Fat She- Males", where's The Flitwick Failure aka "maximilian smith"
tonight? He must be hiding after
releasing schizophrenic old Lumpy from her cage to fend off the saber
blows for him. What's one more hack on her ugly face? Doesn't look
like Fatso's had much luck in getting her nasty beavershot piccy's off
the net has he? Bwahahaha...!

Oh BTW, Ken and I had a nice 30 minute phone conversation with Pirate
John Friday night. We had to cut it short as he was meeting up with
his lovely Lady and Ken and I were meeting friends for dinner. It was
nice to hear the voice of someone I've known on usenet for almost 10
years. PJ sounded like one happy fellow as he should with his
continued professional success and with the love of a wonderful woman
by his side. Life is good. :)

On Feb 24, 9:43 pm, Sarah Czepiel cox.net> wrote:

No, you didn't. There is no Ken and Sarah. It's Ken. It's time you
started helping yourself get over this and move on.

On Mon, 25 Feb 2008 17:49:26 +1100, Dave Witmarsh
wrote:

:>On Mon, 25 Feb 2008 00:43:13 -0500, Sarah Czepiel cox.net>
:>wrote:
:>
:>> Ken and I were meeting friends for dinner
:>
:>BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!
:>Sarah Cesspool gets funnier by the minute. "Ken and I...friends..."
:>Priceless!

Tsk, tsk.....all those lies that you never read my posts. Hope
you're enjoying your day old Big Mac throwaways, Queefer. ;)

On Mon, 25 Feb 2008 21:09:53 +1100, Dave Witmarsh
wrote:

:>On Mon, 25 Feb 2008 02:39:31 -0500, Sarah Czepiel cox.net>
:>wrote:
:>
:>>On Mon, 25 Feb 2008 17:49:26 +1100, Dave Witmarsh
:>>wrote:
:>>
:>>:>On Mon, 25 Feb 2008 00:43...

On Tue, 26 Feb 2008 00:09:29 +1100, Dave Witmarsh
wrote:

:>On Mon, 25 Feb 2008 06:55:55 -0500, Sarah Czepiel cox.net>
:>wrote:
:>
:>>On Mon, 25 Feb 2008 21:09:53 +1100, Dave Witmarsh
:>>wrote:
:>>
:>>:>On Mon, 25 Feb 2008 02:39...

On Feb 25, 1:07 am, President Lumpy gmail.com> wrote:

Sorry to burst your bubble, but there is definitely a Ken and a Sarah.

Now, as to whether or not there is more than one troll, and that troll
is obviously named Karen K. Anderson, that's a different matter.

On Feb 25, 6:48 am, PyrateJohn gmail.com> wrote:

It doesn't matter if there are fifty Karen Anderson trolls. The fact
remains there is no Ken and Sarah, and though you may have spoken to
that lard-bucket debtor himself, I don't for a moment believe you
about the SockySarahSarinWatchQueen of usenet. They're all Ken.

You were fairly easy to figure out. You encouraged an internet
relationship with a woman and kept up the ruse till the very day that
you agreed to meet her. Since you're a dishonest individual, as
evidenced by the Self you show, you were unable to simply apologize
and come clean and clear the matter up as much as possible, given hurt
feelings, etc.

But no. You defended yourself by inventing a series of ridiculous
photos and used a package that she had mailed you legitimately to
connect the scenario, and launched a smear against the woman.

On Mon, 25 Feb 2008 06:48:27 -0800 (PST), PyrateJohn
gmail.com> wrote:

:>On Feb 25, 1:07 am, President Lumpy gmail.com> wrote:
:>> On Feb 24, 9:43 pm, Sarah Czepiel cox.net> wrote:
:>>
:>> > Oh BTW, Ken and I had a nice 30 minute phone conversation with Pirate
:>> > John Friday night.  
:>>
:>> No, you didn't. There is no Ken and Sarah.  It's Ken. It's time you
:>> started helping yourself get over this and move on.
:>
:>
:>
:>Sorry to burst your bubble, but there is definitely a Ken and a Sarah.
:>
:>Now, as to whether or not there is more than one troll, and that troll
:>is obviously named Karen K. Anderson, that's a different matter.

On Feb 24, 11:39 pm, Sarah Czepiel cox.net> wrote:

There is not a female in the entire world who would make that comment,
Ken. You are so dissociated that you can't write in character, even
marginally.

PyrateJohn wrote:

Thank-you for that information, Sarah.

Greg.P.