In article
bgtnsc05-news.ops.worldnet.att.net>, Karen
says...>
>"Jose Gaspar"
newsguy.com> wrote in message
>news:g9d42u023pt@drn.newsguy.com>>>
>>> On Aug 30, 7:57=A0pm, Sarah Czepiel
cox.net> wrote:
>>>
>>>>>>> Same as the 5.56 John. =A0.223 is caliber and 5.56mm is
>>>> european/NATO standard. =A0 Yep it's confusing. =A0:)
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> As I recall they are the same diameter, but one was designed for more
>>> spirals in the barrel than the other.
>>>
>>> The standards changed about the time that I was involved with the
>>> Bomb Company because FN wanted a little different round for their
>>> small machine gun that effectively replaced the M-60 at squad level,
>>> and the upshot was that the US adopted the FN round across the board.
>>>
>>> In VERY general terms the two rounds are interchangeable although I
>>> suspect that you'd get some jamming if you indescrimately mixed and
>>> matched them.
>>>
>>> Did I pass the exam, Sarah? ;)
>>
>> Yeah, Sarah... did the retarded motherfucker pass the exam?
>>
>> Too bad you're killfiled because I'd love to puke on your apologist
>> bullshit...
>
>I am not going to "announce" that I'm kill-filing both Ken and Sarah,
>but my replies are going to noticeably taper off. They and their games
>and their opinions and spins and judgment of me is completely
>meaningless to me. I'm not going to be talking with Sarah only to find
>Ken replying. I'm not going to discuss anything further with either of
>them.
They are trying to dilute your facts about John Gilmer by posting inane
nonsense. No one has to be a psychiatric professional to understand Ken/Sarah.
Hell, you can be fucking brain dead and know you are dealing with textbook
sadomasochists. They don't think right. There's nothing about them that is
normal and they can't follow logic.
>My focus is John Gilmer and the ONLY reason I decided to post again. He
>is not going to continue what he did to me for more than FOUR years.
You've admitted that what you did was wrong. That takes a lot of guts. John
Gilmer will never admit to his part, so tear him apart piece by piece. Put it
all out there for the world to see. He deserves that and more. Concentrate on
just him and leave Ken/Sarah/Snarky out of it. They are just running
interference for John Gilmer, and they are the only pukes he has to back him.
Four years ago John had plenty of friends - now he has none. Ken/Sarah are
using him to get at you because you've trashed the shit out them before. Once
this is done, Ken/Sarah will spit John Gilmer out of their mouths faster than
one would spit out a dead toad.
>This could have ended quickly many years ago via email but he's a
>fucking DRAMA QUEEN and had to drag private affairs onto the
>INTERNET.
He had friends back then to back him up; he didn't have the balls to confront
you personally then, and he doesn't now either. He thought that he would
embarrass you so you would shut up. Ha! Little did he know what he ran into.
You have successfully caused him to smear his own name all over the internet.
John Gilmer is the one who has to find employment and find another woman. HE is
the one who has hurt himself but the fucking fool can't comprehend that.
Basically, he tried to stop you through extortion - by threatening to post the
pictures that you sent him. If I were you, Karen, I would go back though the
archives, before Gilmer has a chance to nuke the posts, and hardcopy the threats
he made about posting those pictures. That could put that fucker behind bars
for awhile. Obviously his stalking charges went flatter than a fritter so he
had nothing left but to take it to usenet. That was a serious mistake for him
and he has committed a criminal offense by threatening to post those pictures.
What that means is that you don't have to hire a lawyer and it won't cost you a
dime. Just gather the facts and present them to your local prosecuting
attorney's office. You may use this e-mail address to get started:
mwilloug@co.kitsap.wa.us; wkelly@co.kitsap.wa.us; cmaves@co.kitsap.wa.us
What John Gilmer did was a serious crime and don't let the clowns tell you
differently. All you have to do is present the posts where John threatened to
post those pictures.
"Virtually all extortion statutes require that a threat must be made to the
person or property of the victim. It is not necessary for a threat to involve
physical injury. It may be sufficient to threaten to accuse another person of a
crime or to expose a secret that would result in public embarrassment or
ridicule. The threat does not have to relate to an unlawful act."
The laws vary from state to state so you will have to contact your prosecuting
attorney's office to know for sure how they can help you. Let the law take care
of that bastard!
DO IT!
