GMT, "\"TeamKaren\" member"
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>> Of course it will all be your fault cause you didn't PHONE
>>>>>> him so he could see what your number was and WHERE the call came
>>>>>> from, who the number is registered to.
>>>>
>>>> You seem to be saying ex cop Vietnam war hero Jose Gaspar is a
>>>> cowardly pussy.
>>>
>>> Not at all. Unlike you, he has numerous family members he cares
>>> about
>>> and doesn't run away from the *responsibility* of caring for his
>>> family.
>
> Nice self slap, Karen's cousin's 3rd husband. THIRD.
Her first husband died at age 39. She divorced her second husband. I'm
her last.
>
> "Lumpy" claims to have been married three times.
So has Gilmer been married 3x. He still IS married to wife #3 but is
living with his concubine now.
>
>>> And that also means keeping them safe from internet nutcases like
>>> John
>>> Gilmer who brags about killing people he doesn't like and offering
>>> big
>>> money to anyone who can reveal someone's name and location...just
>>> because he doesn't like him. Jose's family does NOT need to be put
>>> at
>>> risk because of his newsgroup activities with people like Gilmer
>>> and you
>>> and Ken. I think Jose's risking a lot by trying to meet Gilmer at
>>> all.
>>> There are people involved in this that Jose is trying to help and we
>>> don't want him putting himself or his family in danger. We feel it
>>> would be safer if he WAS a "cowardly pussy" (as you so tastefully
>>> put
>>> it).
>
> " Jose is trying to help...." LMAOAY
>
>
>>> You parade yourself and your "kid" Mikey around shamelessly, posting
>>> pictures
>
> Ken posted one picture of Mike years ago on antu. You had to ferret
> it out and photoshop it, stalker-harasser.
Ferret it out? It's in your album, the entire thing is accessible.
Didn't you know that? It was "photoshopped" (or so you say) long before
I ever saw it. Did you slap Ken's fingers for doing that?
> What has Mike done to you?
What has that poor older lady whose picture you keep posting for the
purpose of ridicule done to YOU? Even if her name happens to be "Karen
Anderson" -- there are thousands of them out there. Why are you being
abusive to this particular innocent lady?
>
>>> and demand that people phone you, giving out the number while
>>> realizing people can easily find you in MD or RI...as well as your
>>> ex
>>> and your son.
>
> Ken's phone number is listed. Bill's phone number is listed. You
> had it long before I ever gave it to you.
They are available in the White Pages on line....anybody can HAVE them.
Why are you listed in two states at the same time with two separate men
is the question? Because you insist on using the Czepiel name and
remain listed with Bill, that easily leads to Mikey. Google your name
and see what he and his friends can find. It's shameful and you don't
deserve to be a "mother" for you certainly are a horrid example of one.
>
>>> You are a selfish and sadist witch, Sarah.
>
> LOL! Well aren't you a silly oversensitive busy-body.
>
> Jose has the
>>> good sense to be a bit prudent.
>
> Prudent? You stupid ass. " Jose" sent the Family Court Judge in
> RI a letter/packet on my supposed fraudulent divorce.
He DID? I thought he threatened to do it but never knew he actually
DID. So, what happened to you and Ken? Not enough, it appears...
Jose wrote a
> disgusting picture and post about my son Mike on usenet.
I must remember to ask him how he "wrote a picture". Of course, you
would NEVER post anything DISGUSTING or false about someone else. You
are disgusting enough on your own. Do a google search on your name.
Pretend you are Mike or any of his friends.
>
>>> Just look what Gilmer has done with some the information Karen
>>> foolishly
>>> trusted him with. For starters, he has posted her name and home
>>> address
>>> about 2,000 times, all archived on Google.
>
> That's what the skanky bitch gets for sending her ugly beavershot
> pictures to people. Not one person has been anything but offended
> and horrified by her behavior, yet you DEFEND her.
You don't know that the pictures are of HER....that is your problem,
cunt. You start with a false premise and try to build your case from
there.
Karen is lucky PJ
> didn't contact the Postmaster General and have her arrested for
> sending pornography through the mail. That's a Federal offense, you
> dumbass.
He did. Was told he waited MUCH too long to complain. If he was so
victimized, he should have gotten going sooner than a YEAR later. He
waited a year before filing a police report, too.
>
>>> He invites people to harm or kill her. Just a couple days ago he
>>> was hoping somebody would put a bullethole between her eyes
>>> (Cmelak, too).
>
> You can't separate usenet from reality. Must be an Anderson family
> trait.
Her address isn't "usenet" -- it is real. I am married to the maternal
side of Karen's family.
>
>
> And he claims to be so into
>>> charity and helping others. Oh really? If he will beat the hell
>>> out of
>>> his wife, what will he do about people he has no relationship with
>>> at
>>> all?
>
>>> Don't kid yourself, Sarah. There is plenty of criminal history in
>>> Wake
>>> County, NC records about your good "friend".
>
> Says you. Post the records or email them to me. My email address
> is valid.
LOOK THEM UP YOURSELF. Or pay for them. That way you will know they
are real. Some have already been posted with case #s....."Assault On a
Woman" and "Communicating Threats". Find them on Google. I'm not your
fawking secretary...
>
>>> Do you admire and like a
>>> "cowardly pussy" who has a dozen calls to his home for "domestic
>>> violence", Sarah? I don't. Most decent people don't.
>>>
>>> Should Jose be meeting this person at all? I don't think so.
>
> Don't worry, Karen's cousin's THIRD husband, "Jose" is going to
> chicken out like he's done twice already. "Jose" isn't going to
> meet anyone.
Explain just WHO is "chickening out" and how you are determining that.
>
>>> He will be lucky if Gilmer doesn't kill him. He can't be too
>>> cautious now and
>>> during and AFTER the meeting.
>
> "Jose" is going to chicken out like he's done twice already, "Jose"
> isn't going to meet anyone.
Explain just WHO is "chickening out" and how you are determining that.
>
>>> Did you know that Gilmer tried to ambush Karen at her motel the
>>> night
>>> before they were supposed to meet and he had a gun with him?
>
> Is it a secret that PJ has a CCW? More evidence that you're a liar
> since "criminals" don't hold CCW permits.
They are criminals if they kill someone.
>>> This bastard is a nutcase. And because he's alive, he is a THREAT.
>
> If you think he's a threat it is because YOU NUTCASES are actively
> harassing people who are capable of shooting your fat ass and dumping
> it off a bridge.
Ooooh....is that *real life* or just *usenet*?
And if you think you're not traceable you're a
> fool. If someone wants to find you, they will.
Easy enough when a good woman's home address is posted on the interent
2000 times and archived in Google forever.
Why don't you set about tracing your nemesis Jose Gaspar, then?
Straighten out your extreme confusion about who's who.
>
>>> Jose, his children and their families, their mother and the
>>> Princess and
>>> those she cares about don't need John Gilmer's cyber-stalking,
>>> digging
>>> around in their lives and then posting shit he's made up about them
>>> on
>>> the internet...
>
> You mean cyber-stalking, digging around in their lives, and posting
> crap you've made up like : Ken's court records?
They are TRUE.
Ken's property
> records?
True.
> Claiming our home is in foreclosure?
It soon will be if he doesn't clear up some of those mortgages. Why
aren't you helping him if you're living there?
> Claiming Ken is lame?
He is. Larry said he was using a cane. Let's see a picture that shows
his legs. So far they are hidden behind a car door or he's sitting in
the car. He's obviously VERY overweight.
> Claiming I'm lame?
Take that up with Jose.
Claiming to have Ken video taped?
Take that up with Lumpy (if he's still alive)
Claim to have
> called and spoken to both Bill and one of my sons?
See above. Lumpy did that before we ever heard of him and that was only
because you and Ken were using him to write ugly lies about Karen. Why
did you do that? She had nothing to do with ANTU or any of these groups
you are cross-posting to.
> What did Ken, and Bill, and Mike do to warrant your cyber-stalking?
1) I haven't done any of it. As usual, you are accusing the WRONG
person. What did Karen do to YOU or KEN (who she never heard of till
recently) to warrant YOUR cyber-stalking? It's all about your envy of
her and John telling you as xXumShinriKyoXx to BACK OFF from attacking
her. That really burned your ass and you can't get over it yet, can
you? You are such an envious old slag who can't take any backlash from
what you dish out. You clearly HATE women, especially when they are
better than you.
>
>>> or worse, following them around and actually hurting or
>>> killing them.
>
> Or videotaping someone a la Lumpy ?
Lame, Sarah. Lame. You and Ken were going around with Lumpy long
before he came to anybody else's attention. He was "Potato...something"
wasn't he? I have no idea what transpired except for noticing Karen's
name cross-posted and tracing back to see what was going on. You had
absolutely NO cause or justification to drag Karen into whatever Lumpy
was writing or doing. Since he was in a hospice at the time, I can't
imagine he was DOING very much. You are a crybaby just like Gilmer.
You will do absolutely ANYTHING to someone else, but whine like a stuck
hog if somebody gives you a dose of your own medicine.
>
> Every thing you claim others have done to you, is actually what you
> have done to them.
Every thing you claim others have done to you, is actually what you have
done to them.
>
>>> They aren't far from him compared to Washington
>>> State....tho pepper spray and a couple of other things are waiting
>>> for
>>> Gilmer if he ever scrapes up enough money to buy fuel to motorcycle
>>> up
>>> there.
>
> People like you always get eaten by the tiger because you keep poking
> him.
People like Gilmer always get eaten by the tigress because he keeps
poking at her.
> You want this to stop but you are driven by an insane desire for
> revenge.
What is HE driven by? That is the question...
>
> You ain't gonna get it, pal.
I'm not your "pal". That would be Gilmer.
>
> You're terrified of Gilmer,
Not at all...he couldn't find us with FOUR GPS units. Besides he can't
afford fuel to ride a motorcycle to Washington. Do you know he intended
to do that to visit Karen...mentioned it
several times. She did NOT want him to. Then he offered to meet her in
southern California (Slab City) which he called "half way". She refused
that, too.
yet you and all your batshit nyms hang
> your asses out by following and harassing the people you fear and
> loathe.
And you have never done that with Karen on Usenet? Have you no
self-awareness or do you think everyone is too stupid to see through you
and your "men"?
>
> I told you weeks ago, GO AWAY. LEAVE. I could care less about you
> THIRD husband, your loser of a wife, and your skanky beavershot
> picture sending relative.
Now right there shows your envy and hatred for other women. My wife is
no LOSER. She's had a tough time raising two little boys after her
husband died. She worked hard and managed to buy a few old houses one
by one that needed fixing and then she rented them out. Eventually, she
sold them. Made some very nice profit from the endeavor. I'm a retired
fireman and we continue to go forward financially because we always sell
a home in far better condition than we bought it. My wife is a master
gardener and we never lack for prospective buyers because our homes are
extremely appealing, outside and inside.
You could "care less" about me? You ASKED who I was and I told you.
The correct term is "couldn't care less", btw.
>
> As far removed from the truth that you, and Jose/Cmelak are, Ken and
> I are everything we've said we are.
From where I'm sitting THAT isn't much...you are an example of people
who LIVE on the internet because their real lives suck.
>
> Keep that in mind.
>
> YHAND.
I do intend to have another nice day, Sarah. And I also intend to stop
conversing with YOU. You are a toxic presence on Usenet. I doubt
you're any better in real life. Otherwise, Bill wouldn't have let you
go to take up with a loser like Ken Ehrett. He didn't seem to CARE...
