... I work regularly with a legacy F77 program that has author-written DMA. (I'm not the author.) The program structure permits a stack sort of allocation. At the beginning you allocate one humongous array X, and put the array and an integer pointer to the "next available element" in common. When you need some more memory, you start loading stuff in the next available element, and ...

Richard Maine wrote: (someone wrote) At the beginning you allocate one humongous array X, and put the array and an integer pointer to the "next available element" in common. Well, yes... I've seen and used schemes like that plenty of times in the past. And I suppose it is dynamic in that you are dynamically allocating space within the array to your different purposes. But ...

... of any kind. Dynamic allocation wasn't standard in Fortran until f90. Prior to that, some codes used nonstandard nonportable hacks of various kinds. ... At the beginning you allocate one humongous array X, and put the array and an integer pointer to the "next available element" in common. ... The reason I'm writing this: this simple scheme IS portable. I've used it on ...

... I work regularly with a legacy F77 program that has author-written DMA. (I'm not the author.) The program structure permits a stack sort of allocation. At the beginning you allocate one humongous array X, and put the array and an integer pointer to the "next available element" in common. When you need some more memory, you start loading stuff in the next available element, and ...

... kinds. I work regularly with a legacy F77 program that has author-written DMA. (I'm not the author.) The program structure permits a stack sort of allocation. At the beginning you allocate one humongous array X, and put the array and an integer pointer to the "next available element" in common. When you need some more memory, you start loading stuff in the next available element, and ...

...:) :> :>Hey, pinhead, have you ever heard of "email?" Pretty funny coming from one of the worst spammers on usenet. I see your Jose Gaspar nym has PLONKed me after your humongous faux pas of posting a Jose Gaspar " Bwahahaha !!!! " post as ZapRatZ. Oh dear.... Tell me Cmelak, do your neighbors still describe you as looking and behaving like Haystack Calhoun? -- As ...

... sent him ONE which he broke up into about 5 when replying? It's like creeping crud the way the volume of his emails increase every day. Then there were all the copious signature lines. His folder is HUMONGOUS and takes up a major part of my old computer's hard drive. But it's all "evidence" and I will always save it. And because of LUMPY, GASPAR, and YOU YOURSELF here we are ...

... to find someone to fight their losing battles for them. How's that working out for you, by the way? BWAhahahahahahahahahahahhahaha!!!!!!!!!!! I see your Jose Gaspar nym has PLONKed me after your humongous faux pas of posting a Jose Gaspar " Bwahahaha !!!! " post as ZapRatZ. Oh dear.... I'm not Gaspar and have never posted as, or using, that identity. Therefore, the remainder ...

...:>>Stay cool. :) :> :>Hey, pinhead, have you ever heard of "email?" Pretty funny coming from one of the worst spammers on usenet. I see your Jose Gaspar nym has PLONKed me after your humongous faux pas of posting a Jose Gaspar " Bwahahaha !!!! " post as ZapRatZ. Oh dear.... Tell me Cmelak, do your neighbors still describe you as looking and behaving like Haystack Calhoun?

... viscous circle to me. Correct. This is the reason why it is idiotic to oppose the change and defend a status-quo. ANY status-quo. This is the reason why conservatism it is such a humongous mistake. I'm not defending the status-quo. But I'm not going to pretend that the 'other party' isn't more of the same. Chances are that every implemented system will have some flaws, due ...