>
>On Aug 26, 10:38=A0am, PyrateJohn gmail.com> wrote:
>

>> Your "buddies" turned out to be total frauds and pretty well affirmed
>> that Karen Anderson is the only one pulling the strings and that that
>> she is, indeed, some sort of serial stalking nutcase.
>>
>> Aren't you proud of yourself, "Lumpy"?

>
>I'm proud of myself when I make a perfect cast, or a three-point dive,
>or making it through a boring party, or any number of things, but I'm
>unclear what type of proud YOU are referring to. In the old says,
>proud sometimes meant an infected site.
>
>Anyway, here's how I see it: there really is a Karen Anderson. There
>really is a ZapRat. There really is yours truly and a Gilmer and Ken
>Ehrett posting as Sarah. Aside from the old-time regulars, i.e., Greg
>and Nick and Woo... et al.... they're mostly gone now..... we all know
>what's going on and who's who. The only thing I find awry is Gilmer's
>obsession with Karen. I can understand her obsession with him, but
>it's odd bodkins to see a man so disturbed by a senior citizen lady.
>Unless he's scared. Maybe he is?