>On Sat, 06 Sep 2008 22:17:29 GMT, "Karen" nospam.com> wrote:
>
>:>"Sarah Czepiel or Ken Ehrett" cox.net> wrote in message
>:>
>:>>>> Ken Ehrett goes around accusing people of stalking him
>:>>
>:>> You HAVE stalked people. Lots of people.
>:>
>:>When did anybody threaten to call a specific police detective at your
>:>local station but only stopped when Gilmer wrote back channel and
>:>advised to back off?! That would be YOU who did that to ME because you
>:>didn't like what Jose or Lumpy posted.
>
>BWAHAHAHAHAHA !!! Gawd but you're a paranoid psychotic old bitch.
>
>:>> You put Ken's property info on usenet.
>:>
>:>Lumpy did not. Jose Gaspar did. Lumpy lives in WA State; Jose lives in
>:>Florida. How thick is your head anyway?
>:>
>:>That was PUBLIC INFORMATION easily obtained from a State of Maryland
>:>website. Far better to post FACTS about you than you making up SHIT
>:>about other people.
>
>Your "FACTS" are nothing more than a string of your false assumptions such
>as Ken and I aren't married; that he is on disability; that he is a
>diabetic; that I have only one son; that I am not divorced from Bill; that
>Ken or I depending on your mood swing at the time is a sockpuppet. Those
>kinds of false assumptions are what you try to claim as your k00k facts.
>
>:>We deal with FACTS and TRUTH;
>
>We? So you've in on this all along, your recent denials are just more
>lies.
>
>:>you use LIES and baseless accusations with
>:>NO PROOF. See why we always win??
>
>You never win Karen. That's why you're so angry. :)
>
>:>> You put Ken's court record on usenet.
>:>
>:>Again. PUBLIC INFORMATION readily available. No "stalking" involved.
>:>Maybe if you lived your life so you had nothing to be ashamed of if it
>:>was revealed, you wouldn't be so bitter and deceptive.
>
>Ashamed of? We're not ashamed of slamming your ugly ass Karen. :)
>
>:>> You CLAIM you have Ken's DD214.
>:

>>

>:>I don't know if Lumpy has it or not. Keep your nose clean in life and
>:>things you don't want revealed won't be on the internet for anybody with
>:>an IQ over wallpaper to find.
>
>:>>:>> And if you have his DD214, that's actionable.
>:>
>:>Such as.....?
>
>It would have been obtained through fraudulent means which is a Federal
>Crime. And actionable.
>
>:>> You've stalked my ex husband.
>:>> You've said vile things about one of my sons.
>:>> You've stalked my ex husband's 91 year old tenant in his rental
>:>> property.
>:>
>:>Waaaaaaahhhhhh.....!!!! You can give it out, but you can't take it, whining crybaby.
>
>Oh *I* can take all you can dish out Karen and I throw it right back at
>you.
>
>:> I thought you said this was a FLAME newsgroup.
>
>It is.
>
>Bill is not on antu.
>My son is not on antu.
>Bill's 91 year old tenant isn't on antu.
>
>ALL have been a target of your nastiness, Karen.
>
>
>:>You flame and others take it?
>
>That's why you're here Karen, to have shit flung in your face.
>
>
>:>>>> when he continually publishes his address and phone number amd
>:>>>> screams for people to call him.
>:>>
>:>> Is that a crime? Why does that offend you so?
>:>
>:>Because you are a HYPOCRITE who pitches a fit about being
>:>STALKED....kinda like Gilmer. You invite people to do something and
>:>when they do, you scream "STALKER".
>
>I could care less what you say and do about me on a FLAME group Karen.
>
>I call you a psychotic STALKER when you involve people not on usenet - my
>ex, one of my sons, and a 91 year old woman.
>
>Same for your involvement of John's lady. It's your mental illness, you
>can't help flailing out at anyone and everyone.
>
>:>That's one reason why most people don't fall for your come-ons to phone you.
>:>You'll turn that around to evidence that you were being STALKED. It's all a set-up
>:>on your part. You don't want to talk on the phone to ANY of us. You just want us to
>:>hear your answering machine message and hopefully, we might say
>:>something you will have recorded. At least you'll know where the call
>:>originated from and the phone number.
>
>[ JHC, why couldn't you have at least sent an intelligent crackpot to
>stalk me....? LOL. ]
>
>
>:>> Why did you search databases and put his personal info on usenet?
>:>
>:>Who do YOU?!
>
>Sorry to disappoint you Karen but I don't search databases for you or
>anyone else. I don't do Google searches either. You just don't matter to
>me.
>
>:>Even worse, you just put shit out there (or support Gilmer
>:>when he does) and treat it like gospel truth...that is FAR WORSE than
>:>the FACTS and TRUTH. You're a sick and sadistic bitch.
>
>Bwahahaha!! Karen by your latest appearance on usenet you've done far
>far more damage to yourself than John Gilmer ever did to you. Your k00k
>screeds have now attracted AUK and several other groups to have you on
>their RADAR target list. Good job, old girl.
>
>
>:>>>> That is not kook stuff?
>:>>
>:>> What you've done is clearly beyond k00k stuff. You're clearly
>:>> mentally ill and you can't hide it no matter which nym you post under.
>:>
>:>And you are the model for mental health? I don't often use this word,
>:>but it must *SUCK* to be you!!
>
>Well, I'm here in RI on vacation, driving a Corvette, taking trips to
>Newport, and this is you: http://www.buccaneerpublishing.com/Anderson1.htm
>
>Don't think so, old girl. :)
>
>:>Karen