In article , The God of Odd Statements, Henry Schmidt says...
>
>On Mon, 08 Sep 2008 07:06:27 -0700, Jose Gaspar did most oddly state:
>> Teh Czar ov Awl Teh Flonkers says...
>>>I'll never know another Jose Gaspar like Jose Gaspar on Mon, 08 Sep 2008
>>>06:28:15 -0700 in alt.nuke.the.usa, and alt.usenet.kooks, they're so
>>>drad:
>>>> Karen says...
>>>>>"Emo Haircut" wrote
>>>>>> Karen wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> step back and ask
>>>>>>> yourself "what if?".
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> 9) What if Karen really posted as Nomen Nescio during the actual
>>>>>>> time Gilmerous and Jose WERE in the same place in Orlando at the
>>>>>>> same time and she was at home in WA?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Uh, Karen dear, admitting you use anonymous remailers sorta defeats
>>>>>> the whole purpose of using them in the first place.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> HTH
>>>>>
>>>>>Um...Haircut, that was then and this is now.
>>>>
>>>> I find it quite amazing that the k00ks bitch about your long winded
>>>> posts but they read every bit of them... heh...
>>>>
>>>> I do believe you have a following...
>>>
>>>You're quite mad. I wouldn't dream of actually "reading" Andersonian
>>>screed. Waaaayyyy too over-written.
>>
>> Haven't progressed beyond comic books, have you, my little child...
>
>I'm currently reading _Stand On Zanzibar_, by John Brunner, for the third
>or fourth (maybe fifth) time. Damn good book, and has a rather startling
>number of accurate predictions about Earth in May/June 2010.
Which ones do you feel are accurate and why do you feel they are startling?
Please also explain why Brunner's predictions were any more or less accurate
than any sociologist living at that time?